Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Controlling Luttinger Liquid Physics in Spin Ladders under Magnetic Field

C. Berthier, M. Klanj vsek, H. Mayaffre, BRUNETTO CHIARI, O. Piovesana, Pierre Bouillot, Thierry Giamarchi, Corinna Kollath, E. Orignac, R. Citro

Published Mar 16, 2009• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Controlling Luttinger liquid physics in weakly coupled spin ladders under magnetic field

M. Klanjšek, H. Mayaffre, C. Berthier +8 more

•Apr 16, 2008•0 citations

Luttinger liquid physics in the spin ladder material

M. Klanjšek, H. Mayaffre, C. Berthier +8 more

•Jan 1, 2010•0 citations

Luttinger--liquid and BEC physics in spin ladders

Christian Rüegg

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 24, 2011•0 citations

The separated spin-charge Luttinger liquid in a magnetic field

Kai-Hua Yang, Bin Chen, Yunfeng Sun +1 more

Physica C Superconductivity•Nov 1, 2000•0 citations

Controlling Luttinger Liquid Physics in Spin Ladders under a Magnetic Field

M. Klanjšek, H. Mayaffre, C. Berthier +8 more

We present a 14N nuclear magnetic resonance study of a single crystal of CuBr4(C5H12N)2 (BPCB) consisting of weakly coupled spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnetic ladders. Treating ladders in the gapless phase as Luttinger liquids, we are able to fully account for (i) the magnetic field dependence of the nuclear spin-lattice relaxation rate T1(-1) at 250 mK and for (ii) the phase transition to a 3D ordered phase occurring below 110 mK due to weak interladder exchange coupling. BPCB is thus an excellent model system where the possibility to control Luttinger liquid parameters in a continuous manner is demonstrated and the Luttinger liquid model tested in detail over the whole fermion band.

arXiv:0804.2639•Physical Review Letters•Sep 26, 2008•217 citations

Luttinger liquid physics in the spin ladder material CuBr4(C5H12N)2

M. Klanjšek, H. Mayaffre, C. Berthier +8 more

Abstract We present a 14N nuclear magnetic resonance study of a single crystal of CuBr4(C5H12N)2 consisting of weakly coupled spin‐1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnetic ladders. When placed in a magnetic field, such a ladder is theoretically predicted to exhibit a quantum critical Luttinger liquid (LL) behaviour in the gapless phase, i.e. between the two critical fields. Treating ladders as LLs and interaction between them as a perturbation, we are indeed able to fully account for (i) the spin dynamics accessed by measuring the spin–lattice relaxation rate $T_1^{ - 1}$ , and for (ii) the phase transition to a 3D ordered phase occurring below 110 mK due to the weak interladder coupling.

physica status solidi (b)•Feb 8, 2010•8 citations
We present a 14N nuclear magnetic resonance study of a single crystal of CuBr4(C5H12N)2 (BPCB) consisting of weakly coupled spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnetic ladders. Treating ladders in the gapless phase as Luttinger liquids, we are able to fully account for (i) the magnetic field dependence of the nuclear spin-lattice relaxation rate T1(-1) at 250 mK and for (ii) the phase transition to a 3D ordered phase occurring below 110 mK due to weak interladder exchange coupling. BPCB is thus an excellent model system where the possibility to control Luttinger liquid parameters in a continuous manner is demonstrated and the Luttinger liquid model tested in detail over the whole fermion band.
Abstract We present a 14N nuclear magnetic resonance study of a single crystal of CuBr4(C5H12N)2 consisting of weakly coupled spin‐1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnetic ladders. When placed in a magnetic field, such a ladder is theoretically predicted to exhibit a quantum critical Luttinger liquid (LL) behaviour in the gapless phase, i.e. between the two critical fields. Treating ladders as LLs and interaction between them as a perturbation, we are indeed able to fully account for (i) the spin dynamics accessed by measuring the spin–lattice relaxation rate T1−1T_1^{ - 1}T1−1​ , and for (ii) the phase transition to a 3D ordered phase occurring below 110 mK due to the weak interladder coupling.