Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Projected Density of Transitions for Heisenberg Models

Roger Haydock, C.M.M. Nex

Published Mar 1, 2012• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

A complete Gutzwiller projection for quantum Heisenberg models

Yong-Cong Chen

Physics Letters A•Mar 1, 1993•1 citation

A Symmetrized Basis for Transitions in the Heisenberg Model

Roger Haydock, C.M.M. Nex

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 22, 2013•0 citations

Quantum phase diagram of spin-1 J1−J2 Heisenberg model on the square lattice: An infinite projected entangled-pair state and density matrix renormalization group study

Reza Haghshenas, Wang-Wei Lan, Shou-Shu Gong +1 more

We study the spin-1 Heisenberg model on the square lattice with the antiferromagnetic nearest-neighbor ${J}_{1}$ and the next-nearest-neighbor ${J}_{2}$ couplings by using the infinite projected entangled-pair state (iPEPS) ansatz and the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) calculation. The iPEPS simulation, which studies the model directly in the thermodynamic limit, finds a crossing of the ground state from the N\'eel magnetic state to the stripe magnetic state at ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.549$, showing a direct phase transition. In the finite-size DMRG calculation on the cylinder geometry up to the cylinder width ${L}_{y}=10$, we find that around the same critical point the N\'eel and the stripe orders are strongly suppressed, which implies the absence of an intermediate phase. Both calculations identify that the stripe order comes with a first-order transition at ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.549$. Our results indicate that unlike the spin-1/2 ${J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{2}$ square model, quantum fluctuations in the spin-1 model may not be strong enough to stabilize an intermediate nonmagnetic phase.

arXiv:1802.00874•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•May 31, 2018•21 citations

Convergent method for calculating the properties of many interacting electrons

Roger Haydock

A method is presented for calculating binding energies and other properties of extended interacting system using the projected density of transitions (PDOT) which is the probability distribution for transitions of different energies induced by a given localized operator, the operator on which the transitions are projected. It is shown that the transition contributing to the PDOT at each energy is the one which disturbs the system least, and so, by projecting on appropriate operators, the binding energies of equilibrium electronic states and the energies of their elementary excitations can be calculated. The PDOT may be expanded as a continued fraction by the recursion method, and as in other cases the continued fraction converges exponentially with the number of arithmetic operations, independent of the size of the system, in contrast to other numerical methods for which the number of operations increases with system size to maintain a given accuracy. These properties are illustrated with a calculation of the binding energies and zone-boundary spin-wave energies for an infinite spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ Heisenberg chain, which is compared with analytic results for this system and extrapolations from finite rings of spins.

arXiv:cond-mat/9910461•Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Mar 15, 2000•10 citations

Phase transitions for the anisotropic Heisenberg model

Harvey S. Leff, Michael Flicker, Kenneth Millard

Physics Letters A•May 1, 1971•3 citations

Reduced density matrices of the anisotropic Heisenberg model

J. Ginibre

Communications in Mathematical Physics•Jun 1, 1968•23 citations
We study the spin-1 Heisenberg model on the square lattice with the antiferromagnetic nearest-neighbor J1{J}_{1}J1​ and the next-nearest-neighbor J2{J}_{2}J2​ couplings by using the infinite projected entangled-pair state (iPEPS) ansatz and the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) calculation. The iPEPS simulation, which studies the model directly in the thermodynamic limit, finds a crossing of the ground state from the N\'eel magnetic state to the stripe magnetic state at ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.549$, showing a direct phase transition. In the finite-size DMRG calculation on the cylinder geometry up to the cylinder width Ly=10{L}_{y}=10Ly​=10, we find that around the same critical point the N\'eel and the stripe orders are strongly suppressed, which implies the absence of an intermediate phase. Both calculations identify that the stripe order comes with a first-order transition at ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.549$. Our results indicate that unlike the spin-1/2 ${J}_{1}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{J}_{2}$ square model, quantum fluctuations in the spin-1 model may not be strong enough to stabilize an intermediate nonmagnetic phase.
A method is presented for calculating binding energies and other properties of extended interacting system using the projected density of transitions (PDOT) which is the probability distribution for transitions of different energies induced by a given localized operator, the operator on which the transitions are projected. It is shown that the transition contributing to the PDOT at each energy is the one which disturbs the system least, and so, by projecting on appropriate operators, the binding energies of equilibrium electronic states and the energies of their elementary excitations can be calculated. The PDOT may be expanded as a continued fraction by the recursion method, and as in other cases the continued fraction converges exponentially with the number of arithmetic operations, independent of the size of the system, in contrast to other numerical methods for which the number of operations increases with system size to maintain a given accuracy. These properties are illustrated with a calculation of the binding energies and zone-boundary spin-wave energies for an infinite spin-12\frac{1}{2}21​ Heisenberg chain, which is compared with analytic results for this system and extrapolations from finite rings of spins.