Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

European studies in philosophy of science

Small Probability Space Formulation of Bell’s Theorem

Márton Gömöri, Tomasz Placek

Published Jan 1, 2017• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-55486-0_6

Related papers

Bell’s Theorem Refuted via Elementary Probability Theory

Gordon Watson

•Oct 1, 2020•0 citations

Bell’s Theorem, Bell Inequalities, and the “Probability Normalization Loophole”

John F. Clauser

The frontiers collection•Nov 15, 2016•6 citations

Conditionals, Probability and Bell’s Theorem

Henry Krips

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1989•1 citation

Bell's Theorem -- Early formulation and experimental tests:

John F. Clauser

•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations

An extended phase space for Quantum Mechanics

Lopez, C.

The standard formulation of Quantum Mechanics violates locality of interactions and the action reaction principle. An alternative formulation in an extended phase space could preserve both principles, but Bell's theorems show that a distribution of probability in a space of local variables can not reproduce the quantum correlations. An extended phase space is defined in an alternative formulation of Quantum Mechanics. Quantum states are represented by a complex va\-lued distribution of amplitude, so that Bell's theorems do not apply.

arXiv:1509.07025•Sep 23, 2015•3 citations

Contra Bellum: Bell's Theorem as a Confusion of Languages

Marek Czachor

Bell's theorem is a conflict of mathematical predictions formulated within an infinite hierarchy of mathematical models. Inequalities formulated at level k ∈ Z are violated by probabilities at level k+1. We are inclined to think that k=0 corresponds to the classical world, while k=1 — to the quantum one. However, as the k=0 inequalities are violated by k=1 probabilities, the same relation holds between k=1 inequalities violated by k=2 probabilities, k=-1 inequalities violated by k=0 probabilities, and so forth. By accepting the logic of the Bell theorem, can we prove by induction that nothing exists?

arXiv:2301.10727•Acta Physica Polonica A•Jun 1, 2023•4 citations
The standard formulation of Quantum Mechanics violates locality of interactions and the action reaction principle. An alternative formulation in an extended phase space could preserve both principles, but Bell's theorems show that a distribution of probability in a space of local variables can not reproduce the quantum correlations. An extended phase space is defined in an alternative formulation of Quantum Mechanics. Quantum states are represented by a complex va\-lued distribution of amplitude, so that Bell's theorems do not apply.
Bell's theorem is a conflict of mathematical predictions formulated within an infinite hierarchy of mathematical models. Inequalities formulated at level k ∈ Z are violated by probabilities at level k+1. We are inclined to think that k=0 corresponds to the classical world, while k=1 — to the quantum one. However, as the k=0 inequalities are violated by k=1 probabilities, the same relation holds between k=1 inequalities violated by k=2 probabilities, k=-1 inequalities violated by k=0 probabilities, and so forth. By accepting the logic of the Bell theorem, can we prove by induction that nothing exists?