Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences

Group theoretical derivation of the minimal coupling principle

Giuseppe Nisticò

Published Apr 1, 2017• 5 citations
Publisher

Abstract

establish the Quantum Theory of a free particle for which Galileian transformations form a symmetry group, are extended to the case of an interacting particle. In doing so, the obstacles caused by loss of symmetry are overcome. In this approach, specific forms of the wave equation of an interacting particle, including the equation derived from the minimal coupling principle, are implied by particular first-order invariance properties that characterize the interaction with respect to specific subgroups of Galileian transformations; moreover, the possibility of yet unknown forms of the wave equation is left open.

DOI
10.1098/rspa.2016.0629

Related papers

On the group theoretical approach to the Quantum Theory of an interacting spin-0 particle

Giuseppe Nisticò

We point out a difficulty that arises in extending the group theoretical approach that deductively establish the quantum theory of a free particle to the case of an interacting particle. Then we develop an approach which overcomes this difficulty. The result is a theory of an interacting particle where the standard theory is characterized by specific covariance properties related to the interaction.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Jan 25, 2016•1 citation

Minimal electromagnetic coupling in elementary quantum mechanics; a group theoretical derivation

Henk Hoogland

The equation of motion of a spinless quantum particle in an external uniform parallel electromagnetic field is derived from the symmetry of the field by group theoretical techniques. The minimal coupling is obtained directly, without a detour via the free particle equation. This derivation, which is valid in a Galilean as well as in a Poincare framework, is a contribution to the recasting process of quantum mechanics in the spirit of a paper by Levy-Leblond (1975).

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•May 1, 1978•17 citations

The Formalism of Quantum Mechanics Specified by Covariance Properties

Giuseppe Nisticò, Luigi Accardi, Guillaume Adenier +5 more

The known methods, due for instance to G.W. Mackey and T.F. Jordan, which exploit the transformation properties with respect to the Euclidean and Galileian group to determine the formalism of the Quantum Theory of a localizable particle, fail in the case that the considered transformations are not symmetries of the physical system. In the present work we show that the formalism of standard Quantum Mechanics for a particle without spin can be completely recovered by exploiting the covariance properties with respect to the group of Euclidean transformations, without requiring that these transformations are symmetries of the physical system.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

On local and global equivalence of wave functions in quantum mechanics

Henk Hoogland

de totstandkordng van dit proefschriftThis thesis consists of four parts.Notes and references are given at the end of each part.In part I we will give a review of the various notions of "representation" and "equivalence" that are used in theoretical physics and we will give a precise definition of the concept of "gauge equivalence".There we will meet the notion of gauge matrix.A method will be developed for obtaining the gauge matrices up to equivalence, as this is necessary in order to find the gauge equivalence classes of representations.In this method we will use the concept of superequivalence of group exponents, generalised here to group multipliers.Part I has a rather abstract mathematical character.Its results will be applied to physically interesting symmetry groups in the subsequent parts, where the notation and terminology of part I will be used freely.In part II we will consider the Poincaré as well as the Galilei symmetry group of uniform parallel electromagnetic fields.We will see that there are representations of these groups that are projectively equivalent, but that describe particles which arc, indeed, not "equivalent in every physical aspect".Specifically, particles in different Landau levels are described by projectively equivalent representations.However, those particles are not at all equivalent from the physical point of view; a transition between different Landau levels is not a trivial transformation of the mathematical description but it is a physical process that involves emission or absorption of energy.This is one of the most striking examples showing that, in general, projective equivalence of representations does not correspond to equivalence of physical systems.On the other hand, the different -13 -Landau levels are inequivalent with respect to the gauge equivalence concept.Another example which shows that gauge equivalence corresponds better than projective equivalence to "equivalence in every physical aspect" is provided by particles with different masses in uniform parallel electromagnetic fields (with Ε φ 0) in the Poincaré theory.Surprisingly, these particles are described by projectively equivalent representations; these representations are, however, gauge inequivalent.As a by-product we will find in part II what might be called a group theoretical derivation of the minimal coupling of a spinless particle in uniform parallel electromagnetic fields.Traditionally, the minimal coupling in quantum mechanics is "derived" by correspondence with classical mechanics.A derivation has also been given by a pseudo-invariance argument using instantaneous transformations.Although the latter argument may be the best that is available for arbitrary electromagnetic fields (that break space-time symmetry) it is in fact a "waste" of invariance in those cases where a special field is present that preserves a part of the symmetry.Indeed, in part II we obtain the minimal coupling in the Schrödinger and Klein-Gordon equations from the (exact rather than pseudo) symmetry group of the uniform parallel fields, without the detour via the free particle equations and without the "trick" of the substitution ІЭ ->• ІЭ -eA.This may be seen as a contribution to the process of remodelling traditional quantum mechanics by modern (group) theoretical tools.In part III other uniform electromagnetic fields are considered which are particular, in the sense that their connected symmetry groups are not isomorphic to the connected symmetry group of the uniform parallel fields.These are the uniform crossed fields under the Poincaré group and the uniform electric fields under the Galilei group.The equations -14of motion, including the minimal coupling, will be derived from the symmetry, analogous to part II.We will find a "Galilean subdynamics" for a Poincaré particle in uniform crossed fields.The exponents of the symmetry groups will give rise to an unexpected parameter in the equations of motion, which can be interpreted in terms of an anisotropic mass, corresponding to the anisotropy of the physical system due to the external field.In part IV we apply the notion of gauge equivalence of locally operating representations to some cosmologica!symmetry groups, operating on curved universes.For these groups the notion of superequivalence of group exponents plays a non-trivial role in the determination of a complete set of inequivalent gauge matrices.We will find that in cosmologica!models with one space dimension a free particle and a particle in an external field are described by projective representations of the symmetry group that are projectively equivalent but gauge inequivalent.This shows once more that the concept of gauge equivalence of locally operating representations is a more natural concept for the description of physical systems than that of the simple projective equivalence.As a by-product we will find that the minimal coupling is not necessarily the correct description of the interaction of a charged particle in an external field in a (relativistic) cosmologica!space-time.

