Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing, Data, and Analytics

A study of complex deep learning networks on high performance, neuromorphic, and quantum computers

Thomas E. Potok, Catherine D. Schuman, Steven R. Young, Robert M. Patton, Federico M. Spedalieri, Jeremy Liu, Ke-Thia Yao, Garrett S. Rose, Gangotree Chakma

Published Nov 13, 2016• 15 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Current Deep Learning models use highly optimized convolutional neural networks (CNN) trained on large graphical processing units (GPU)-based computers with a fairly simple layered network topology, i.e., highly connected layers, without intra-layer connections. Complex topologies have been proposed, but are intractable to train on current systems. Building the topologies of the deep learning network requires hand tuning, and implementing the network in hardware is expensive in both cost and power.In this paper, we evaluate deep learning models using three different computing architectures to address these problems: quantum computing to train complex topologies, high performance computing (HPC) to automatically determine network topology, and neuromorphic computing for a low-power hardware implementation. Due to input size limitations of current quantum computers we use the MNIST dataset for our evaluation.The results show the possibility of using the three architectures in tandem to explore complex deep learning networks that are untrainable using a von Neumann architecture. We show that a quantum computer can find high quality values of intra-layer connections and weights, while yielding a tractable time result as the complexity of the network increases; a high performance computer can find optimal layer-based topologies; and a neuromorphic computer can represent the complex topology and weights derived from the other architectures in low power memristive hardware.This represents a new capability that is not feasible with current von Neumann architecture. It potentially enables the ability to solve very complicated problems unsolvable with current computing technologies.

DOI
10.5555/3018874.3018880

Related papers

A Study of Complex Deep Learning Networks on High Performance, Neuromorphic, and Quantum Computers

Thomas E. Potok, Catherine D. Schuman, Steven R. Young +6 more

Current Deep Learning models use highly optimized convolutional neural networks (CNN) trained on large graphical processing units (GPU)-based computers with a fairly simple layered network topology, i.e., highly connected layers, without intra-layer connections. Complex topologies have been proposed, but are intractable to train on current systems. Building the topologies of the deep learning network requires hand tuning, and implementing the network in hardware is expensive in both cost and power.In this paper, we evaluate deep learning models using three different computing architectures to address these problems: quantum computing to train complex topologies, high performance computing (HPC) to automatically determine network topology, and neuromorphic computing for a low-power hardware implementation. Due to input size limitations of current quantum computers we use the MNIST dataset for our evaluation.The results show the possibility of using the three architectures in tandem to explore complex deep learning networks that are untrainable using a von Neumann architecture. We show that a quantum computer can find high quality values of intra-layer connections and weights, while yielding a tractable time result as the complexity of the network increases; a high performance computer can find optimal layer-based topologies; and a neuromorphic computer can represent the complex topology and weights derived from the other architectures in low power memristive hardware.This represents a new capability that is not feasible with current von Neumann architecture. It potentially enables the ability to solve very complicated problems unsolvable with current computing technologies.

•Nov 1, 2016•15 citations

A Study of Complex Deep Learning Networks on High Performance, Neuromorphic, and Quantum Computers

Thomas E. Potok, Catherine D. Schuman, Steven R. Young +6 more

Current Deep Learning approaches have been very successful using convolutional neural networks (CNN) trained on large graphical processing units (GPU)-based computers. Three limitations of this approach are: 1) they are based on a simple layered network topology, i.e., highly connected layers, without intra-layer connections; 2) the networks are manually configured to achieve optimal results, and 3) the implementation of neuron model is expensive in both cost and power. In this paper, we evaluate deep learning models using three different computing architectures to address these problems: quantum computing to train complex topologies, high performance computing (HPC) to automatically determine network topology, and neuromorphic computing for a low-power hardware implementation. We use the MNIST dataset for our experiment, due to input size limitations of current quantum computers. Our results show the feasibility of using the three architectures in tandem to address the above deep learning limitations. We show a quantum computer can find high quality values of intra-layer connections weights, in a tractable time as the complexity of the network increases; a high performance computer can find optimal layer-based topologies; and a neuromorphic computer can represent the complex topology and weights derived from the other architectures in low power memristive hardware.

