Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Science in figures

Specifics of quantum mechanics in physical knowledge

Gennady Vladimirovich Baranov

Published Mar 7, 2017• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

the article describes the specifics of quantum-mechanical knowledge, which is spoken by the criterion of mathematization of conditions of any quantum-mechanical material point, the specific quantum-mechanical sign of dualism of the description of an object. The achievements of quantum mechanics are estimated by results of antichaos essence of science.

DOI
10.21661/r-118246

Related papers

An Epistemological Basis for Quantum Physics

William Henry Werkmeister

Philosophy of science and, more specifically, philosophy of quantum physics can be but special fields of a general philosophy of knowledge; and the problems arising in these fields can be evaluated properly only when they are seen under the perspective of the whole range of human knowledge. This paper deals with problems of quantum physics and, in particular, with the problem of scientific objects in quantum physics from the epistemological point of view previously defined in the author's books, A Philosophy of Science (1940) and The Basis and Structure of Knowledge (1948). The argument of the paper, however, has not been stated before in the direct and concise manner here attempted and may therefore contain elements of novelty even for those readers who are familiar with the books just mentioned.

Philosophy of Science•Jan 1, 1950•3 citations

To Physical Foundation of Quantum Mechanics

V. E. Shemi-zadeh

On the base of years of experience of working on the problem of the physical foundation of quantum mechanics the author offers principles of solving it. Under certain pressure of mathematical formalism there has raised a hypothesis of complexity of space and time by Minkovsky, being significant mainly for quantum objects. In this eight-dimensional space and time with six space and two time dimensions all the problems and peculiarities of quantum mechanical formalism disappear, the reasons of their appearance become clear, and there comes a clear and physically transparent picture of the foundations of quantum mechanics.

arXiv:quant-ph/0206195•Jun 28, 2002•1 citation

The Emergent Dualism View of Quantum Physics and Consciousness

Christopher W. Tyler

In our description of nature the purpose is not to disclose the real essence of phenomena but only to track down as far as possible relations between the multifold aspects of our experience." -Niels Bohr (1934, p.18) "The conception of the objective reality of the elementary particles has evaporated not into the cloud of some new reality concept, but into the transparent clarity of a mathematics that represents no longer the behavior of the particles but our knowledge of this behavior." -Werner Heisenberg (1958, p. 95.) "In short, orthodox quantum mechanics is Cartesian dualistic at the pragmatic/operational level, but mentalistic on the ontological level." -Henry Stapp (2009, p. 8).

Cosmos and history•Oct 27, 2015•11 citations

«The Quantum Mechanics» in the Model of 4D Matter

Valery Skorobogatov

The quantum mechanics takes the significant place in the contemporary physics. It has many achievements in the development of our knowledge in the field of micro-world. There is the trial to penitence it on macro world [1]. With that in many ways such knowledge has the formal character that lowers the cognitive value of this theory that is so nus different as compared with the classical physics. Below the endeavor to give the alternative description of the notions of quantum mechanics is undertaken.

•Jan 1, 2013•0 citations

A few remarks on the interpretation of Niels Bohr's philosophy-physics in Karen Barad's agential realism

Andrei A. Paramonov

The article deals with the approach to understanding science and technology as well as natural and cultural practices developed by the American philosopher Karen Barad in the concept of agential realism. The peculiarity of her approach consists in referring as a starting point to quantum mechanics in its interpretation, which was proposed by Niels Bohr. Barad proposes a reinterpretation of Bohr's propositions through revealing their ontological content. In this regard, the article addresses the epistemological and ontological problems that quantum physics has faced, such as the conditions for the possibility of an objective description of the world, the nature of measurement, and the relationship between language and the material world. Discussed is the shift that Barad argues is asserted in Bohr's philosophy-physics, which consists of quantum mechanics moving from the linguistic concepts in which the world of classical science was represented to what Barad calls material-discursive practices through which the world is articulated and explained. The possibilities of a different interpretation of Niels Bohr's philosophy-physics are considered.

