Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

To the Map of Science and the Quantum Physics Consistency

Dmitri Martila

Published May 1, 2017• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

With all diversity of the Theoretical Physics, there is no problem to reconcile the Nature with reality.

Related papers

Particle-Wave Duality in the Macroscopic World

Arnaldo Pinto Guedes de Paiva Neto

This work presents an option to unite different perspectives of reality. Through literature review and considerations of visible manifestation of light and other physical effects, the author evaluates if quantum effect shows up in our daily life. Reality is an overlap of waves which our brain utilizes to produce individual perception. It is not so bizarre to consider the interference pattern of particles if we characterize the visual experience as a momentary photograph of that wave. Science is multi-disciplinary, so we attempt to reconcile diverse areas of knowledge.

Scientific GOD Journal•Mar 31, 2020•0 citations

The Nature of Reality as Illuminated by Quantum Physics

Palgrave Macmillan eBooks•Dec 6, 2013•0 citations

The Complementary Nature of the Quantum Theory

George Birtwistle

Nature•Jul 14, 1928•0 citations

The Integration of Mind into Physics

Henry Pierce Stapp

The proper goal of science is a unified theory of all of nature, including our thoughts. An adequate theory of this kind will resolve the quantum measurement problem, which is to reconcile the nonclassical character of the quantum world with the classical character of our perceptions of it. A framework for such a theory is described. It weds the opposing views of Bohr and Einstein. Bohr held that quantum theory provides rules that relate aspects of our knowledge, while Einstein claimed that basic theory should describe what could be reality itself, not merely our knowledge of it.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences•Apr 1, 1995•6 citations

There are many ways of theory (and none of them interpreting quantum quite makes sense)

Philip Ball

•Sep 21, 2020•0 citations

Potentiality realism: a realistic and indeterministic physics based on propensities

Flavio Del Santo, Nicolas Gisin

Abstract We propose an interpretation of physics named potentiality realism . This view, which can be applied to classical as well as to quantum physics, regards potentialities (i.e. intrinsic, objective propensities for individual events to obtain) as elements of reality, thereby complementing the actual properties taken by physical variables. This allows one to naturally reconcile realism and fundamental indeterminism in any theoretical framework. We discuss our specific interpretation of propensities, that require them to depart from being probabilities at the formal level, though allowing for statistics and the law of large numbers. This view helps reconcile classical and quantum physics by showing that most of the conceptual problems that are customarily taken to be unique issues of the latter -- such as the measurement problem -- are actually in common to all indeterministic physical theories.

arXiv:2305.02429•European Journal for Philosophy of Science•Dec 1, 2023•10 citations
This work presents an option to unite different perspectives of reality. Through literature review and considerations of visible manifestation of light and other physical effects, the author evaluates if quantum effect shows up in our daily life. Reality is an overlap of waves which our brain utilizes to produce individual perception. It is not so bizarre to consider the interference pattern of particles if we characterize the visual experience as a momentary photograph of that wave. Science is multi-disciplinary, so we attempt to reconcile diverse areas of knowledge.
The proper goal of science is a unified theory of all of nature, including our thoughts. An adequate theory of this kind will resolve the quantum measurement problem, which is to reconcile the nonclassical character of the quantum world with the classical character of our perceptions of it. A framework for such a theory is described. It weds the opposing views of Bohr and Einstein. Bohr held that quantum theory provides rules that relate aspects of our knowledge, while Einstein claimed that basic theory should describe what could be reality itself, not merely our knowledge of it.
Abstract We propose an interpretation of physics named potentiality realism . This view, which can be applied to classical as well as to quantum physics, regards potentialities (i.e. intrinsic, objective propensities for individual events to obtain) as elements of reality, thereby complementing the actual properties taken by physical variables. This allows one to naturally reconcile realism and fundamental indeterminism in any theoretical framework. We discuss our specific interpretation of propensities, that require them to depart from being probabilities at the formal level, though allowing for statistics and the law of large numbers. This view helps reconcile classical and quantum physics by showing that most of the conceptual problems that are customarily taken to be unique issues of the latter -- such as the measurement problem -- are actually in common to all indeterministic physical theories.