Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Localizing Dirac field states

Aleksander M. Kubicki

Published Sep 17, 2015• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Non-locality and quantum appear together entitling scientific projects and papers quite usually.These are two hardly detachable concepts and modern quantum theories are built up taking into account this aspect explicitly.However, that characteristic turns challenging from a fundamental point of view and can be unhelpful for practical purposes.Here, we construct quantum field theory with deliberately local aspects for a 1+1 dimensional Dirac field in flat spacetime generalizing a recently developed formalism for scalar fields.That purpose is achieved exploiting the non-uniqueness of quantization process.This local construction leads to a natural notion of local quanta and provides a local algebra of operators.As an application, it is shown that the standard vacuum state is a boiling soup of local particles and this fact is connected with a still Gedankenexperiment consisting in slamming down and removing a mirror in an empty cavity. I. MOTIVATION AND BACKGROUNDNon-locality is a feature as intuitively challenging as genuine in the quantum world.The so-successful ordinary representation of quantum field theory (QFT) is based on the information carried by global operators (creation-annihilation operators) related to field excitations with well defined momentum, and therefore, completely delocalized in space.This picture accounts for an innumerable amount of phenomena with an astonishing accuracy, as particle physics or solid state physics shows.However, this conventional formalism can hardly deal with tasks related to local properties of quantum field states.Simple questions as "where is that particle?"or "how are these particles distributed in space?" are unsuccessfully answered in this background.What is more, it is difficult to reconcile the common understanding of a particle as a minute entity in space with the particle notion arising from the ordinary Fock construction, which rather describes excitations spreading in whole space.Furthermore, no localized states can be constructed in such QFT where occupation number representation of a quantum field can be understood as a "momentum" representation in the sense that the number of particles informs about the momentum carried by the field.The problem at this point is that it does not exist a reciprocal "position" representation, we have no local (in space) creation-annihilation operators.This result can be understood as a consequence of Hegerfeldt's theorem.

Related papers

Localization for Dirac fermions

Aleksander M. Kubicki, Westman, Hans, Juan León

This work is devoted to incorporating into QFT the notion that particles and hence the particle states should be localizable in space. It focuses on the case of the Dirac field in 1+1 dimensional flat spacetime, generalizing a recently developed formalism for scalar fields. This is achieved exploiting again the non-uniqueness of quantization process. Instead of elementary excitations carrying definite amounts of energy and momentum, we construct the elementary excitations of the field localized (at some instant) in a definite region of space. This construction not only leads to a natural notion of localized quanta, but also provides a local algebra of operators. Once constructed, the new representation is confronted to the standard global (Fock) construction. In spite of being unitarily inequivalent representations, the localized operators are well defined in the conventional Fock space. By using them we dig up the issues of localization in QFT showing how the globality of the vacuum state is responsible for the lack of a "common sense localization" notion for particles in the standard Fock representation of QFT and propose a method to meet its requirements.

arXiv:1606.03286•Jun 10, 2016•2 citations

Where's that quantum?

Stephan De Bièvre

The nature and properties of the vacuum as well as the meaning and localization properties of one or many particle states have attracted a fair amount of attention and stirred up sometimes heated debate in relativistic quantum field theory over the years. I will review some of the literature on the subject and will then show that these issues arise just as well in non-relativistic theories of extended systems, such as free bose fields. I will argue they should as such not have given rise either to surprise or to controversy. They are in fact the result of the misinterpretation of the vacuum as ``empty space'' and of a too stringent interpretation of field quanta as point particles. I will in particular present a generalization of an apparently little known theorem of Knight on the non-localizability of field quanta, Licht's characterization of localized excitations of the vacuum, and explain how the physical consequences of the Reeh-Schlieder theorem on the cyclicity and separability of the vacuum for local observables are already perfectly familiar from non-relativistic systems of coupled oscillators.

arXiv:math-ph/0607044•Jul 20, 2006•0 citations

Second Quantization and Representation Theory

Edward M. Corson

The formalism of the second quantization is developed entirely within the framework of the Dirac-Jordan representation theory. The equivalence of this formalism and the methods of ordinary coordinate-spin space is shown, and the equations of "connection" are fully developed. It is shown that the "creation" and "annihilation" operators, and indeed all operators which do not commute with the quantized Hamiltonian and hence whose representatives cannot be explicitly given in a configuration space of a fixed number of dimensions are easily treated in terms of the general representation theory and arise quite naturally. Both types of statistics are considered, and the Fock-Dirac density matrix and self-consistent field are treated as a simple illustration.

