Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Comment on "no-signaling condition and quantum dynamics".

Christoph Simon, Vladimír Bužek, Nicolas Gisin

Published Jan 1, 2003• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Comment on ?quantum formalism via signal analysis?

Roland Sypel

Foundations of Physics Letters•Oct 1, 1991•1 citation

No-Signaling in Quantum Mechanics

Mátyás Koniorczyk, András Bodor

Journal of Russian Laser Research•Jul 1, 2018•3 citations

Comment on “No-Signaling Condition and Quantum Dynamics”

Pavel Bóna

This paper contains a criticism of the article: Ch. Simon, V. Buzek and N. Gisin: ``No-Signaling Condition and Quantum Dynamics'', Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 170405, containing a proposal of adoption into quantum mechanics (QM) a new basic axiom. This axiom was declared to imply linearity of time evolution in QM on the basis of kinematic assumptions only. It is shown why, under the considered conditions, the axiom called ``no-signaling condition'' is not effective.

arXiv:quant-ph/0201002•Physical Review Letters•May 21, 2003•5 citations

Critique of "No-Signaling Condition and Quantum Dynamics"

George Svetlichny

We comment on the article of Ch. Simon, V. Buzek and N. Gisin: ``No-Signaling Condition and Quantum Dynamics'', Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 170405, which argues that linearity of quantum mechanics follows from lack of superluminal signals and some usual hypotheses about measurements. We argue that such assumptions in the end are ineffective as an explanation of the linearity of quantum mechanics.

arXiv:quant-ph/0208049•Aug 7, 2002•3 citations

A Control Look at Quantum Computing [About this Issue]

Rodolphe J. Sepulchre

IEEE Control Systems•Nov 13, 2024•0 citations

Consequences of a dynamical no-signaling condition for classical-quantum interactions

S. Camalet

Hybrid classical-quantum approaches are instrumental in numerous fields, from condensed matter physics to quantum information science. We recently proposed to describe hybrid systems starting from a set of natural axioms for measurement probabilities without adding any underlying mathematical structure. The so defined probability measures fulfill a no-signaling condition that ensures that instantaneous communication is impossible. We formulate here a dynamical generalization of this condition. It means that, for two independent systems, the outcome probabilities of a measurement made on one of them are not affected by a measurement performed earlier on the other. Analogous requirements are satisfied for usual classical and quantum bipartite systems and violating them would make faster-than-light signaling possible. The dynamical no-signaling condition has important consequences for classical-quantum interactions that depend on the hybrid approach used. For no-signaling hybrid dynamics with classical trajectories, the classical degrees of freedom can influence the quantum ones but the latter cannot react on the former. If pure states of quantum systems remain pure then the dynamical no-signaling condition implies the absence of classical reaction. When all hybrid states are allowed, there are no genuine classical-quantum interactions for no-signaling hybrid dynamics that do not generate correlations between the classical and the quantum degrees of freedom. In all these cases, the proposed condition is equivalent to the convex-linearity of the probability measure transformations describing finite-time evolutions.

quant-pharXiv:2608.07245•Aug 10, 2026•0 citations
Hybrid classical-quantum approaches are instrumental in numerous fields, from condensed matter physics to quantum information science. We recently proposed to describe hybrid systems starting from a set of natural axioms for measurement probabilities without adding any underlying mathematical structure. The so defined probability measures fulfill a no-signaling condition that ensures that instantaneous communication is impossible. We formulate here a dynamical generalization of this condition. It means that, for two independent systems, the outcome probabilities of a measurement made on one of them are not affected by a measurement performed earlier on the other. Analogous requirements are satisfied for usual classical and quantum bipartite systems and violating them would make faster-than-light signaling possible. The dynamical no-signaling condition has important consequences for classical-quantum interactions that depend on the hybrid approach used. For no-signaling hybrid dynamics with classical trajectories, the classical degrees of freedom can influence the quantum ones but the latter cannot react on the former. If pure states of quantum systems remain pure then the dynamical no-signaling condition implies the absence of classical reaction. When all hybrid states are allowed, there are no genuine classical-quantum interactions for no-signaling hybrid dynamics that do not generate correlations between the classical and the quantum degrees of freedom. In all these cases, the proposed condition is equivalent to the convex-linearity of the probability measure transformations describing finite-time evolutions.