Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Acta Physica Sinica

THE CLASSICAL ANALOGY OF UNCERTAINTY RELATION

HUANG XIANG-YOU, 北京大学物理系,北京100871

Published Jan 1, 1996• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

The relation analogous to the uncertainty relation of quantum mechanics also exists in classical mechanics. In this paper by using this relation we calculate several examples. From the results of the calculations it is obvious that a wave function can only describe the ensemble in the classical limit.
DOI
10.7498/aps.45.353

Related papers

ON UNCERTAINTY RELATIONS AND INTERFERENCE IN QUANTUM AND CLASSICAL MECHANICS

Vladimir K. Ignatovich

It is demonstrated that uncertainty relations (UR), being the general property of functions, do not prevent particles in quantum mechanics (QM) to have precisely and simultane-ously defined position and momentum. Classical interpreta-tion of QM, different from Bohmian mechanics is proposed. Concepts of Physics, Vol. III (2006) 11

•Jan 1, 2006•4 citations

Uncertainty Relations (UR) Have Nothing to do with Quantum Mechanics (QM)

Vladimir K. Ignatovich

Uncertainty relations are shown to have nothing specific for quantum mechanics, being the general property valid for arbitrary function. A wave function of a particle having precisely defined position and momentum in QM simultaneously is demonstrated. Interference on two slits in a screen is shown to exist in classical mechanics. A nonlinear classical system of equations replacing QM Schrödinger equation is suggested. This approach is shown to have nothing in common with Bohmian mechanics.

arXiv:quant-ph/0403038•Mar 4, 2004•0 citations

ACTION ANALYSIS OF UNCERTAINTY RELATION OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

Meng Quan

Reunderstands the uncertainty relation of quantum mechanics from another aspect. The uncertainty relation contains the deep going physical essence, and it virtually becomes a criterion of displaying the particle property and wave property of matter in micro world.

Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology•Jan 1, 2000•0 citations

GENERALIZATION OF CLASSICAL STATISTICAL MECHANICS TO QUANTUM MECHANICS AND STABLE PROPERTY OF CONDENSED MATTER

Y. C. HUANG, F. C. MA, N. ZHANG

Classical statistical average values are generally generalized to average values of quantum mechanics. It is discovered that quantum mechanics is a direct generalization of classical statistical mechanics, and we generally deduce both a new general continuous eigenvalue equation and a general discrete eigenvalue equation in quantum mechanics, and discover that a eigenvalue of quantum mechanics is just an extreme value of an operator in possibility distribution, the eigenvalue f is just classical observable quantity. A general classical statistical uncertain relation is further given, and the general classical statistical uncertain relation is generally generalized to the quantum uncertainty principle; the two lost conditions in classical uncertain relation and quantum uncertainty principle, respectively, are found. We generally expound the relations among the uncertainty principle, singularity and condensed matter stability, discover that the quantum uncertainty principle prevents the appearance of singularity of the electromagnetic potential between nucleus and electrons, and give the failure conditions of the quantum uncertainty principle. Finally, we discover that the classical limit of quantum mechanics is classical statistical mechanics, the classical statistical mechanics may further be degenerated to classical mechanics and we discover that merely stating that the classical limit of quantum mechanics is classical mechanics is a mistake. As application examples, we deduce both the Schrödinger equation and the state superposition principle, and deduce that there exists a decoherent factor from a general mathematical representation of the state superposition principle; the consistent difficulty between statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics and determinant property of classical mechanics is overcome.

arXiv:quant-ph/0506078•Modern Physics Letters B•Nov 20, 2004•15 citations

Classical Limit of Quantum Mechanics

Xiang-You Huang

Because of the use of different limiting procedures, there are two conflict conclusions on wave function. One is that a wave function can describe a single particle and the other is that it can only describe an ensemble in the classical limit. In this paper the limiting procedures have been compared. We put the synthesized limit n→∞, →0 but keep E(n, ) to be the actual measured value of energy. Under this limit condition, we can not only prove that a wave function can only describe an ensemble, but also can make clear the dynamical behavior of the particles of the ensemble. Calculations show that the reason why quantum mechanics cannot describe a particle is not because of the motion equation but because of the definition of state for the particle.

