Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics World

Mystery of quantum measurement

N. G. van Kampen

Published Dec 1, 1991• 7 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Following Kurt Gottfried's response (October 1991, p34) to John Bell, perhaps I, as another author attacked by Bell, might summarise my position, having corrected some misrepresentations by Bell previously (October 1990, Letters p20).
DOI
10.1088/2058-7058/4/12/18

Related papers

Recollections of John Bell

Michael Nauenberg

It is a pleasure to contribute to this anthology some of my recollections of John Bell. I first met him at SLAC, where we were visitors during 1964–5 when he was on leave from CERN, and I was on leave from the Columbia University Physics Department. Soon I found that we had a common interest in the foundations of quantum mechanics, and we had lively discussions on this subject. We were concerned with the “reduction of the wave packet” after an experiment in quantum mechanics was completed, and wrote a tongue-incheek article on this subject for a festschrift in honor of Viki Weisskopf [1], stating that We emphasize not only that our view is that of a minority but also that current interest in such questions is small. The typical physicist feels that they have long been answered, and that he will fully understand just how, if ever he can spare twenty minutes to think about it. Now, 50 years later, this topic, known as the measurement problem , has become the source of numerous articles representing many different viewpoints. At the time, however, I confess that I did not realize that the main flaw in John von Neumann's presentation of this problem was his assumption that a measuring device can be represented by a pointer with only two quantum states. Actually, a measuring device must be able to record the outcome of an experiment, and for this purpose it has to have an enormous number of quantum states, leading to an irreversible macroscopic transition in the device. A correct discussion of the measurement problemwas given, for example, by Nico vanKampen [2], but recently he told me that he was unable to persuade Bell, who continued to be concerned about this problem for the rest of his life. Indeed, shortly before he died, he wrote a diatribe [3] entitled “Against Measurement,” where he continued to argue that this problem constituted a fundamental flaw in quantum mechanics. Kurt Gottfried, who referred to this problem as Bell's second major theme, called his article “a fervent jeremiad summarizing a lifetime of reflection on what he saw as the fatal flaws of the orthodox theory” [4].

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Aug 31, 2016•1 citation

Comments on ‘‘When is a quantum measurement?’’ [Am. J. Phys. 5 4, 688 (1986)]

Peter John Bussey

American Journal of Physics•Jun 1, 1988•0 citations

Comments Concerning “A New Look at the Quantum Mechanical Problem of Measurement”

William Band, James L Park

American Journal of Physics•Aug 1, 1973•0 citations

Quantum Mechanics, High Energy Physics and Accelerators: Selected Papers of John S Bell (With Commentary)

Mary Bell, Kurt Gottfried, Martinus J. G. Veltman

The scientific career of John Stewart Bell was distinguished by its breadth and its quality. He made several very important contributions to scientific fields as diverse as accelerator physics, high energy physics and the foundations of quantum mechanics. This book contains a large part of J S Bell's publications, including those that are recognized as his most important achievements, as well as others that are for no good reason less well known. The selection was made by Mary Bell, Martinus Veltman and Kurt Gottfried, all of whom were involved with John Bell both personally and professionally throughout a large part of his life. An introductory chapter has been written to help place the selected papers in a historical context and to review their significance. This book comprises an impressive collection of outstanding scientific work of one of the greatest scientists of the recent past, and it will remain important and influential for a long time to come.

World Scientific series in 20th century physics•Sep 1, 1995•17 citations

Comments on a recent paper concerning the quantum theory of measurement

A. Loinger

Nuclear Physics A•Feb 1, 1968•30 citations

Clear as a Bell

David Bailin

According to my diary, the speaker at the Theoretical Physics seminar on Thursday, 6 October 1966 at the University of Sussex was ‘John Bell (CERN)’. As was my habit with speakers I knew, I did not...

Contemporary Physics•Oct 10, 2017•0 citations
It is a pleasure to contribute to this anthology some of my recollections of John Bell. I first met him at SLAC, where we were visitors during 1964–5 when he was on leave from CERN, and I was on leave from the Columbia University Physics Department. Soon I found that we had a common interest in the foundations of quantum mechanics, and we had lively discussions on this subject. We were concerned with the “reduction of the wave packet” after an experiment in quantum mechanics was completed, and wrote a tongue-incheek article on this subject for a festschrift in honor of Viki Weisskopf [1], stating that We emphasize not only that our view is that of a minority but also that current interest in such questions is small. The typical physicist feels that they have long been answered, and that he will fully understand just how, if ever he can spare twenty minutes to think about it. Now, 50 years later, this topic, known as the measurement problem , has become the source of numerous articles representing many different viewpoints. At the time, however, I confess that I did not realize that the main flaw in John von Neumann's presentation of this problem was his assumption that a measuring device can be represented by a pointer with only two quantum states. Actually, a measuring device must be able to record the outcome of an experiment, and for this purpose it has to have an enormous number of quantum states, leading to an irreversible macroscopic transition in the device. A correct discussion of the measurement problemwas given, for example, by Nico vanKampen [2], but recently he told me that he was unable to persuade Bell, who continued to be concerned about this problem for the rest of his life. Indeed, shortly before he died, he wrote a diatribe [3] entitled “Against Measurement,” where he continued to argue that this problem constituted a fundamental flaw in quantum mechanics. Kurt Gottfried, who referred to this problem as Bell's second major theme, called his article “a fervent jeremiad summarizing a lifetime of reflection on what he saw as the fatal flaws of the orthodox theory” [4].
The scientific career of John Stewart Bell was distinguished by its breadth and its quality. He made several very important contributions to scientific fields as diverse as accelerator physics, high energy physics and the foundations of quantum mechanics. This book contains a large part of J S Bell's publications, including those that are recognized as his most important achievements, as well as others that are for no good reason less well known. The selection was made by Mary Bell, Martinus Veltman and Kurt Gottfried, all of whom were involved with John Bell both personally and professionally throughout a large part of his life. An introductory chapter has been written to help place the selected papers in a historical context and to review their significance. This book comprises an impressive collection of outstanding scientific work of one of the greatest scientists of the recent past, and it will remain important and influential for a long time to come.