Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

A Short Note on Many World Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

俊一 松野

Published Nov 30, 2004• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Hugh Everett letter to Princeton University Press, 5-April-1980

Everett, Hugh

A short note from Hugh Everett III to Princeton University Press requesting 12 copies of the Graham-DeWitt anthology, The Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.

•Apr 5, 1980•0 citations

The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Princeton University Press eBooks•Mar 25, 2025•12 citations

Parallel Dialogues: What LLM Inference Can (and Cannot) Teach Us About the Many-Worlds Interpretation — A Companion Note

Earth Vitaly Shcherbak — Institution: Montenegro, San Francisco) Claude (Anthropic PBC

A companion note to "Evidence for the Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics via Large Language Model Architecture" (10.5281/zenodo.20533902). Revisits the structural analogy between parallel LLM inference and Everettian branching honestly: identifies what the analogy illustrates well (shared origin, isolated states, irreversible branch selection) and where it breaks down as physics — chiefly, the analogy is externally observable in a way that MWI branches, by construction, cannot be.

•Sep 15, 2026•0 citations

The Many-Universes Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Bryce Seligman DeWitt

Princeton University Press eBooks•Apr 24, 2015•140 citations

A remark on the interpretation of quantum mechanics

F. Ghaboussi

Physics Letters A•Oct 1, 1985•1 citation

The feasibility of many-worlds as the leading interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Martijn Hidding

This thesis takes a look at the many-worlds interpretation (MWI) and discusses if it can become the leading interpretation of quantum mechanics. Firstly the Copenhagen interpretation is outlined and its issues relating to the measurement problem are discussed while taking recent insights in decoherence theory into account. Establishing that wave-function collapse still yields interpretational issues, I discuss the ideas of Hugh Everett, who proposed the many-worlds interpretation, and David Wallace who is a prominent advocate of the MWI. In particular I discuss and review Wallace's arguments in favor of viewing the wave-function and the many worlds realistically. The next part shortly focuses on the testability of the many-worlds interpretation and the philosophical and theoretical issues relating to probability in the MWI. I end by concluding that the no-collapse interpretations are preferable to the Copenhagen interpretation, and I argue in favor of a realistic view towards all of the worlds. Furthermore, I conclude that standard textbooks on quantum mechanics should be updated to introduce students to the insight that wave-function collapse isn't needed in forming a complete theory of quantum mechanics.

•Aug 26, 2014•0 citations
A companion note to "Evidence for the Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics via Large Language Model Architecture" (10.5281/zenodo.20533902). Revisits the structural analogy between parallel LLM inference and Everettian branching honestly: identifies what the analogy illustrates well (shared origin, isolated states, irreversible branch selection) and where it breaks down as physics — chiefly, the analogy is externally observable in a way that MWI branches, by construction, cannot be.
This thesis takes a look at the many-worlds interpretation (MWI) and discusses if it can become the leading interpretation of quantum mechanics. Firstly the Copenhagen interpretation is outlined and its issues relating to the measurement problem are discussed while taking recent insights in decoherence theory into account. Establishing that wave-function collapse still yields interpretational issues, I discuss the ideas of Hugh Everett, who proposed the many-worlds interpretation, and David Wallace who is a prominent advocate of the MWI. In particular I discuss and review Wallace's arguments in favor of viewing the wave-function and the many worlds realistically. The next part shortly focuses on the testability of the many-worlds interpretation and the philosophical and theoretical issues relating to probability in the MWI. I end by concluding that the no-collapse interpretations are preferable to the Copenhagen interpretation, and I argue in favor of a realistic view towards all of the worlds. Furthermore, I conclude that standard textbooks on quantum mechanics should be updated to introduce students to the insight that wave-function collapse isn't needed in forming a complete theory of quantum mechanics.