Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

The Relevance of Sequential Time

Hans Primas

Published Jan 1, 2017• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-47370-3_12

Related papers

The Relevance of Non-Sequential Time

Hans Primas

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2017•0 citations

Optimizing measurement strengths for qubit quasiprobabilities behind out-of-time-ordered correlators

Razieh Mohseninia, José Raúl González Alonso, Justin Dressel

Quasiprobability distributions for out-of-time-ordered correlators are a robust witness of information scrambling, being very relevant to the study of quantum many-body physics, but typically hard to measure. Here a dramatically simplified scheme is presented for the case of sequential qubit measurements, thus opening exciting opportunities.

arXiv:1907.10778•Physical Review A•Dec 27, 2019•24 citations

Quantizing and manipulating time

Sherif Ayman Ali Ashry Ghoneim

•Nov 30, 2024•0 citations

Time, dynamics and probability

Ilya Prigogine

Physicalia Magazine•Jan 1, 1980•0 citations

Sequential measurements of conjugate observables

Claudio Carmeli, Teiko Heinosaari, Alessandro Toigo

We present a unified treatment of sequential measurements of two conjugate observables. Our approach is to derive a mathematical structure theorem for all the relevant covariant instruments. As a consequence of this result, we show that every Weyl–Heisenberg covariant observable can be implemented as a sequential measurement of two conjugate observables. This method is applicable both in finite- and infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, therefore covering sequential spin component measurements as well as position-momentum sequential measurements.

arXiv:1105.4976•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Jun 15, 2011•19 citations

Gleason-Busch theorem for sequential measurements

Kieran Flatt, Stephen Mark Barnett, Sarah Croke

Gleason's theorem is a statement that, given some reasonable assumptions, the Born rule used to calculate probabilities in quantum mechanics is essentially unique [A. M. Gleason, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 6, 885 (1957)]. We show that Gleason's theorem contains within it also the structure of sequential measurements, and along with this the state update rule. We give a small set of axioms, which are physically motivated and analogous to those in Busch's proof of Gleason's theorem [P. Busch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 120403 (2003)], from which the familiar Kraus operator form follows. An axiomatic approach has practical relevance as well as fundamental interest, in making clear those assumptions which underlie the security of quantum communication protocols. Interestingly, the two-time formalism is seen to arise naturally in this approach.

Physical Review A•Dec 20, 2017•7 citations
We present a unified treatment of sequential measurements of two conjugate observables. Our approach is to derive a mathematical structure theorem for all the relevant covariant instruments. As a consequence of this result, we show that every Weyl–Heisenberg covariant observable can be implemented as a sequential measurement of two conjugate observables. This method is applicable both in finite- and infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, therefore covering sequential spin component measurements as well as position-momentum sequential measurements.
Gleason's theorem is a statement that, given some reasonable assumptions, the Born rule used to calculate probabilities in quantum mechanics is essentially unique [A. M. Gleason, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 6, 885 (1957)]. We show that Gleason's theorem contains within it also the structure of sequential measurements, and along with this the state update rule. We give a small set of axioms, which are physically motivated and analogous to those in Busch's proof of Gleason's theorem [P. Busch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 120403 (2003)], from which the familiar Kraus operator form follows. An axiomatic approach has practical relevance as well as fundamental interest, in making clear those assumptions which underlie the security of quantum communication protocols. Interestingly, the two-time formalism is seen to arise naturally in this approach.