arXiv:1703.05364•Mar 15, 2017•1 citation

A Study of Complex Deep Learning Networks on High-Performance, Neuromorphic, and Quantum Computers

Thomas E. Potok, Catherine D. Schuman, Steven R. Young +6 more

Current deep learning approaches have been very successful using convolutional neural networks trained on large graphical-processing-unit-based computers. Three limitations of this approach are that (1) they are based on a simple layered network topology, i.e., highly connected layers, without intra-layer connections; (2) the networks are manually configured to achieve optimal results, and (3) the implementation of the network model is expensive in both cost and power. In this article, we evaluate deep learning models using three different computing architectures to address these problems: quantum computing to train complex topologies, high performance computing to automatically determine network topology, and neuromorphic computing for a low-power hardware implementation. We use the MNIST dataset for our experiment, due to input size limitations of current quantum computers. Our results show the feasibility of using the three architectures in tandem to address the above deep learning limitations. We show that a quantum computer can find high quality values of intra-layer connection weights in a tractable time as the complexity of the network increases, a high performance computer can find optimal layer-based topologies, and a neuromorphic computer can represent the complex topology and weights derived from the other architectures in low power memristive hardware.

ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems•Apr 30, 2018•78 citations

Adiabatic Quantum Computation Applied to Deep Learning Networks

Jeremy Liu, Federico M. Spedalieri, Ke-Thia Yao +6 more

Training deep learning networks is a difficult task due to computational complexity, and this is traditionally handled by simplifying network topology to enable parallel computation on graphical processing units (GPUs). However, the emergence of quantum devices allows reconsideration of complex topologies. We illustrate a particular network topology that can be trained to classify MNIST data (an image dataset of handwritten digits) and neutrino detection data using a restricted form of adiabatic quantum computation known as quantum annealing performed by a D-Wave processor. We provide a brief description of the hardware and how it solves Ising models, how we translate our data into the corresponding Ising models, and how we use available expanded topology options to explore potential performance improvements. Although we focus on the application of quantum annealing in this article, the work discussed here is just one of three approaches we explored as part of a larger project that considers alternative means for training deep learning networks. The other approaches involve using a high performance computing (HPC) environment to automatically find network topologies with good performance and using neuromorphic computing to find a low-power solution for training deep learning networks. Our results show that our quantum approach can find good network parameters in a reasonable time despite increased network topology complexity; that HPC can find good parameters for traditional, simplified network topologies; and that neuromorphic computers can use low power memristive hardware to represent complex topologies and parameters derived from other architecture choices.

Entropy•May 18, 2018•36 citations

Quantum spiking neural networks for image classification

Shilong Liu, Yongjian Gu

As the field of artificial intelligence experiences the emergence of various large-scale models, the computing power requirements are increasing. Simultaneously, Moore’s Law is approaching its limits, which intensifies the need to address how to perform high-dimensional complex data computations efficiently and with minimal energy consumption. Quantum computing and neuromorphic computing, with their unique features, offer potential solutions to this contemporary challenge. In this study, we aim to integrate quantum computing with neuromorphic computing, and develop a quantum spiking neural networks architecture. We proposed three measurement strategy to reducing operational costs, making it more friendly to near-term quantum hardware. We evaluated the performance of these three models on the standard MNIST dataset for classification tasks and found that they maintained a high level of accuracy despite a reduced number of parameters and a substantial decrease in the number of quantum circuit shots.