Physical Review•Nov 1, 1946•2 citations

The concept of particle in Quantum Field theory

Eliano Pessa

Despite its name, Quantum Field Theory (QFT) has been built to describe interactions between localizable particles. For this reason the actual formalism of QFT is partly based on a suitable generalization of the one already used for systems of point particles. This circumstance gives rise to a number of conceptual problems, stemming essentially from the fact that the existence within QFT of non-equivalent representations implies the existence of field theories allowing, within the same theory, different, inequivalent, descriptions of particles. This led some authors to claim that in QFT the concept itself of particle should be abandoned. In this paper we will shortly discuss the validity of this claim, as well as the possibilities, so far existing, of building alternative versions of QFT, not designed in advance to allow some kind of particle representation. We will also spend some words about the generalizations of the concept itself of particle which could grant for a better cohabitation of particles and fields within a wider formulation of QFT. The latter is indispensable if we want to extend the range of application of QFT from particle physics or simple condensed matter physics to other domains of scientific research.

arXiv:0907.0178•Jul 1, 2009•18 citations

A Persistent Particle Ontology for Quantum Field Theory in Terms of the Dirac Sea

Dirk-André Deckert, Michaël Esfeld, Andréa Oldofredi

We show that the Bohmian approach in terms of persisting particles that move on continuous trajectories following a deterministic law can be literally applied to quantum field theory. By means of the Dirac sea model—exemplified in the electron sector of the standard model neglecting radiation—we explain how starting from persisting particles, one is led to standard QFT employing creation and annihilation operators when tracking the dynamics with respect to a reference state, the so-called vacuum. Since on the level of wave functions, both formalisms are mathematically equivalent, this proposal provides for an ontology of QFT that includes a dynamics of individual processes, solves the measurement problem, and explains the appearance of creation and annihilation events. 1. Bohmian Mechanics from Quantum Mechanics to Quantum Field Theory2. The Dirac Sea Model3. Equilibrium States and the Vacuum4. Excitations of the Vacuum and the Fock Space Formalism5. The Appearance of Particle Creations and Annihilations6. The Merits of the Bohmian Approach

The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science•Apr 20, 2017•25 citations

From quantum time to manifestly covariant QFT: On the need for a quantum-action-based quantization

N. L. Diaz

In quantum time (QT) schemes, time is promoted to a degree of freedom, allowing Lorentz covariance to be made explicit for single particles. We ask whether this can be lifted to QFT, so that Lorentz covariance becomes manifest at the Hilbert-space level, rather than being hidden as in the standard canonical formulation. We address this question by proposing a second-quantized approach in which the elementary particle is the QT particle itself, leading naturally to the notion of spacetime field algebras and of quantum action. We show, however, that a naive many-body construction runs into inconsistencies. To pinpoint their origin we introduce a classical counterpart of the second-quantized formalism, spacetime classical mechanics (SCM), and prove a no-go theorem: Dirac quantization of SCM collapses back to standard QFT and therefore hides covariance. We circumvent this problem by presenting a quantum-action-based quantization that yields a spacetime version of quantum mechanics (SQM), making covariance manifest for (interacting) QFTs. Finally, we show that this resolution is tied to a genuine spacetime generalization of the notion of quantum state, required by causality and closely connected to recent ``states over time'' proposals and, in dS/CFT-motivated settings, to microscopic notions of timelike entanglement and emergent time.

