Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

The Road Untraveled: Enlarging the New Logical Framework of Complementarity

Menas C. Kafatos, Robert L. Nadeau

Published Jan 1, 1990• 6 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4684-0360-2_8

Related papers

The Logic of Complementarity

Newton C. A. da Costa, Décio Krause

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2006•26 citations

The Logic of Nature: Complementarity and the New Biology

Menas C. Kafatos, Robert L. Nadeau

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2000•0 citations

A Logical Formulation of Complementarity : On the Consistent History Approach

晋吾 藤田

•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

Beyond Complementarity

Ruth E. Kastner

WORLD SCIENTIFIC (EUROPE) eBooks•Apr 14, 2019•1 citation

Specker’s parable of the overprotective seer: A road to contextuality, nonlocality and complementarity

Yeong-Cherng Liang, Robert W. Spekkens, Howard M. Wiseman

arXiv:1010.1273•Physics Reports•May 20, 2011•265 citations

Q-spaces and the foundations of quantum mechanics

Graciela Domenech, Federico Holik, Décio Krause

Our aim in this paper is to take quite seriously Heinz Post’s claim that the non-individuality and the indiscernibility of quantum objects should be introduced right at the start, and not made a posteriori by introducing symmetry conditions. Using a different mathematical framework, namely, quasi-set theory, we avoid working within a labeltensor-product-vector-space-formalism, to use Redhead and Teller’s \nwords, and get a more intuitive way of dealing with the formalism of quantum mechanics, although the underlying logic should be modified. Thus, this paper can be regarded as a tentative to follow and enlarge Heinsenberg’s suggestion that new phenomena require the formation of a new “closed” (that is, axiomatic) theory, coping also with the physical theory’s underlying logic and mathematics.

•Dec 1, 2008•43 citations
Our aim in this paper is to take quite seriously Heinz Post’s claim that the non-individuality and the indiscernibility of quantum objects should be introduced right at the start, and not made a posteriori by introducing symmetry conditions. Using a different mathematical framework, namely, quasi-set theory, we avoid working within a labeltensor-product-vector-space-formalism, to use Redhead and Teller’s \nwords, and get a more intuitive way of dealing with the formalism of quantum mechanics, although the underlying logic should be modified. Thus, this paper can be regarded as a tentative to follow and enlarge Heinsenberg’s suggestion that new phenomena require the formation of a new “closed” (that is, axiomatic) theory, coping also with the physical theory’s underlying logic and mathematics.