International Conference on Algorithms, Network, and Communication Technology (ICANCT)•Mar 3, 2025•1 citation

Evaluate Hybrid Classical-Quantum Architecture in Deep Image Processing

Shyama Heshini Niranjala, M. Kazem Chamran, Mustafa Muwafak Alobaedy

This research focuses on the architectural design and the performance difference of hybrid quantum and classical machine learning in the context of image processing using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). As we are in the digital era, it's crucial to deal with complex datasets due to the scalability and performance issues. In this research, researchers experienced the use of classical CNNs integration with the quantum computing paradigms. Based on the research findings, we outline the architecture of such hybrid models, highlighting the integration of standard CNN layers with Variational Quantum Circuits (VQCs) and the prominence of the ReLU activation function. The study investigates comparative performance metrics and observations using standard CNNs and adding extra layers in contrast to those of quantum CNNs run on classical hardware, highlighting such metrics as accuracy and computational performance. The findings highlight the feasibility and comparative advantage of hybrid models, suggesting the prospects of improved sophisticated deep image processing methods.

IEEE International Conference on System Engineering and Technology (ICSET)•Oct 4, 2025•1 citation
Current Deep Learning models use highly optimized convolutional neural networks (CNN) trained on large graphical processing units (GPU)-based computers with a fairly simple layered network topology, i.e., highly connected layers, without intra-layer connections. Complex topologies have been proposed, but are intractable to train on current systems. Building the topologies of the deep learning network requires hand tuning, and implementing the network in hardware is expensive in both cost and power.In this paper, we evaluate deep learning models using three different computing architectures to address these problems: quantum computing to train complex topologies, high performance computing (HPC) to automatically determine network topology, and neuromorphic computing for a low-power hardware implementation. Due to input size limitations of current quantum computers we use the MNIST dataset for our evaluation.The results show the possibility of using the three architectures in tandem to explore complex deep learning networks that are untrainable using a von Neumann architecture. We show that a quantum computer can find high quality values of intra-layer connections and weights, while yielding a tractable time result as the complexity of the network increases; a high performance computer can find optimal layer-based topologies; and a neuromorphic computer can represent the complex topology and weights derived from the other architectures in low power memristive hardware.This represents a new capability that is not feasible with current von Neumann architecture. It potentially enables the ability to solve very complicated problems unsolvable with current computing technologies.
Current Deep Learning models use highly optimized convolutional neural networks (CNN) trained on large graphical processing units (GPU)-based computers with a fairly simple layered network topology, i.e., highly connected layers, without intra-layer connections. Complex topologies have been proposed, but are intractable to train on current systems. Building the topologies of the deep learning network requires hand tuning, and implementing the network in hardware is expensive in both cost and power.In this paper, we evaluate deep learning models using three different computing architectures to address these problems: quantum computing to train complex topologies, high performance computing (HPC) to automatically determine network topology, and neuromorphic computing for a low-power hardware implementation. Due to input size limitations of current quantum computers we use the MNIST dataset for our evaluation.The results show the possibility of using the three architectures in tandem to explore complex deep learning networks that are untrainable using a von Neumann architecture. We show that a quantum computer can find high quality values of intra-layer connections and weights, while yielding a tractable time result as the complexity of the network increases; a high performance computer can find optimal layer-based topologies; and a neuromorphic computer can represent the complex topology and weights derived from the other architectures in low power memristive hardware.This represents a new capability that is not feasible with current von Neumann architecture. It potentially enables the ability to solve very complicated problems unsolvable with current computing technologies.
Current Deep Learning approaches have been very successful using convolutional neural networks (CNN) trained on large graphical processing units (GPU)-based computers. Three limitations of this approach are: 1) they are based on a simple layered network topology, i.e., highly connected layers, without intra-layer connections; 2) the networks are manually configured to achieve optimal results, and 3) the implementation of neuron model is expensive in both cost and power. In this paper, we evaluate deep learning models using three different computing architectures to address these problems: quantum computing to train complex topologies, high performance computing (HPC) to automatically determine network topology, and neuromorphic computing for a low-power hardware implementation. We use the MNIST dataset for our experiment, due to input size limitations of current quantum computers. Our results show the feasibility of using the three architectures in tandem to address the above deep learning limitations. We show a quantum computer can find high quality values of intra-layer connections weights, in a tractable time as the complexity of the network increases; a high performance computer can find optimal layer-based topologies; and a neuromorphic computer can represent the complex topology and weights derived from the other architectures in low power memristive hardware.
