Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Inaccuracy in Quantum State Tomography - What is To Be Done? [PowerPoint]

Travis L. Scholten

Published Oct 1, 2015• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Inaccuracy in Quantum State Tomography - What is to Be Done?

Travis L. Scholten

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Oct 16, 2015•0 citations

Quantum state tomography with measurement imperfections and decoherence

Pierre Six, Philippe Campagne-Ibarcq, I. Dotsenko +3 more

•Oct 6, 2015•0 citations

Towards a Model Selection Rule for Quantum State Tomography

Travis L. Scholten, Robin Blume-Kohout

How do boundaries affect loglikelihood ratios?Correct measure of error/inaccuracy?How to handle big data and many parameters?

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 14, 2016•0 citations

Experimental Adaptive Bayesian Tomography

G. I. Struchalin, Ivan Pogorelov, Konstantin Kravtsov +3 more

We discuss an experimental realization of an adaptive quantum state tomography protocol. The method we suggested and tested takes advantage of a Bayesian approach to statistical inference and is naturally tailored for adaptive strategies. For pure states we observe close to 1/N scaling of infidelity with overall number of registered events N, while best non-adaptive protocols allow for 1 N scaling only. This is the theoretical limit for any tomographic protocol, and further improvement may only affect pre-factors in this power law. Also we consider particular strategies of the state reconstruction based on adequate and inadequate models and compare their scaling. Experiments have been performed for polarization qubits and ququarts, but the approach is readily adapted to any dimension. Our method does not take into account systematic errors caused, for example, by inaccuracies in retardant plates rotation. However for the reached values of infidelities of on the order of 10 – 10 we did not observe any deviations from expected behavior and were not able to identify the influence of systematic errors.

EPJ Web of Conferences•Jan 1, 2015•0 citations

Tomographing Quantum State Tomography.

Travis L. Scholten

•Jul 25, 2017•0 citations

Efficient quantum state tomography

M. Cramer, Martin Bodo Plenio, Steven T. Flammia +6 more

arXiv:1101.4366•Nature Communications•Dec 21, 2010•671 citations
We discuss an experimental realization of an adaptive quantum state tomography protocol. The method we suggested and tested takes advantage of a Bayesian approach to statistical inference and is naturally tailored for adaptive strategies. For pure states we observe close to 1/N scaling of infidelity with overall number of registered events N, while best non-adaptive protocols allow for 1 N scaling only. This is the theoretical limit for any tomographic protocol, and further improvement may only affect pre-factors in this power law. Also we consider particular strategies of the state reconstruction based on adequate and inadequate models and compare their scaling. Experiments have been performed for polarization qubits and ququarts, but the approach is readily adapted to any dimension. Our method does not take into account systematic errors caused, for example, by inaccuracies in retardant plates rotation. However for the reached values of infidelities of on the order of 10 – 10 we did not observe any deviations from expected behavior and were not able to identify the influence of systematic errors.