Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

ВЕСТНИК Брянского государственного университета

О физическом содержании и формулировках квантовой механики

Г В Егоров

Published Jan 1, 2015• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

The paper analyzes the physical content and different formulations of quantum mechanics, a comparison of different formulations marked features of different approaches to the construction of quantum theory, argues the possibility of applying the principle of plurality and unity in the process models of presentation of the topic in a physics course.

Related papers

ОТЛИЧИЯ КЛАССИЧЕСКОЙ И КВАНТОВОЙ МЕХАНИКИ

Айғаным Мұратқызы Сейітова, Қымбат Ермекқызы Бектемір

This article analyzes the fundamental differences between classical and quantum mechanics from a scientific and theoretical perspective. By comparing the historical development of two physical paradigms, their mathematical frameworks, laws, and areas of application, the study explores their role in explaining natural phenomena. Classical mechanics is based on causal determinism, continuity, and the precise trajectory of motion, whereas quantum mechanics employs concepts of probability, discreteness, and the wave function. To highlight the differences between the theories, key physical laws such as Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, the Schrödinger equation, and Newton’s laws are compared. The article also discusses the modern interpretation of mechanics in the era of quantum technologies.

«Qazaq Journal of Young Scientist» халықаралық ғылыми журналы•Dec 9, 2025•0 citations

Lectures on the Mathematics of Quantum Mechanics I

Gianfausto Dell’Antonio

The first volume (General Theory) differs from most textbooks as it emphasizes the mathematical structure and mathematical rigor, while being adapted to the teaching the first semester of an advanced course in Quantum Mechanics (the content of the book are the lectures of courses actually delivered.). It differs also from the very few texts in Quantum Mechanics that give emphasis to the mathematical aspects because this book, being written as Lecture Notes, has the structure of lectures delivered in a course, namely introduction of the problem, outline of the relevant points, mathematical tools needed, theorems, proofs. This makes this book particularly useful for self-study and for instructors in the preparation of a second course in Quantum Mechanics (after a first basic course). With some minor additions it can be used also as a basis of a first course in Quantum Mechanics for students in mathematics curricula. The second part (Selected Topics) are lecture notes of a more advanced course aimed at giving the basic notions necessary to do research in several areas of mathematical physics connected with quantum mechanics, from solid state to singular interactions, many body theory, semi-classical analysis, quantum statistical mechanics. The structure of this book is suitable for a second-semester course, in which the lectures are meant to provide, in addition to theorems and proofs, an overview of a more specific subject and hints to the direction of research. In this respect and for the width of subjects this second volume differs from other monographs on Quantum Mechanics. The second volume can be useful for students who want to have a basic preparation for doing research and for instructors who may want to use it as a basis for the presentation of selected topics.

Atlantis studies in mathematical physics•Jan 1, 2015•10 citations

Quantum Mechanics

Bas C. van Fraassen

The author argues that quantum theory admits a plurality of interpretations, each aiding further understanding of the theory, but also advocating specifically the Copenhagen Variant of the Modal Interpretation. That variant is applied to topics like the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox and the problem of 'identical' particles.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Sep 26, 1991•464 citations

Lectures on Quantum Mechanics for Mathematics Students

L. D. Faddeev, O. Yakubovskiĭ

This book is based on notes from the course developed and taught for more than 30 years at the Department of Mathematics of Leningrad University. The goal of the course was to present the basics of quantum mechanics and its mathematical content to students in mathematics. This book differs from the majority of other textbooks on the subject in that much more attention is paid to general principles of quantum mechanics. In particular, the authors describe in detail the relation between classical and quantum mechanics. When selecting particular topics, the authors emphasize those that are related to interesting mathematical theories. In particular, the book contains a discussion of problems related to group representation theory and to scattering theory. This book is rather elementary and concise, and it does not require prerequisites beyond the standard undergraduate mathematical curriculum. It is aimed at giving a mathematically oriented student the opportunity to grasp the main points of quantum theory in a mathematical framework.

Student mathematical library•Mar 9, 2009•54 citations

Многомировая интерпретация квантовой механики и множество миров Н. Гудмена

Svetlana Vlasova

Different conceptions on reality in physics and philosophy in the 20th century have been analyzed in the article. These approaches caused the necessity to study the multitude of the worlds. The author proved that multiworld interpretation of quantum mechanics and multitude of the worlds in the Goodman’s conception are opposite tendencies. Everett and his followers consider the quantum world as some universal reality whereas Goodman and his supporters do not believe in universal reality.