Current deep learning approaches have been very successful using convolutional neural networks trained on large graphical-processing-unit-based computers. Three limitations of this approach are that (1) they are based on a simple layered network topology, i.e., highly connected layers, without intra-layer connections; (2) the networks are manually configured to achieve optimal results, and (3) the implementation of the network model is expensive in both cost and power. In this article, we evaluate deep learning models using three different computing architectures to address these problems: quantum computing to train complex topologies, high performance computing to automatically determine network topology, and neuromorphic computing for a low-power hardware implementation. We use the MNIST dataset for our experiment, due to input size limitations of current quantum computers. Our results show the feasibility of using the three architectures in tandem to address the above deep learning limitations. We show that a quantum computer can find high quality values of intra-layer connection weights in a tractable time as the complexity of the network increases, a high performance computer can find optimal layer-based topologies, and a neuromorphic computer can represent the complex topology and weights derived from the other architectures in low power memristive hardware.
Training deep learning networks is a difficult task due to computational complexity, and this is traditionally handled by simplifying network topology to enable parallel computation on graphical processing units (GPUs). However, the emergence of quantum devices allows reconsideration of complex topologies. We illustrate a particular network topology that can be trained to classify MNIST data (an image dataset of handwritten digits) and neutrino detection data using a restricted form of adiabatic quantum computation known as quantum annealing performed by a D-Wave processor. We provide a brief description of the hardware and how it solves Ising models, how we translate our data into the corresponding Ising models, and how we use available expanded topology options to explore potential performance improvements. Although we focus on the application of quantum annealing in this article, the work discussed here is just one of three approaches we explored as part of a larger project that considers alternative means for training deep learning networks. The other approaches involve using a high performance computing (HPC) environment to automatically find network topologies with good performance and using neuromorphic computing to find a low-power solution for training deep learning networks. Our results show that our quantum approach can find good network parameters in a reasonable time despite increased network topology complexity; that HPC can find good parameters for traditional, simplified network topologies; and that neuromorphic computers can use low power memristive hardware to represent complex topologies and parameters derived from other architecture choices.
As the field of artificial intelligence experiences the emergence of various large-scale models, the computing power requirements are increasing. Simultaneously, Moore’s Law is approaching its limits, which intensifies the need to address how to perform high-dimensional complex data computations efficiently and with minimal energy consumption. Quantum computing and neuromorphic computing, with their unique features, offer potential solutions to this contemporary challenge. In this study, we aim to integrate quantum computing with neuromorphic computing, and develop a quantum spiking neural networks architecture. We proposed three measurement strategy to reducing operational costs, making it more friendly to near-term quantum hardware. We evaluated the performance of these three models on the standard MNIST dataset for classification tasks and found that they maintained a high level of accuracy despite a reduced number of parameters and a substantial decrease in the number of quantum circuit shots.
This research focuses on the architectural design and the performance difference of hybrid quantum and classical machine learning in the context of image processing using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). As we are in the digital era, it's crucial to deal with complex datasets due to the scalability and performance issues. In this research, researchers experienced the use of classical CNNs integration with the quantum computing paradigms. Based on the research findings, we outline the architecture of such hybrid models, highlighting the integration of standard CNN layers with Variational Quantum Circuits (VQCs) and the prominence of the ReLU activation function. The study investigates comparative performance metrics and observations using standard CNNs and adding extra layers in contrast to those of quantum CNNs run on classical hardware, highlighting such metrics as accuracy and computational performance. The findings highlight the feasibility and comparative advantage of hybrid models, suggesting the prospects of improved sophisticated deep image processing methods.