•Jan 1, 1977•2 citations

Second-quantization and irreducible tensorial sets

Z. Rudzikas

General remarks As already mentioned in the Introduction, the exact solution of the main equation of quantum mechanics – the Schrödinger equation – lies beyond the potentialities of modern mathematics and computer technology. But a number of important inferences about the behaviour, structure and properties of a given quantum-mechanical many-particle system can be drawn without solving this equation, just by examining its symmetry properties. Symmetry concepts come about in physics in two ways. First, since any physical process occurs in a real space, we have to make use of one or another coordinate system. The isotropy and homogeneity of space make physically meaningful only those mathematical relationships that remain unchanged under rotations of the axes of the coordinate system, and that impose fairly rigorous constraints on the possible physical laws. Second, every physical object and process features a symmetry which should be taken into account by the physical theory. A common idea underlying particular forms of symmetry is the invariance of a system under a certain set (group) of transformations. The normally considered forms of symmetry are rotational symmetry, which is based on the equivalence of all directions in space, and permutation symmetry, which is caused by identical particles. The operations of the geometrical symmetry group are responsible for appropriate conservation laws. So, the rotational symmetry of a closed system gives rise to the law of conservation of angular momentum. The group of rotations of a three-dimensional space stands apart in atomic spectroscopy. This is mostly due to the high accuracy of the central field approximation, on which the entire modern theory of complex atoms and ions is based.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Dec 4, 1997•0 citations

A group theoretical approach to quantum theory of the interaction for a non-relativistic spin-0 particle

Giuseppe Nisticò

We show a possibility of extending the group theoretical approach which deductively establish the quantum theory of a free particle, developed in particular by Mackey, to the interacting particle case.

