Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

QUANTUM CORRELATIONS BEYOND BELL'S INEQUALITIES

Institutfiir Experimentalphysik

Published Jan 1, 1995• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

BELL INEQUALITIES AND CORRELATION EXPERIMENTS: A PURELY PARTICLE STATISTICAL INVESTIGATION

Marco Minozzo

Conference on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: Historical Analysis and Open Questions•May 1, 2000•3 citations

QUANTUM AND SUPER–QUANTUM CORRELATIONS

Gregg S. Jaeger

Beyond the Quantum•Sep 1, 2007•8 citations

Quantum Correlations beyond Bell’s Inequalities

Anton Zeilinger

NATO ASI series. Series B : Physics•Jan 1, 1995•2 citations

VIOLATION OF CLASSICAL INEQUALITIES AND EPR CORRELATIONS IN A TWO-MODE THREE-LEVEL ATOMIC SYSTEM

Eyob Alebachew Sete

We investigate violation of Cauchy–Schwarz and Bell inequalities in two-mode three-level cascade system with injected atomic coherence in the framework of quantum theory of multiwave mixing. We show that Cauchy–Schwarz inequality is strongly violated when there is strong entanglement in the system. It also appears that Bell inequality is violated in the region where there is weak entanglement and well-preserved where there is strong entanglement in the system. We thus note that there are states which are entangled but do not violate Bell inequality. We also show that this system can be used to prepare states that exhibit EPR correlations.

International Journal of Quantum Information•Aug 1, 2008•4 citations

EPR CORRELATIONS, BELL INEQUALITIES AND COMMON CAUSE SYSTEMS

Gábor Hofer‐Szabó

Standard common causal explanations of the EPR situation assume a so-called joint common cause system that is a common cause for all correlations. However, the assumption of a joint common cause system together with some other physically motivated assumptions concerning locality and no-conspiracy results in various Bell inequalities. Since Bell inequalities are violated for appropriate measurement settings, a local, non-conspiratorial joint common causal explanation of the EPR situation is ruled out. But why do we assume that a common causal explanation of a set of correlation consists in finding a joint common cause system for all correlations and not just in finding separate common cause systems for the different correlations? What are the \nperspectives of a local, non-conspiratorial separate common causal explanation for the EPR scenario? And finally, how do Bell inequalities relate to the weaker assumption of separate common cause systems? \n

•Mar 5, 2014•1 citation

Quantum Correlations and Bell's Inequality

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Sep 1, 2010•0 citations
We investigate violation of Cauchy–Schwarz and Bell inequalities in two-mode three-level cascade system with injected atomic coherence in the framework of quantum theory of multiwave mixing. We show that Cauchy–Schwarz inequality is strongly violated when there is strong entanglement in the system. It also appears that Bell inequality is violated in the region where there is weak entanglement and well-preserved where there is strong entanglement in the system. We thus note that there are states which are entangled but do not violate Bell inequality. We also show that this system can be used to prepare states that exhibit EPR correlations.
Standard common causal explanations of the EPR situation assume a so-called joint common cause system that is a common cause for all correlations. However, the assumption of a joint common cause system together with some other physically motivated assumptions concerning locality and no-conspiracy results in various Bell inequalities. Since Bell inequalities are violated for appropriate measurement settings, a local, non-conspiratorial joint common causal explanation of the EPR situation is ruled out. But why do we assume that a common causal explanation of a set of correlation consists in finding a joint common cause system for all correlations and not just in finding separate common cause systems for the different correlations? What are the \nperspectives of a local, non-conspiratorial separate common causal explanation for the EPR scenario? And finally, how do Bell inequalities relate to the weaker assumption of separate common cause systems? \n