Foundations of Physics

Response to Comment on ‘Non-representative Quantum Mechanical Weak Values’ by Ben-Israel and Vaidman

B. E. Y. Svensson

Published Jul 7, 2017• 5 citations

Publisher

DOI: 10.1007/s10701-017-0108-1

Related papers

Comment on “Non-representative Quantum Mechanical Weak Values”

Alon Ben-Israel, Lev Vaidman

Foundations of PhysicsFeb 15, 201711 citations

Non-representative Quantum Mechanical Weak Values

B. E. Y. Svensson

arXiv:1501.04469Foundations of PhysicsSep 19, 201515 citations

Reply to Ben-Israel and Vaidman, Comment on Non-representative Quantum Mechanical Weak values

B. E. Y. Svensson

Ben-Israel and Vaidman (arXiv:1608.07185) raise objections to my arguments that there are cases where a quantum mechanical weak value can be said not to represent the system to which it pertains. They are right in pointing out that some of my conclusions are too general. However, there are still cases where my conclusions withstand to their scrutiny.

arXiv:1609.08977Sep 28, 20161 citation

Comment on “Association between quantum paradoxes based on weak values and a realistic interpretation of quantum measurements”

Anonymous

Physical Review AMay 13, 20250 citations

Reply to "Comment on ‘Association between quantum paradoxes based on weak values and a realistic interpretation of quantum measurements’"

Anonymous

Physical Review AMay 12, 20250 citations

Comment on "Association between quantum paradoxes based on weak values and a realistic interpretation of quantum measurements"

Xabier Oianguren-Asua

Jan 1, 20250 citations