Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Reinventing Akaike?s Wheel: model selection for quantum tomography.

Robin Blume-Kohout

Published Jun 1, 2015• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Lost in (Hilbert) Space - Model Selection for Quantum Tomography.

Travis L. Scholten, Robin Blume-Kohout

•Feb 1, 2015•0 citations

Quantum Clustering Algorithm using the Wheel of Tomography

Shradha Deshmukh, Preeti Mulay

International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology•May 25, 2022•2 citations

Applying Model Selection to Quantum State Tomography: Choosing Hilbert Space Dimension

Travis L. Scholten

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 5, 2015•0 citations

Automated Model Selection for Gate Set Tomography

Stefan Seritan, Kenneth Rudinger, Robin Blume-Kohout

APS March Meeting Abstracts•Mar 1, 2023•0 citations

On the edge: State tomography boundaries and model selection.

Travis L. Scholten

Model selection techniques currently used in quantum tomography may have problems.Such as loglikelihood ratio tests, or Akaike's AIC.This estimator outperforms the Wilks Theorem in predicting the Monte Carlo averages.It also performs reasonably well on an instanceby-instance basis.

•Nov 1, 2015•0 citations

Rank-based model selection for multiple ions quantum tomography

Mădălin Guţǎ, Theodore Kypraios, Ian L. Dryden

The statistical analysis of measurement data has become a key component of many quantum engineering experiments. As standard full state tomography becomes unfeasible for large dimensional quantum systems, one needs to exploit prior information and the 'sparsity' properties of the experimental state in order to reduce the dimensionality of the estimation problem. In this paper we propose model selection as a general principle for finding the simplest, or most parsimonious explanation of the data, by fitting different models and choosing the estimator with the best trade-off between likelihood fit and model complexity. We apply two well established model selection methods—the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC)—two models consisting of states of fixed rank and datasets such as are currently produced in multiple ions experiments. We test the performance of AIC and BIC on randomly chosen low rank states of four ions, and study the dependence of the selected rank with the number of measurement repetitions for one ion states. We then apply the methods to real data from a four ions experiment aimed at creating a Smolin state of rank 4. By applying the two methods together with the Pearson χ 2 test we conclude that the data can be suitably described with a model whose rank is between 7 and 9. Additionally we find that the mean square error of the maximum likelihood estimator for pure states is close to that of the optimal over all possible measurements.

arXiv:1206.4032•New Journal of Physics•Oct 1, 2012•38 citations
The statistical analysis of measurement data has become a key component of many quantum engineering experiments. As standard full state tomography becomes unfeasible for large dimensional quantum systems, one needs to exploit prior information and the 'sparsity' properties of the experimental state in order to reduce the dimensionality of the estimation problem. In this paper we propose model selection as a general principle for finding the simplest, or most parsimonious explanation of the data, by fitting different models and choosing the estimator with the best trade-off between likelihood fit and model complexity. We apply two well established model selection methods—the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC)—two models consisting of states of fixed rank and datasets such as are currently produced in multiple ions experiments. We test the performance of AIC and BIC on randomly chosen low rank states of four ions, and study the dependence of the selected rank with the number of measurement repetitions for one ion states. We then apply the methods to real data from a four ions experiment aimed at creating a Smolin state of rank 4. By applying the two methods together with the Pearson χ 2 test we conclude that the data can be suitably described with a model whose rank is between 7 and 9. Additionally we find that the mean square error of the maximum likelihood estimator for pure states is close to that of the optimal over all possible measurements.