Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Časopis pro pěstování matematiky

A note on weak hidden variables

Jiří Binder

Published Jan 1, 1989• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

We consider a cr-additive version of "centrally additive" hidden variables as intro duced in [9].As the main result we construct a logic without sufficiently many centrally additive dispersion free states.Consequently, this logic does not admit weak hidden variables.
DOI
10.21136/cpm.1989.118367

Related papers

Weak dispersion-free states and the hidden variables hypothesis

Pavel Pták

We investigate dispersion-free states which are additive only on the pairs containing a central element (central-absolutely compatible). We show that any logic possesses plenty of such states, in fact, as many as a certain Boolean algebra. The latter result matches the hidden variables conjecture.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Apr 1, 1983•14 citations

Generalized Hidden Variables Theorem

Platon C. Deliyannis

Two versions of the hidden variables theorem are presented with minimum hypotheses. The second is intended to be an answer to a question raised by Jauch and Mackey regarding the existence of approximately dispersion-free states.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jun 1, 1971•6 citations

Dispersion-Free States and the Exclusion of Hidden Variables

Stanley Gudder

Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society•Apr 1, 1968•16 citations

Establishing J. von Neumann’s result of the incompatibility between hidden variables and quantum mechanics

C. S. Unnikrishnan

The impossibility of making quantum mechanics deterministic by adding ‘hidden variables’ was discussed by J. von Neumann in 1932. His proof of the impossibility of dispersion-free ensembles was criticized as being logically circular, by Grete Hermann soon after, and as fundamentally flawed, by John Bell in 1964. Bell’s severe criticism and an explicit counter-example are generally considered as the definitive demonstration that J. von Neumann’s proof is inadequate. I show, without using the formalism of quantum mechanics, that J. von Neumann’s central assumption of the linear additivity of the expectation values, even for incompatible (noncommuting) observables, is a necessary consequence that follows directly from the fundamental conservation laws of physical quantities, applicable universally. With this result, J. von Neumann’s result is fully resurrected. I identify the physical reason why dispersion-free ensembles cannot exist. After discussing the conflict of Bell’s counter-example with the factual mechanics, I highlight the result that the local hidden variable theories, for which the Bell’s inequalities were derived, are grossly incompatible with the fundamental conservation laws. In a scrutiny of the vital difference between the ‘causal incompleteness’ of quantum mechanics, discussed by J. von Neumann, and the ‘representational incompleteness’ discussed by Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen, I prove the striking demarcating result that a multi-particle system that is considered causally completed can remain EPR-incomplete. I identify the wave nature of the action as the reason behind the irreducible quantum dispersion and the impossibility of dispersion-free ensembles.

Academia quantum.•Apr 23, 2025•2 citations

On the Unconditional Validity of J. von Neumann's Proof of the Impossibility of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics

C. S. Unnikrishnan

The impossibility of theories with hidden variables as an alternative and replacement for quantum mechanics was discussed by J. von Neumann in 1932. His proof was criticized as being logically circular, by Grete Hermann soon after, and as fundamentally flawed, by John Bell in 1964. Bell's severe criticism of Neumann's proof and the explicit (counter) example of a hidden variable model for the measurement of a quantum spin are considered by most researchers, though not all, as the definitive demonstration that Neumann's proof is inadequate. Despite being an argument of mathematical physics, an ambiguity of decision remains to this day. I show that Neumann's assumption of the linear additivity of the expectation values, even for incompatible (noncommuting) observables, is a necessary constraint related to the nature of observable physical variables and to the conservation laws. Therefore, any theory should necessarily obey it to qualify as a physically valid theory. Then, obviously, the hidden variable theories with dispersion-free ensembles that violate this assumption are ruled out. I show that it is Bell's counter-example that is fundamentally flawed, being inconsistent with the factual mechanics. Further, it is shown that the local hidden variable theories, for which the Bell's inequalities were derived, are grossly incompatible with the fundamental conservation laws. I identify the intrinsic uncertainty in the action as the reason for the irreducible dispersion, which implies that there are no dispersion-free ensembles at any scale of mechanics. With the unconditional validity of its central assumption shown, Neumann's proof is fully resurrected.

arXiv:2105.13996•May 27, 2021•0 citations

On the Determinism of Hidden Variable Theories with Strict Correlation and Conditional Statistical Independence of Observables

Patrick Suppes, Mario Zanotti

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1976•47 citations
The impossibility of making quantum mechanics deterministic by adding ‘hidden variables’ was discussed by J. von Neumann in 1932. His proof of the impossibility of dispersion-free ensembles was criticized as being logically circular, by Grete Hermann soon after, and as fundamentally flawed, by John Bell in 1964. Bell’s severe criticism and an explicit counter-example are generally considered as the definitive demonstration that J. von Neumann’s proof is inadequate. I show, without using the formalism of quantum mechanics, that J. von Neumann’s central assumption of the linear additivity of the expectation values, even for incompatible (noncommuting) observables, is a necessary consequence that follows directly from the fundamental conservation laws of physical quantities, applicable universally. With this result, J. von Neumann’s result is fully resurrected. I identify the physical reason why dispersion-free ensembles cannot exist. After discussing the conflict of Bell’s counter-example with the factual mechanics, I highlight the result that the local hidden variable theories, for which the Bell’s inequalities were derived, are grossly incompatible with the fundamental conservation laws. In a scrutiny of the vital difference between the ‘causal incompleteness’ of quantum mechanics, discussed by J. von Neumann, and the ‘representational incompleteness’ discussed by Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen, I prove the striking demarcating result that a multi-particle system that is considered causally completed can remain EPR-incomplete. I identify the wave nature of the action as the reason behind the irreducible quantum dispersion and the impossibility of dispersion-free ensembles.
The impossibility of theories with hidden variables as an alternative and replacement for quantum mechanics was discussed by J. von Neumann in 1932. His proof was criticized as being logically circular, by Grete Hermann soon after, and as fundamentally flawed, by John Bell in 1964. Bell's severe criticism of Neumann's proof and the explicit (counter) example of a hidden variable model for the measurement of a quantum spin are considered by most researchers, though not all, as the definitive demonstration that Neumann's proof is inadequate. Despite being an argument of mathematical physics, an ambiguity of decision remains to this day. I show that Neumann's assumption of the linear additivity of the expectation values, even for incompatible (noncommuting) observables, is a necessary constraint related to the nature of observable physical variables and to the conservation laws. Therefore, any theory should necessarily obey it to qualify as a physically valid theory. Then, obviously, the hidden variable theories with dispersion-free ensembles that violate this assumption are ruled out. I show that it is Bell's counter-example that is fundamentally flawed, being inconsistent with the factual mechanics. Further, it is shown that the local hidden variable theories, for which the Bell's inequalities were derived, are grossly incompatible with the fundamental conservation laws. I identify the intrinsic uncertainty in the action as the reason for the irreducible dispersion, which implies that there are no dispersion-free ensembles at any scale of mechanics. With the unconditional validity of its central assumption shown, Neumann's proof is fully resurrected.