Российский гуманитарный журнал•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations

Dirac Book The Principles Of Quantum Mechanics as presenting the alternative organization of a theory

Antonino Drago

Authoritative appraisals qualified this book as an axiomatic theory. However, being its essential content no more than an analogy, its theoretical organization cannot be an axiomatic one. In fact, in the first edition Dirac declares to avoid an axiomatic presentation. Moreover, I show that the text is aimed at solving a basic problem: How quantum mechanics is similar to classical mechanics. A previous paper analyzed all past theories of physics, chemistry and mathematics, presented by the respective authors in a non-axiomatic way. Four characteristic features of a new model of organizing a theory have been recognized. An accurate inspection of Dirac text proves that it actually applied this kind of organization of a theory. This fact gives a formal reason of what Kronz and Lupher suggested through intuitive categories, pragmatism and rigor, i.e. Dirac formulation of Quantum mechanics represents a distinct theoretical attitude from von Neumann axiomatic attitude. However, since the second edition Dirac changed his attitude; although relying again on an analogy, his theory was referred to the axiomatic method. Some considerations on the odd paths which led to the present formulation of QM are added. They suggest to look for a new foundation of this theory.

arXiv:2101.09565•Jan 23, 2021•0 citations
The paper analyzes the physical content and different formulations of quantum mechanics, a comparison of different formulations marked features of different approaches to the construction of quantum theory, argues the possibility of applying the principle of plurality and unity in the process models of presentation of the topic in a physics course.
This article analyzes the fundamental differences between classical and quantum mechanics from a scientific and theoretical perspective. By comparing the historical development of two physical paradigms, their mathematical frameworks, laws, and areas of application, the study explores their role in explaining natural phenomena. Classical mechanics is based on causal determinism, continuity, and the precise trajectory of motion, whereas quantum mechanics employs concepts of probability, discreteness, and the wave function. To highlight the differences between the theories, key physical laws such as Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, the Schrödinger equation, and Newton’s laws are compared. The article also discusses the modern interpretation of mechanics in the era of quantum technologies.
The first volume (General Theory) differs from most textbooks as it emphasizes the mathematical structure and mathematical rigor, while being adapted to the teaching the first semester of an advanced course in Quantum Mechanics (the content of the book are the lectures of courses actually delivered.). It differs also from the very few texts in Quantum Mechanics that give emphasis to the mathematical aspects because this book, being written as Lecture Notes, has the structure of lectures delivered in a course, namely introduction of the problem, outline of the relevant points, mathematical tools needed, theorems, proofs. This makes this book particularly useful for self-study and for instructors in the preparation of a second course in Quantum Mechanics (after a first basic course). With some minor additions it can be used also as a basis of a first course in Quantum Mechanics for students in mathematics curricula. The second part (Selected Topics) are lecture notes of a more advanced course aimed at giving the basic notions necessary to do research in several areas of mathematical physics connected with quantum mechanics, from solid state to singular interactions, many body theory, semi-classical analysis, quantum statistical mechanics. The structure of this book is suitable for a second-semester course, in which the lectures are meant to provide, in addition to theorems and proofs, an overview of a more specific subject and hints to the direction of research. In this respect and for the width of subjects this second volume differs from other monographs on Quantum Mechanics. The second volume can be useful for students who want to have a basic preparation for doing research and for instructors who may want to use it as a basis for the presentation of selected topics.
This book is based on notes from the course developed and taught for more than 30 years at the Department of Mathematics of Leningrad University. The goal of the course was to present the basics of quantum mechanics and its mathematical content to students in mathematics. This book differs from the majority of other textbooks on the subject in that much more attention is paid to general principles of quantum mechanics. In particular, the authors describe in detail the relation between classical and quantum mechanics. When selecting particular topics, the authors emphasize those that are related to interesting mathematical theories. In particular, the book contains a discussion of problems related to group representation theory and to scattering theory. This book is rather elementary and concise, and it does not require prerequisites beyond the standard undergraduate mathematical curriculum. It is aimed at giving a mathematically oriented student the opportunity to grasp the main points of quantum theory in a mathematical framework.
Authoritative appraisals qualified this book as an axiomatic theory. However, being its essential content no more than an analogy, its theoretical organization cannot be an axiomatic one. In fact, in the first edition Dirac declares to avoid an axiomatic presentation. Moreover, I show that the text is aimed at solving a basic problem: How quantum mechanics is similar to classical mechanics. A previous paper analyzed all past theories of physics, chemistry and mathematics, presented by the respective authors in a non-axiomatic way. Four characteristic features of a new model of organizing a theory have been recognized. An accurate inspection of Dirac text proves that it actually applied this kind of organization of a theory. This fact gives a formal reason of what Kronz and Lupher suggested through intuitive categories, pragmatism and rigor, i.e. Dirac formulation of Quantum mechanics represents a distinct theoretical attitude from von Neumann axiomatic attitude. However, since the second edition Dirac changed his attitude; although relying again on an analogy, his theory was referred to the axiomatic method. Some considerations on the odd paths which led to the present formulation of QM are added. They suggest to look for a new foundation of this theory.