Science in China Series A-Mathematics Physics Astronomy & Technological Science•Feb 20, 1993•1 citation

The uncertainty product of position and momentum in classical dynamics

A. R. Usha Devi, H. S. Karthik

It is generally believed that the classical regime emerges as a limiting case of quantum theory. Exploring such quantum-classical correspondences provides a deeper understanding of foundational aspects and has attracted a great deal of attention since the early days of quantum theory. It has been proposed that since a quantum mechanical wave function describes an intrinsic statistical behavior, its classical limit must correspond to a classical ensemble—not to an individual particle. This idea leads us to ask how the uncertainty product of canonical observables in the quantum realm compares with the corresponding dispersions in the classical realm. In this paper, we explore parallels between the uncertainty product of position and momentum in stationary states of quantum systems and the corresponding fluctuations of these observables in the associated classical ensemble. We confine ourselves to one-dimensional conservative systems and show, with the help of suitably defined dimensionless physical quantities, that first and second moments of the canonical observables match with each other in the classical and quantum descriptions—resulting in identical structures for the uncertainty relations in both realms.

arXiv:1108.2682•American Journal of Physics•Jul 17, 2012•6 citations
Classical statistical average values are generally generalized to average values of quantum mechanics. It is discovered that quantum mechanics is a direct generalization of classical statistical mechanics, and we generally deduce both a new general continuous eigenvalue equation and a general discrete eigenvalue equation in quantum mechanics, and discover that a eigenvalue of quantum mechanics is just an extreme value of an operator in possibility distribution, the eigenvalue f is just classical observable quantity. A general classical statistical uncertain relation is further given, and the general classical statistical uncertain relation is generally generalized to the quantum uncertainty principle; the two lost conditions in classical uncertain relation and quantum uncertainty principle, respectively, are found. We generally expound the relations among the uncertainty principle, singularity and condensed matter stability, discover that the quantum uncertainty principle prevents the appearance of singularity of the electromagnetic potential between nucleus and electrons, and give the failure conditions of the quantum uncertainty principle. Finally, we discover that the classical limit of quantum mechanics is classical statistical mechanics, the classical statistical mechanics may further be degenerated to classical mechanics and we discover that merely stating that the classical limit of quantum mechanics is classical mechanics is a mistake. As application examples, we deduce both the Schrödinger equation and the state superposition principle, and deduce that there exists a decoherent factor from a general mathematical representation of the state superposition principle; the consistent difficulty between statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics and determinant property of classical mechanics is overcome.
Because of the use of different limiting procedures, there are two conflict conclusions on wave function. One is that a wave function can describe a single particle and the other is that it can only describe an ensemble in the classical limit. In this paper the limiting procedures have been compared. We put the synthesized limit n→∞, →0 but keep E(n, ) to be the actual measured value of energy. Under this limit condition, we can not only prove that a wave function can only describe an ensemble, but also can make clear the dynamical behavior of the particles of the ensemble. Calculations show that the reason why quantum mechanics cannot describe a particle is not because of the motion equation but because of the definition of state for the particle.
It is generally believed that the classical regime emerges as a limiting case of quantum theory. Exploring such quantum-classical correspondences provides a deeper understanding of foundational aspects and has attracted a great deal of attention since the early days of quantum theory. It has been proposed that since a quantum mechanical wave function describes an intrinsic statistical behavior, its classical limit must correspond to a classical ensemble—not to an individual particle. This idea leads us to ask how the uncertainty product of canonical observables in the quantum realm compares with the corresponding dispersions in the classical realm. In this paper, we explore parallels between the uncertainty product of position and momentum in stationary states of quantum systems and the corresponding fluctuations of these observables in the associated classical ensemble. We confine ourselves to one-dimensional conservative systems and show, with the help of suitably defined dimensionless physical quantities, that first and second moments of the canonical observables match with each other in the classical and quantum descriptions—resulting in identical structures for the uncertainty relations in both realms.