Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

``NON(!!!)-'SPOOKY'-ACTION(S)-at-(a)-NON(!!!)-Distance(S)'' AB INITIO/BY DEFINITION NON-``Mysterious'' AUTOMATIC(!!!)-but-NON(!!!)-(Artificial)-``ENTANGLEMENT(S'': Fourier(1822) VERSUS Einstein: WHY???: (k =1/r, w)-``Distance'' Does NOT(!!!) Exist!!!

Edward Siegel

Published Mar 16, 2017• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

ON A POSSIBLE DEFINITION OF ENTANGLEMENT IN ANTISYMMETRIC STATES

Tsubasa Ichikawa, Toshihiko Sasaki, Izumi Tsutsui

•Jul 16, 2012•0 citations

Entanglement and Non‐Locality: Spooky Actions at a Distance

Christopher C. Gerry, Kimberley M. Bruno

This chapter focuses the concepts of entanglement and non-locality. Quantum mechanics has yet another mystery—one that occurs as a consequence of superposition states involving two or more particles or two or more beams of photons. This is referred to as entanglement, also known as non-separability. The existence of entangled states is allowed, and even mandated, by quantum mechanics, and this leads us into yet another mystery: non-locality. It demonstrates how subatomic particles can be put into entangled states which reveal strange correlation effects—the effects being the essence of entanglement. It discusses the EPR argument, from the 1935 paper by Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen; the polarization states of photons; Bell's theorem; and the Hardy–Jordan argument.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Feb 21, 2013•1 citation

Quantum Entanglement !: "...spooky action at a distance."

Paul F. Kisak

•Feb 15, 2016•1 citation

Teichmuller Space Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Friedwardt Winterberg

As Newton’s mysterious action at a distance law of gravity was explained as a Riemannian geometry by Einstein, it is proposed that the likewise mysterious non-local quantum mechanics is explained by the analytic continuation below the Planck length into a complex Teichmüller space. Newton’s theory worked extremely well, as does quantum mechanics, but no satisfactory explanation has been given for quantum mechanics. In one space dimension, sufficient to explain the EPR paradox, the Teichmüller space is reduced to a space of complex Riemann surfaces. Einstein’s curved space-time theory of gravity was confirmed by a tiny departure from Newton’s theory in the motion of the planet Mercury, and an experiment is proposed to demonstrate the possible existence of a Teichmüller space below the Planck length.

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Jan 1, 2013•0 citations

Quantum Entanglement: Spooky Action at a Distance

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Aug 31, 2026•0 citations

What Comes after Entanglement?

Eva Haifa Giraud

Duke University Press eBooks•Oct 18, 2019•34 citations
This chapter focuses the concepts of entanglement and non-locality. Quantum mechanics has yet another mystery—one that occurs as a consequence of superposition states involving two or more particles or two or more beams of photons. This is referred to as entanglement, also known as non-separability. The existence of entangled states is allowed, and even mandated, by quantum mechanics, and this leads us into yet another mystery: non-locality. It demonstrates how subatomic particles can be put into entangled states which reveal strange correlation effects—the effects being the essence of entanglement. It discusses the EPR argument, from the 1935 paper by Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen; the polarization states of photons; Bell's theorem; and the Hardy–Jordan argument.
As Newton’s mysterious action at a distance law of gravity was explained as a Riemannian geometry by Einstein, it is proposed that the likewise mysterious non-local quantum mechanics is explained by the analytic continuation below the Planck length into a complex Teichmüller space. Newton’s theory worked extremely well, as does quantum mechanics, but no satisfactory explanation has been given for quantum mechanics. In one space dimension, sufficient to explain the EPR paradox, the Teichmüller space is reduced to a space of complex Riemann surfaces. Einstein’s curved space-time theory of gravity was confirmed by a tiny departure from Newton’s theory in the motion of the planet Mercury, and an experiment is proposed to demonstrate the possible existence of a Teichmüller space below the Planck length.