Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Computational codes for simulating the Schr\"{o}dinger equation and the Master equation

Nagendra Dhakal, Michael Leuenberger

Published Mar 24, 2011• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Schrödinger equation versus Master equation

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Aug 1, 2006•0 citations

Schrödinger equation versus Master equation

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jul 31, 2020•0 citations

Method for the Direct Solve of the Many-Body Schr\"{o}dinger Wave Equation

J. Jerke, C. J. Tymczak, Bill Poirier

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 13, 2017•0 citations

Error suppression in Hamiltonian-based quantum computation using energy penalties

Adam D. Bookatz, Edward Farhi, Leo Zhou

We consider the use of quantum error-detecting codes, together with energy penalties against leaving the code space, as a method for suppressing environmentally induced errors in Hamiltonian-based quantum computation. This method was introduced in Jordan et al. [Phys. Rev. A 74, 052322 (2006)] in the context of quantum adiabatic computation, but we consider it more generally. Specifically, we consider a computational Hamiltonian, which has been encoded using the logical qubits of a single-qubit error-detecting code, coupled to an environment of qubits by interaction terms that act one-locally on the system. Additional energy penalty terms penalize states outside of the code space. We prove that in the limit of infinitely large penalties, one-local errors are completely suppressed, and we derive some bounds for the finite penalty case. Our proof technique involves exact integration of the Schrodinger equation, making no use of master equations or their assumptions. We perform long time numerical simulations on a small (one logical qubit) computational system coupled to an environment and the results suggest that the energy penalty method achieves even greater protection than our bounds indicate.

arXiv:1407.1485•Physical Review A•Aug 10, 2015•44 citations

Open systems dynamics: Simulating master equations in the computer

Carlos Navarrete–Benlloch

Master equations are probably the most fundamental equations for anyone working in quantum optics in the presence of dissipation. In this context it is then incredibly useful to have efficient ways of coding and simulating such equations in the computer, and in this notes I try to introduce in a comprehensive way how do I do so, focusing on Matlab, but making it general enough so that it can be directly translated to any other language or software of choice. I inherited most of my methods from Juan José García-Ripoll (whose numerical abilities I cannot praise enough), changing them here and there to accommodate them to the way my (fairly limited) numerical brain works, and to connect them as much as possible to how I understand the theory behind them. At present, the notes focus on how to code master equations and find their steady state, but I hope soon I will be able to update them with time evolution methods, including how to deal with time-dependent master equations. During the last 4 years I've tested these methods in various different contexts, including circuit quantum electrodynamics, the laser problem, optical parametric oscillators, and optomechanical systems. Comments and (constructive) criticism are greatly welcome, and will be properly credited and acknowledged.

arXiv:1504.05266•Apr 21, 2015•25 citations

Improving the One Dimensional Schr\"{o}dinger Equation

Bradley Schorer, Stephen E. Bricher, Joelle Murray

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•May 15, 2009•0 citations
We consider the use of quantum error-detecting codes, together with energy penalties against leaving the code space, as a method for suppressing environmentally induced errors in Hamiltonian-based quantum computation. This method was introduced in Jordan et al. [Phys. Rev. A 74, 052322 (2006)] in the context of quantum adiabatic computation, but we consider it more generally. Specifically, we consider a computational Hamiltonian, which has been encoded using the logical qubits of a single-qubit error-detecting code, coupled to an environment of qubits by interaction terms that act one-locally on the system. Additional energy penalty terms penalize states outside of the code space. We prove that in the limit of infinitely large penalties, one-local errors are completely suppressed, and we derive some bounds for the finite penalty case. Our proof technique involves exact integration of the Schrodinger equation, making no use of master equations or their assumptions. We perform long time numerical simulations on a small (one logical qubit) computational system coupled to an environment and the results suggest that the energy penalty method achieves even greater protection than our bounds indicate.
Master equations are probably the most fundamental equations for anyone working in quantum optics in the presence of dissipation. In this context it is then incredibly useful to have efficient ways of coding and simulating such equations in the computer, and in this notes I try to introduce in a comprehensive way how do I do so, focusing on Matlab, but making it general enough so that it can be directly translated to any other language or software of choice. I inherited most of my methods from Juan José García-Ripoll (whose numerical abilities I cannot praise enough), changing them here and there to accommodate them to the way my (fairly limited) numerical brain works, and to connect them as much as possible to how I understand the theory behind them. At present, the notes focus on how to code master equations and find their steady state, but I hope soon I will be able to update them with time evolution methods, including how to deal with time-dependent master equations. During the last 4 years I've tested these methods in various different contexts, including circuit quantum electrodynamics, the laser problem, optical parametric oscillators, and optomechanical systems. Comments and (constructive) criticism are greatly welcome, and will be properly credited and acknowledged.