Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Modal Quantum Theory

Michael D. Westmoreland, Benjamin W. Schumacher

Published Mar 22, 2011• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Modal Quantum Theory

Benjamin W. Schumacher, Michael D. Westmoreland

arXiv:1204.0701•Foundations of Physics•May 16, 2012•40 citations

Modalities and the quantum theory

David D. Horowitz

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Jan 1, 1970•1 citation

Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and Classical Physical Theories

R. S. Ingarden

Springer eBooks•Jul 4, 2007•2 citations

Hidden variables and the modal interpretation of quantum theory

Bas C. van Fraassen

Synthese•Sep 1, 1979•34 citations

Analysing Modality

Alastair Wilson

Abstract This chapter presents and defends the basic tenets of quantum modal realism. The first of these principles, Individualism, states that Everett worlds are metaphysically possible worlds. The converse of this principle, Generality, states that metaphysically possible worlds are Everett worlds. Combining Individualism and Generality yields Alignment, a conjecture about the nature of possible worlds that is closely analogous to Lewisian modal realism. Like Lewisian modal realism, Alignment entails that each possible world is a real concrete individual of the same basic kind as the actual world. These similarities render EQM suitable for grounding a novel theory of the nature of metaphysical modality with some unique properties. Also like Lewisian modal realism, quantum modal realism is a reductive theory: it accounts for modality in fundamentally non-modal terms. But quantum modal realism also has unique epistemological advantages over Lewisian modal realism and other extant realist approaches to modality.

•Feb 11, 2020•0 citations

Cloning, deleting, and hiding in modal quantum theory

Diamond, Phillip, Benjamin W. Schumacher

We examine the toy model of modal quantum theory (MQT), an analogue of actual quantum theory based on finite fields. In particular, we investigate how several essential ``no-go'' results (for cloning, deleting and hiding processes) work in MQT. Cloning and deleting are still forbidden in MQT, though the details of these results are somewhat different in the new context. However, the information of a modal qubit can be completely hidden in the correlations between two entangled modal qubits.

arXiv:2310.04397•Oct 6, 2023•0 citations
Abstract This chapter presents and defends the basic tenets of quantum modal realism. The first of these principles, Individualism, states that Everett worlds are metaphysically possible worlds. The converse of this principle, Generality, states that metaphysically possible worlds are Everett worlds. Combining Individualism and Generality yields Alignment, a conjecture about the nature of possible worlds that is closely analogous to Lewisian modal realism. Like Lewisian modal realism, Alignment entails that each possible world is a real concrete individual of the same basic kind as the actual world. These similarities render EQM suitable for grounding a novel theory of the nature of metaphysical modality with some unique properties. Also like Lewisian modal realism, quantum modal realism is a reductive theory: it accounts for modality in fundamentally non-modal terms. But quantum modal realism also has unique epistemological advantages over Lewisian modal realism and other extant realist approaches to modality.
We examine the toy model of modal quantum theory (MQT), an analogue of actual quantum theory based on finite fields. In particular, we investigate how several essential ``no-go'' results (for cloning, deleting and hiding processes) work in MQT. Cloning and deleting are still forbidden in MQT, though the details of these results are somewhat different in the new context. However, the information of a modal qubit can be completely hidden in the correlations between two entangled modal qubits.