arXiv:1411.4127•Nov 15, 2014•0 citations
establish the Quantum Theory of a free particle for which Galileian transformations form a symmetry group, are extended to the case of an interacting particle. In doing so, the obstacles caused by loss of symmetry are overcome. In this approach, specific forms of the wave equation of an interacting particle, including the equation derived from the minimal coupling principle, are implied by particular first-order invariance properties that characterize the interaction with respect to specific subgroups of Galileian transformations; moreover, the possibility of yet unknown forms of the wave equation is left open.
The known methods, due for instance to G.W. Mackey and T.F. Jordan, which exploit the transformation properties with respect to the Euclidean and Galileian group to determine the formalism of the Quantum Theory of a localizable particle, fail in the case that the considered transformations are not symmetries of the physical system. In the present work we show that the formalism of standard Quantum Mechanics for a particle without spin can be completely recovered by exploiting the covariance properties with respect to the group of Euclidean transformations, without requiring that these transformations are symmetries of the physical system.
de totstandkordng van dit proefschriftThis thesis consists of four parts.Notes and references are given at the end of each part.In part I we will give a review of the various notions of "representation" and "equivalence" that are used in theoretical physics and we will give a precise definition of the concept of "gauge equivalence".There we will meet the notion of gauge matrix.A method will be developed for obtaining the gauge matrices up to equivalence, as this is necessary in order to find the gauge equivalence classes of representations.In this method we will use the concept of superequivalence of group exponents, generalised here to group multipliers.Part I has a rather abstract mathematical character.Its results will be applied to physically interesting symmetry groups in the subsequent parts, where the notation and terminology of part I will be used freely.In part II we will consider the Poincaré as well as the Galilei symmetry group of uniform parallel electromagnetic fields.We will see that there are representations of these groups that are projectively equivalent, but that describe particles which arc, indeed, not "equivalent in every physical aspect".Specifically, particles in different Landau levels are described by projectively equivalent representations.However, those particles are not at all equivalent from the physical point of view; a transition between different Landau levels is not a trivial transformation of the mathematical description but it is a physical process that involves emission or absorption of energy.This is one of the most striking examples showing that, in general, projective equivalence of representations does not correspond to equivalence of physical systems.On the other hand, the different -13 -Landau levels are inequivalent with respect to the gauge equivalence concept.Another example which shows that gauge equivalence corresponds better than projective equivalence to "equivalence in every physical aspect" is provided by particles with different masses in uniform parallel electromagnetic fields (with Ε φ 0) in the Poincaré theory.Surprisingly, these particles are described by projectively equivalent representations; these representations are, however, gauge inequivalent.As a by-product we will find in part II what might be called a group theoretical derivation of the minimal coupling of a spinless particle in uniform parallel electromagnetic fields.Traditionally, the minimal coupling in quantum mechanics is "derived" by correspondence with classical mechanics.A derivation has also been given by a pseudo-invariance argument using instantaneous transformations.Although the latter argument may be the best that is available for arbitrary electromagnetic fields (that break space-time symmetry) it is in fact a "waste" of invariance in those cases where a special field is present that preserves a part of the symmetry.Indeed, in part II we obtain the minimal coupling in the Schrödinger and Klein-Gordon equations from the (exact rather than pseudo) symmetry group of the uniform parallel fields, without the detour via the free particle equations and without the "trick" of the substitution ІЭ ->• ІЭ -eA.This may be seen as a contribution to the process of remodelling traditional quantum mechanics by modern (group) theoretical tools.In part III other uniform electromagnetic fields are considered which are particular, in the sense that their connected symmetry groups are not isomorphic to the connected symmetry group of the uniform parallel fields.These are the uniform crossed fields under the Poincaré group and the uniform electric fields under the Galilei group.The equations -14of motion, including the minimal coupling, will be derived from the symmetry, analogous to part II.We will find a "Galilean subdynamics" for a Poincaré particle in uniform crossed fields.The exponents of the symmetry groups will give rise to an unexpected parameter in the equations of motion, which can be interpreted in terms of an anisotropic mass, corresponding to the anisotropy of the physical system due to the external field.In part IV we apply the notion of gauge equivalence of locally operating representations to some cosmologica!symmetry groups, operating on curved universes.For these groups the notion of superequivalence of group exponents plays a non-trivial role in the determination of a complete set of inequivalent gauge matrices.We will find that in cosmologica!models with one space dimension a free particle and a particle in an external field are described by projective representations of the symmetry group that are projectively equivalent but gauge inequivalent.This shows once more that the concept of gauge equivalence of locally operating representations is a more natural concept for the description of physical systems than that of the simple projective equivalence.As a by-product we will find that the minimal coupling is not necessarily the correct description of the interaction of a charged particle in an external field in a (relativistic) cosmologica!space-time.
General remarks As already mentioned in the Introduction, the exact solution of the main equation of quantum mechanics – the Schrödinger equation – lies beyond the potentialities of modern mathematics and computer technology. But a number of important inferences about the behaviour, structure and properties of a given quantum-mechanical many-particle system can be drawn without solving this equation, just by examining its symmetry properties. Symmetry concepts come about in physics in two ways. First, since any physical process occurs in a real space, we have to make use of one or another coordinate system. The isotropy and homogeneity of space make physically meaningful only those mathematical relationships that remain unchanged under rotations of the axes of the coordinate system, and that impose fairly rigorous constraints on the possible physical laws. Second, every physical object and process features a symmetry which should be taken into account by the physical theory. A common idea underlying particular forms of symmetry is the invariance of a system under a certain set (group) of transformations. The normally considered forms of symmetry are rotational symmetry, which is based on the equivalence of all directions in space, and permutation symmetry, which is caused by identical particles. The operations of the geometrical symmetry group are responsible for appropriate conservation laws. So, the rotational symmetry of a closed system gives rise to the law of conservation of angular momentum. The group of rotations of a three-dimensional space stands apart in atomic spectroscopy. This is mostly due to the high accuracy of the central field approximation, on which the entire modern theory of complex atoms and ions is based.