quant-pharXiv:2602.23625•Mar 2, 2026
Non-locality and quantum appear together entitling scientific projects and papers quite usually.These are two hardly detachable concepts and modern quantum theories are built up taking into account this aspect explicitly.However, that characteristic turns challenging from a fundamental point of view and can be unhelpful for practical purposes.Here, we construct quantum field theory with deliberately local aspects for a 1+1 dimensional Dirac field in flat spacetime generalizing a recently developed formalism for scalar fields.That purpose is achieved exploiting the non-uniqueness of quantization process.This local construction leads to a natural notion of local quanta and provides a local algebra of operators.As an application, it is shown that the standard vacuum state is a boiling soup of local particles and this fact is connected with a still Gedankenexperiment consisting in slamming down and removing a mirror in an empty cavity. I. MOTIVATION AND BACKGROUNDNon-locality is a feature as intuitively challenging as genuine in the quantum world.The so-successful ordinary representation of quantum field theory (QFT) is based on the information carried by global operators (creation-annihilation operators) related to field excitations with well defined momentum, and therefore, completely delocalized in space.This picture accounts for an innumerable amount of phenomena with an astonishing accuracy, as particle physics or solid state physics shows.However, this conventional formalism can hardly deal with tasks related to local properties of quantum field states.Simple questions as "where is that particle?"or "how are these particles distributed in space?" are unsuccessfully answered in this background.What is more, it is difficult to reconcile the common understanding of a particle as a minute entity in space with the particle notion arising from the ordinary Fock construction, which rather describes excitations spreading in whole space.Furthermore, no localized states can be constructed in such QFT where occupation number representation of a quantum field can be understood as a "momentum" representation in the sense that the number of particles informs about the momentum carried by the field.The problem at this point is that it does not exist a reciprocal "position" representation, we have no local (in space) creation-annihilation operators.This result can be understood as a consequence of Hegerfeldt's theorem.
This work is devoted to incorporating into QFT the notion that particles and hence the particle states should be localizable in space. It focuses on the case of the Dirac field in 1+1 dimensional flat spacetime, generalizing a recently developed formalism for scalar fields. This is achieved exploiting again the non-uniqueness of quantization process. Instead of elementary excitations carrying definite amounts of energy and momentum, we construct the elementary excitations of the field localized (at some instant) in a definite region of space. This construction not only leads to a natural notion of localized quanta, but also provides a local algebra of operators. Once constructed, the new representation is confronted to the standard global (Fock) construction. In spite of being unitarily inequivalent representations, the localized operators are well defined in the conventional Fock space. By using them we dig up the issues of localization in QFT showing how the globality of the vacuum state is responsible for the lack of a "common sense localization" notion for particles in the standard Fock representation of QFT and propose a method to meet its requirements.
The nature and properties of the vacuum as well as the meaning and localization properties of one or many particle states have attracted a fair amount of attention and stirred up sometimes heated debate in relativistic quantum field theory over the years. I will review some of the literature on the subject and will then show that these issues arise just as well in non-relativistic theories of extended systems, such as free bose fields. I will argue they should as such not have given rise either to surprise or to controversy. They are in fact the result of the misinterpretation of the vacuum as ``empty space'' and of a too stringent interpretation of field quanta as point particles. I will in particular present a generalization of an apparently little known theorem of Knight on the non-localizability of field quanta, Licht's characterization of localized excitations of the vacuum, and explain how the physical consequences of the Reeh-Schlieder theorem on the cyclicity and separability of the vacuum for local observables are already perfectly familiar from non-relativistic systems of coupled oscillators.
The formalism of the second quantization is developed entirely within the framework of the Dirac-Jordan representation theory. The equivalence of this formalism and the methods of ordinary coordinate-spin space is shown, and the equations of "connection" are fully developed. It is shown that the "creation" and "annihilation" operators, and indeed all operators which do not commute with the quantized Hamiltonian and hence whose representatives cannot be explicitly given in a configuration space of a fixed number of dimensions are easily treated in terms of the general representation theory and arise quite naturally. Both types of statistics are considered, and the Fock-Dirac density matrix and self-consistent field are treated as a simple illustration.
Despite its name, Quantum Field Theory (QFT) has been built to describe interactions between localizable particles. For this reason the actual formalism of QFT is partly based on a suitable generalization of the one already used for systems of point particles. This circumstance gives rise to a number of conceptual problems, stemming essentially from the fact that the existence within QFT of non-equivalent representations implies the existence of field theories allowing, within the same theory, different, inequivalent, descriptions of particles. This led some authors to claim that in QFT the concept itself of particle should be abandoned. In this paper we will shortly discuss the validity of this claim, as well as the possibilities, so far existing, of building alternative versions of QFT, not designed in advance to allow some kind of particle representation. We will also spend some words about the generalizations of the concept itself of particle which could grant for a better cohabitation of particles and fields within a wider formulation of QFT. The latter is indispensable if we want to extend the range of application of QFT from particle physics or simple condensed matter physics to other domains of scientific research.
We show that the Bohmian approach in terms of persisting particles that move on continuous trajectories following a deterministic law can be literally applied to quantum field theory. By means of the Dirac sea model—exemplified in the electron sector of the standard model neglecting radiation—we explain how starting from persisting particles, one is led to standard QFT employing creation and annihilation operators when tracking the dynamics with respect to a reference state, the so-called vacuum. Since on the level of wave functions, both formalisms are mathematically equivalent, this proposal provides for an ontology of QFT that includes a dynamics of individual processes, solves the measurement problem, and explains the appearance of creation and annihilation events. 1. Bohmian Mechanics from Quantum Mechanics to Quantum Field Theory2. The Dirac Sea Model3. Equilibrium States and the Vacuum4. Excitations of the Vacuum and the Fock Space Formalism5. The Appearance of Particle Creations and Annihilations6. The Merits of the Bohmian Approach
In quantum time (QT) schemes, time is promoted to a degree of freedom, allowing Lorentz covariance to be made explicit for single particles. We ask whether this can be lifted to QFT, so that Lorentz covariance becomes manifest at the Hilbert-space level, rather than being hidden as in the standard canonical formulation. We address this question by proposing a second-quantized approach in which the elementary particle is the QT particle itself, leading naturally to the notion of spacetime field algebras and of quantum action. We show, however, that a naive many-body construction runs into inconsistencies. To pinpoint their origin we introduce a classical counterpart of the second-quantized formalism, spacetime classical mechanics (SCM), and prove a no-go theorem: Dirac quantization of SCM collapses back to standard QFT and therefore hides covariance. We circumvent this problem by presenting a quantum-action-based quantization that yields a spacetime version of quantum mechanics (SQM), making covariance manifest for (interacting) QFTs. Finally, we show that this resolution is tied to a genuine spacetime generalization of the notion of quantum state, required by causality and closely connected to recent ``states over time'' proposals and, in dS/CFT-motivated settings, to microscopic notions of timelike entanglement and emergent time.