Quantum fluids are able to flow past obstacles without creating drag and through channels without any resistance. This superfluidity is a consequence of Bose–Einstein condensation, a process in which all the particles gather in the same, lowest-energy quantum state. At low flow velocities, energy exchanges between the obstacle and the fluid are forbidden because of the twin requirements of energy and momentum conservation. As the flow speed is increased, however, the superfluidity breaks down at some critical velocity above which excitations in the fluid can occur. These excitations can be phonons (i.e. quantized vibrations), vortices or, in the case of superfluid liquid helium, rotons (see Rotons: a low-temperature puzzle by Russell Donnelly Physics World February 1997 p25)
Quantum fluids are able to flow past obstacles without creating drag and through channels without any resistance. This superfluidity is a consequence of Bose–Einstein condensation, a process in which all the particles gather in the same, lowest-energy quantum state. At low flow velocities, energy exchanges between the obstacle and the fluid are forbidden because of the twin requirements of energy and momentum conservation. As the flow speed is increased, however, the superfluidity breaks down at some critical velocity above which excitations in the fluid can occur. These excitations can be phonons (i.e. quantized vibrations), vortices or, in the case of superfluid liquid helium, rotons (see Rotons: a low-temperature puzzle by Russell Donnelly Physics World February 1997 p25)
An object can move through a superfluid without resistance provided that its speed is below a critical value; higher speeds result in the formation of vortices, which are small volumes of normal fluid and superfluid that rotate and dissipate energy. Although the dynamics of these vortices are considered to be crucial in understanding superfluidity, the strong and complex interactions of the superfluid, dissipative forces, and surface effects in most superfluids (such as liquid helium) all combine to obscure observations.
Tornadoes, waterspouts and other atmospheric vortices are instanriy recognizable, but a detailed microscopic understanding of these phenomena continues to elude scientists. The same is true of vortices in super-fluids such as helium-4. Superfluids can flow without friction at low temperatures because the helium-4 atoms, which are bosons, all accumulate in the same quantum state, forming a Bose-Einstein condensate. Yet the strong interactions between the helium-4 atoms have hindered in-depth studies of the microscopic nature of superfluidity. Now Eric Cornell, Carl Wieman and co-workers at the JILA laboratory in Boulder, Colorado, have created a vortex in a dilute gas of rubidium-87, another Bose-Einstein condensate (M Matthews et at. 1999 Plys. Rev. Lett. 83 2498).
At low temperature Quantum Physics can manifest itself at the macroscopic scale in many spectacular ways. Some of its most remarkable features occur when a fluid is stirred. Indeed, as a consequence of the existence of a macroscopic wave-function describing the system, a quantum fluid cannot sustain rigid body rotation by contrast with a classical fluid. Rather, the stirring generates quantized vortices. The recent observation of novel quantum fluids formed by ultra-cold atomic gases allows us to revisit the properties of vortex systems, and to address pending questions of condensed matter physics.
In 1995 two different research groups observed for the first time the Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) in ultracold gases. When the confining magnetic trap was turned off the gas was left free to expand, and the velocity of the particles showed a clear peak: most of the particles were occupying the same single particle state, the one of lowest energy. The Bose-Einstein condensation had been predicted in 1925 by Einstein, written by inspiration of a work on the statistic of the photons by Bose (1924). In this work Bose described the behavior of an ensemble of photons, treating them as massless particles, with no number conservation associated. Einstein extended this approach to particles with a mass and with fixed number, creating what is now called the Bose-Einstein distribution. The particles that follow such a description are called ``bosons'', as opposed to the ``fermions'' of the Fermi-Dirac statistics. Einstein predicted that in a gas of bosons - under a critical temperature - a finite fraction of the total number of particles would have been in the ground state, and act as a single entity. This amusing theoretical discovery found its utility a few years later. In the late thirties, new techniques allowed to cool Helium-4 at few Kelvins above the absolute zero. The properties of the resulting liquid were a puzzlement to the scientific community: among others, it could flow without experiencing friction. The liquid was called a ``superfluid''. A first explanation was given by London in 1938, which linked the superfluid behavior to the presence of a BEC among the bosonic Helium particles. The fermions cannot condense by themselves. On the other hand, they can form bound pairs and act as bosons, as it happens in a metal at low temperature. Using this approach, in 1957 Bardeen, Cooper and Schrieffer created a successful model of superconductivity by describing a superconductor as a superfluid in a charged system. During the course of these years we explored the superfluid properties of Bosons and Fermions in different settings. The original contributions of the thesis are described starting from the third chapter, where we speak about the generation and stability of solitons in a periodic optical lattices, both fixed or in motion. In the fourth chapter we study the generation of giant vortices in cold fermions, by using a generalized hydrodynamical approach. In chapter 5 we study the effect of a quasiperiodic lattice and the glassy phase it produces on a gas of bosons. Finally, we study the interaction of normal matter and superfluids with gravitational waves. While this interaction is seen to be extremely small, we believe that the resulting formalism is interesting by itself.
Fluid turbulence remains an open problem in contemporary physics. In gases or liquids encountered in daily life, turbulence is comprised of swirling vortices of varying sizes, shapes and strengths. The impossibility of making detailed predictions of turbulent flows comes, in part, from the complicated nature of these vortices. Turbulence in quantum mechanical superfluids, on the other hand, is comparatively simple. When stirred, a superfluid produces well-defined, discretised vortex lines, and hence turbulence in these fluids is much more straightforward to interpret. As such, there is hope that the study of vortices in superfluids may hold the key to unlocking the mysteries of turbulence.
The phenomena of superfluidity and superconductivity are intimately connected with the existence of a condensate, a macroscopically occupied quantum state. Such condensates occur in a variety of different physical systems, as described in Chapter 1. The foundation for the description of superfluidity is a picture of the system as being comprised of a condensate and elementary excitations. In Chapter 8 we have seen how physical properties such as the energy and the density of a Bose–Einstein condensed system may be expressed in terms of a contribution from the condensate, plus one from the elementary excitations, and in this chapter we shall consider further developments of this basic idea to other situations. As a first application, we determine the critical velocity for creation of an excitation in a homogeneous system (Sec. 10.1). Following that, we show how to express the momentum density in terms of the velocity of the condensate and the distribution function for excitations. This provides the basis for a two-component description, the two components being the condensate and the thermal excitations (Sec. 10.2). In the past, this framework has proved to be very effective in describing the properties of superfluids and superconductors, and in Sec. 10.3 we apply it to dynamical processes. To describe the state of a superfluid, one must specify the condensate velocity, in addition to the variables needed to characterize the state of an ordinary fluid. As a consequence, the collective behaviour of a superfluid is richer than that of an ordinary one. Collective modes are most simply examined when excitations collide frequently enough that they are in local thermodynamic equilibrium.