Present work reports formation of Young’s double-slit interference fringes using the Young's own theory of diffraction called the theory of boundary diffraction wave. Theory demands that double-slit interference fringes are generated due to superposition of boundary diffraction waves originating from the edges of the slits due to their physical interaction with the incident light. The theoretical development is further verified with the experimental observations.
Present work reports formation of Young’s double-slit interference fringes using the Young's own theory of diffraction called the theory of boundary diffraction wave. Theory demands that double-slit interference fringes are generated due to superposition of boundary diffraction waves originating from the edges of the slits due to their physical interaction with the incident light. The theoretical development is further verified with the experimental observations.
In Young's Double Slit Experiment (YDE) and improved versions, waves causing interference travel different distances.As speed of light is constant, waves require different time spans to reach the point of interference.Thereby, if the waves are generated simultaneously at the slits/source, they cannot meet on the screen anywhere outside the mid-line.Formation of fringes is commonly interpreted as interference caused by the meeting (super-positioning) of two waves generated simultaneously.The reality is that fringes are formed by interference of waves generated at different times.However, unless impacted by other phenomena, two waves generated at different times converging to form fringes, as this paper shows, will mandatorily come in same phase to the interference point, producing constructive interference.Interference observed, however, is not only constructive.The effect on the phase of waves while bending (diffraction) is also to be considered.Consequently, it addresses three phenomena causing phase shifts: (1)different starting times,(2)bending at slits, and (3)distances traveled (In contrast, the first two are overlooked by the conventional approach).(Dirac and Feynman Path Integral methods on quantum particles have different approaches).The paper reveals the widespread misconception in the analysis of YDE and would impact the wave/particle and other YDE interpretations.
Considering double-slit interference as an optical wave passing a through double-slit hard aperture, the intensity expression of Young's double-slit interference is derived based on Collins diffraction integral. The intensity distribution of Young's double-slit interference is graphically demonstrated. The interference fringes will be changes by adjusting the parameter of slit width, double-slit separation, incident wavelength, etc. Meanwhile, the causes for the different brightness at bright fringe center in Young's double-slit interference are discussed. Additionally, the interference fringe width is calculated. The result agrees well with optical interference theory. As an expanding teach method, it will be helpful to understand the double-slit interference characteristics.
The double-slit interference experiment has long been regarded as a cornerstone of the wave theory of light. However, optical interference patterns are absent in everyday life, prompting many scientists to question the validity of the experiment under specific conditions. Until now, no experiments have definitively challenged this theory. Here, we revisit double-slit experiment through experimental validation. Results show that light and dark fringes are not caused by light wave interference, but rather by diffraction from vertical walls of the slits. This discovery challenges the conventional wave interference theory and presents a new perspective on the pulse nature of light, where overlapping spectra enhance energy without cancelation. This research offers novel insights into the nature of light and introduces new perspectives for optical research.
The double-slit interference experiment has long been regarded as a cornerstone of the wave theory of light. However, optical interference patterns are absent in everyday life, prompting many scientists to question the validity of the experiment under specific conditions. Until now, no experiments have definitively challenged this theory. Here, we revisit double-slit experiment through experimental validation. Results show that light and dark fringes are not caused by light wave interference, but rather by diffraction from vertical walls of the slits. This discovery challenges the conventional wave interference theory and presents a new perspective on the pulse nature of light, where overlapping spectra enhance energy without cancelation. This research offers novel insights into the nature of light and introduces new perspectives for optical research.
The double-slit interference experiment has long been regarded as a cornerstone of the wave theory of light. However, optical interference patterns are absent in everyday life, prompting many scientists to question the validity of the experiment under specific conditions. Until now, no experiments have definitively challenged this theory. Here, we revisit double-slit experiment through experimental validation. Results show that light and dark fringes are not caused by light wave interference, but rather by diffraction from vertical walls of the slits. This discovery challenges the conventional wave interference theory and presents a new perspective on the pulse nature of light, where overlapping spectra enhance energy without cancelation. This research offers novel insights into the nature of light and introduces new perspectives for optical research.
Young’s double slit experiment was called as "a phenomenon […] has in it the heart of quantum mechanics. In reality, it contains the only mystery. We cannot make the mystery go away by ‘explaining’ how it works". To study the mystery, we perform the non-crossing-slit-experiments and crossing-slit experiments and show phenomena: (1) in the same double slit or cross double slit experiments, the non-interference patterns gradually evolve to the interference patterns; (2) in the same single slit or cross single slit experiments, the non-diffraction patterns gradually evolve to the diffraction patterns; (3) in the same two-non-parallel-slits experiment, the non-wave patterns gradually evolve to the hybrid pattern (i.e., interference-pattern-embedded-in-diffraction-pattern); (4) in the same curved-double slit experiments, the non-interference patterns evolve to Seashell-shape interference patterns. The above phenomena show new mysteries that are more mysterious than that of the double slit experiments: it is challenge to consistently explain how they work. Those novel phenomena indicate that the standard theories of the double slit are incomplete. Novel experiments bring the search for the new theory of physical/quantum optics.