Vox Philosophical journal•Dec 30, 2023•0 citations

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN QUANTUM MECHANICS AND YOGĀCĀRA BUDDHISM ON PROPERTIES OF MATERIAL OBJECTS

Ven. Junyi Chen

With the development of quantum mechanics, the knowledge of properties of material objects has greatly changed from the common ideas found in classic physics. Since Yogācāra is considered to be one of most compatible Buddhist theories with modern science this article aims at comparing quantum mechanics and Yogācāra on properties of material objects from three aspects: the source of material objects; their substantiality; and the interference from the mind. By doing this, a conclusion is made that the two have the same opinions at a general level but different opinions, to certain extents, from each other at specifi c levels.

The Journal of International Buddhist Studies College•Aug 24, 2019•0 citations
the article describes the specifics of quantum-mechanical knowledge, which is spoken by the criterion of mathematization of conditions of any quantum-mechanical material point, the specific quantum-mechanical sign of dualism of the description of an object. The achievements of quantum mechanics are estimated by results of antichaos essence of science.
Philosophy of science and, more specifically, philosophy of quantum physics can be but special fields of a general philosophy of knowledge; and the problems arising in these fields can be evaluated properly only when they are seen under the perspective of the whole range of human knowledge. This paper deals with problems of quantum physics and, in particular, with the problem of scientific objects in quantum physics from the epistemological point of view previously defined in the author's books, A Philosophy of Science (1940) and The Basis and Structure of Knowledge (1948). The argument of the paper, however, has not been stated before in the direct and concise manner here attempted and may therefore contain elements of novelty even for those readers who are familiar with the books just mentioned.
On the base of years of experience of working on the problem of the physical foundation of quantum mechanics the author offers principles of solving it. Under certain pressure of mathematical formalism there has raised a hypothesis of complexity of space and time by Minkovsky, being significant mainly for quantum objects. In this eight-dimensional space and time with six space and two time dimensions all the problems and peculiarities of quantum mechanical formalism disappear, the reasons of their appearance become clear, and there comes a clear and physically transparent picture of the foundations of quantum mechanics.
In our description of nature the purpose is not to disclose the real essence of phenomena but only to track down as far as possible relations between the multifold aspects of our experience." -Niels Bohr (1934, p.18) "The conception of the objective reality of the elementary particles has evaporated not into the cloud of some new reality concept, but into the transparent clarity of a mathematics that represents no longer the behavior of the particles but our knowledge of this behavior." -Werner Heisenberg (1958, p. 95.) "In short, orthodox quantum mechanics is Cartesian dualistic at the pragmatic/operational level, but mentalistic on the ontological level." -Henry Stapp (2009, p. 8).
The quantum mechanics takes the significant place in the contemporary physics. It has many achievements in the development of our knowledge in the field of micro-world. There is the trial to penitence it on macro world [1]. With that in many ways such knowledge has the formal character that lowers the cognitive value of this theory that is so nus different as compared with the classical physics. Below the endeavor to give the alternative description of the notions of quantum mechanics is undertaken.
The article deals with the approach to understanding science and technology as well as natural and cultural practices developed by the American philosopher Karen Barad in the concept of agential realism. The peculiarity of her approach consists in referring as a starting point to quantum mechanics in its interpretation, which was proposed by Niels Bohr. Barad proposes a reinterpretation of Bohr's propositions through revealing their ontological content. In this regard, the article addresses the epistemological and ontological problems that quantum physics has faced, such as the conditions for the possibility of an objective description of the world, the nature of measurement, and the relationship between language and the material world. Discussed is the shift that Barad argues is asserted in Bohr's philosophy-physics, which consists of quantum mechanics moving from the linguistic concepts in which the world of classical science was represented to what Barad calls material-discursive practices through which the world is articulated and explained. The possibilities of a different interpretation of Niels Bohr's philosophy-physics are considered.
With the development of quantum mechanics, the knowledge of properties of material objects has greatly changed from the common ideas found in classic physics. Since Yogācāra is considered to be one of most compatible Buddhist theories with modern science this article aims at comparing quantum mechanics and Yogācāra on properties of material objects from three aspects: the source of material objects; their substantiality; and the interference from the mind. By doing this, a conclusion is made that the two have the same opinions at a general level but different opinions, to certain extents, from each other at specifi c levels.