Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Low density parity check lattices based on construction D' and cycle-free Tanner graphs.

Mohammad‐Reza Sadeghi, Daniel Panario

Published Jan 1, 2003• 9 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Low density parity check lattices based on construction 𝐷′ and cycle-free Tanner graphs

Mohammad Ali Sadeghi, Daniel Panario

DIMACS series in discrete mathematics and theoretical computer science•Jul 19, 2005•3 citations

Construction of Cycle-free LDPC Codes

Fengfan Yang

The linear block code is called a binary Low-Density Parity-Check code if whose parity-check matrix is a sparse matrix. For the features of parity-check matrix, a LDPC code can be illustrated by a Tanner graph. Cycles, especially short cycles in the Tanner graph, lead to inefficient decoding and prevent the decoding algorithm from converging to the optimal decoding result. In this paper, a simple algorithm of constructing four-cycle-free regular A(n,d_v,d_c)LDPC codes, d_v3, is introduced. And we analyse the relationship between the performance and the cycle.

Journal of Yunnan University for Nationalites•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations

Low density parity check lattices

Mohammad-Reza Rafsanjani-Sadeghi

•Jan 1, 2004•5 citations

Pseudocodeword-Free Criterion for Codes with Cycle-Free Tanner Graph

Wittawat Kositwattanarerk

Iterative decoding and linear programming decoding are guaranteed to converge to the maximum-likelihood codeword when the underlying Tanner graph is cycle-free. Therefore, cycles are usually seen as the culprit of low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes. In this paper, we argue in the context of graph cover pseudocodeword that, for a code that permits a cycle-free Tanner graph, cycles have no effect on error performance as long as they are a part of redundant rows. Specifically, we characterize all parity-check matrices that are pseudocodeword-free for such class of codes.

arXiv:1706.06648•Jun 20, 2017•0 citations

A construction of low-density parity-check codes

李铁楠, 单秀玲

•Jan 1, 2013•2 citations

On construction of low density parity check codes

Bahram Honary, Shu Lin, E.M. Gabidulin +4 more

•Jun 2, 2004•23 citations
The linear block code is called a binary Low-Density Parity-Check code if whose parity-check matrix is a sparse matrix. For the features of parity-check matrix, a LDPC code can be illustrated by a Tanner graph. Cycles, especially short cycles in the Tanner graph, lead to inefficient decoding and prevent the decoding algorithm from converging to the optimal decoding result. In this paper, a simple algorithm of constructing four-cycle-free regular A(n,d_v,d_c)LDPC codes, d_v3, is introduced. And we analyse the relationship between the performance and the cycle.
Iterative decoding and linear programming decoding are guaranteed to converge to the maximum-likelihood codeword when the underlying Tanner graph is cycle-free. Therefore, cycles are usually seen as the culprit of low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes. In this paper, we argue in the context of graph cover pseudocodeword that, for a code that permits a cycle-free Tanner graph, cycles have no effect on error performance as long as they are a part of redundant rows. Specifically, we characterize all parity-check matrices that are pseudocodeword-free for such class of codes.