Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Information and Measurement (QIM)

Quantum key distribution secure against partly malicious devices

Marcos Curty, Hoi‐Kwong Lo

Published Jan 1, 2017• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We show that using verifiable secret sharing and multiple optical devices and classical post-processing units, one could re-establish the security of quantum key distribution against covert channels and partly malicious classical post-processing units.
DOI
10.1364/qim.2017.qf3b.4

Related papers

Foiling covert channels and malicious classical post-processing units in quantum key distribution

Marcos Curty, Hoi‐Kwong Lo

Abstract The existing paradigm for the security of quantum key distribution (QKD) suffers from two fundamental weaknesses. First, covert channels have emerged as an important threat and have attracted a lot of attention in security research in conventional information and communication systems. Covert channels (e.g. memory attacks) can fatally break the security of even device-independent quantum key distribution (DI-QKD), whenever QKD devices are re-used. Second, it is often implicitly assumed that the classical post-processing units of a QKD system are trusted. This is a rather strong assumption and is very hard to justify in practice. Here, we propose a new paradigm for the security of QKD that addresses these two fundamental problems. Specifically, we show that by using verifiable secret sharing and multiple optical devices and classical post-processing units, one could re-establish the security of QKD. Our techniques are rather general and they apply to both DI-QKD and non-DI-QKD.

arXiv:1711.08724•npj Quantum Information•Feb 6, 2019•35 citations

Quantum cryptography with malicious devices

Marcos Curty, Hoi‐Kwong Lo

The current paradigm for the security of quantum key distribution (QKD) relies on the legitimate users of the system trusting their devices, which include both the quantum communication components and the classical post-processing units. However, in view of the memory attacks recently proposed against device-independent QKD, as well as the many hardware and software Trojan Horse attacks that threaten the security of conventional cryptography today, such trust is a very strong and unjustified assumption. Here we review a recent proposal to solve this problem based on the use of verifiable secret sharing and redundancies. We show that this approach can deliver secret key rates which are comparable to those obtained in an ideal scenario with honest devices.

SPIE Quantum Information Science and Technology•Oct 8, 2018•1 citation

Security of Quantum Key Distribution

Normand J. Beaudry, Agnes Ferenczi, Varun Narasimhachar +4 more

Quantum Key Distribution offers the promise of secure communication at unprecedented security level. Secure systems can be implemented by standard optical communication components - if done right. We report on the divide of right and wrong.

Optical Fiber Communication Conference•Jan 1, 2010•10 citations

Towards high-performance quantum key distribution with implementation security

Marcos Curty

In theory, quantum key distribution (QKD) offers information-theoretic secure communications. In practice, however, it does not because most security proofs of QKD use assumptions that are not satisfied by the implementations, and thus their security is seriously threatened by quantum hacking. This includes, for instance, the assumption that the legitimate users of the system have a precise mathematical model to describe the behaviour of their apparatuses, that the systems are located in perfectly shielded labs which prevent any unwanted information to be leaked to the eavesdropper, and that all quantum devices and classical post-processing units are honest and follow the prescriptions of the protocol. Here, we review recent results that significantly relax these unrealistic and hardly feasible requirements, and pave the way towards achieving practical QKD with implementation security and enhanced performance.

•Feb 28, 2020•0 citations

Secure key distribution via pre- and postselected quantum states

Jeffrey Bub

A quantum key distribution scheme whose security depends on the features of pre- and post-selected quantum states is described.

arXiv:quant-ph/0006086•Physical Review A•Feb 14, 2001•20 citations

Experimental Quantum Key Distribution Secure Against Malicious Devices

Wei Li, Víctor Zapatero, Hao Tan +9 more

The fabrication of quantum key distribution (QKD) systems typically involves several parties, thus providing Eve with multiple opportunities to meddle with the devices. As a consequence, conventional hardware and/or software hacking attacks pose natural threats to the security of practical QKD. Fortunately, if the number of corrupted devices is limited, the security can be restored by using redundant apparatuses. Here, we report on the demonstration of a secure QKD setup with optical devices and classical postprocessing units possibly controlled by an eavesdropper. We implement a 1.25 GHz chip-based measurement-device-independent QKD system secure against malicious devices on both the measurement and the users' sides. The secret key rate reaches 137 bps over a 24 dB channel loss. Our setup, benefiting from a high clock rate, miniaturized transmitters, and a cost-effective structure, provides a promising solution for widespread applications requiring uncompromising communication security.

arXiv:2006.12863•Physical Review Applied•Mar 29, 2021•16 citations
Abstract The existing paradigm for the security of quantum key distribution (QKD) suffers from two fundamental weaknesses. First, covert channels have emerged as an important threat and have attracted a lot of attention in security research in conventional information and communication systems. Covert channels (e.g. memory attacks) can fatally break the security of even device-independent quantum key distribution (DI-QKD), whenever QKD devices are re-used. Second, it is often implicitly assumed that the classical post-processing units of a QKD system are trusted. This is a rather strong assumption and is very hard to justify in practice. Here, we propose a new paradigm for the security of QKD that addresses these two fundamental problems. Specifically, we show that by using verifiable secret sharing and multiple optical devices and classical post-processing units, one could re-establish the security of QKD. Our techniques are rather general and they apply to both DI-QKD and non-DI-QKD.
The current paradigm for the security of quantum key distribution (QKD) relies on the legitimate users of the system trusting their devices, which include both the quantum communication components and the classical post-processing units. However, in view of the memory attacks recently proposed against device-independent QKD, as well as the many hardware and software Trojan Horse attacks that threaten the security of conventional cryptography today, such trust is a very strong and unjustified assumption. Here we review a recent proposal to solve this problem based on the use of verifiable secret sharing and redundancies. We show that this approach can deliver secret key rates which are comparable to those obtained in an ideal scenario with honest devices.
In theory, quantum key distribution (QKD) offers information-theoretic secure communications. In practice, however, it does not because most security proofs of QKD use assumptions that are not satisfied by the implementations, and thus their security is seriously threatened by quantum hacking. This includes, for instance, the assumption that the legitimate users of the system have a precise mathematical model to describe the behaviour of their apparatuses, that the systems are located in perfectly shielded labs which prevent any unwanted information to be leaked to the eavesdropper, and that all quantum devices and classical post-processing units are honest and follow the prescriptions of the protocol. Here, we review recent results that significantly relax these unrealistic and hardly feasible requirements, and pave the way towards achieving practical QKD with implementation security and enhanced performance.
The fabrication of quantum key distribution (QKD) systems typically involves several parties, thus providing Eve with multiple opportunities to meddle with the devices. As a consequence, conventional hardware and/or software hacking attacks pose natural threats to the security of practical QKD. Fortunately, if the number of corrupted devices is limited, the security can be restored by using redundant apparatuses. Here, we report on the demonstration of a secure QKD setup with optical devices and classical postprocessing units possibly controlled by an eavesdropper. We implement a 1.25 GHz chip-based measurement-device-independent QKD system secure against malicious devices on both the measurement and the users' sides. The secret key rate reaches 137 bps over a 24 dB channel loss. Our setup, benefiting from a high clock rate, miniaturized transmitters, and a cost-effective structure, provides a promising solution for widespread applications requiring uncompromising communication security.