Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

WORLD SCIENTIFIC (EUROPE) eBooks

“It Ain’t Necessarily So” — Interpretations and Misinterpretations of Quantum Theory

John J. Stachel

Published Nov 14, 2016• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9781786341419_0003

Related papers

It Ain't Necessarily So: Interpretations and Misinterpretations of Quantum Theory

John J. Stachel

The traditional view is that a theory is a conceptual framework providing predictions, and the results of experiments or observations decide whether the theory is right or wrong. It will be contrasted with the modern view that one must incorporate the conditions of applicability of a concept into the very meaning of the concept (measurability analysis), and that only a series of theories (scientific research program) can be said to be scientific or unscientific. This modern view will be applied to a number of questions in quantum mechanics (what is quantization?, states vs processes, open vs closed systems) and quantum field theory (particles and field quanta, bosons vs fermions), and to the search for a theory of quantum gravity (background independent vs fixed background theories).

Proceedings of Frontiers of Fundamental Physics 14 — PoS(FFP14)•Sep 15, 2016•0 citations

The problem of the interpretation of quantum theory

Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker, Thomas Görnitz, Holger Lyre

Springer eBooks•Jan 12, 2007•3 citations

Interpretations of the quantum theory

Ralph Schiller

Synthese•Mar 1, 1962•0 citations

What Went Wrong with the “interpretation” of Quantum Theory?

Robert H. McEachern

This slideshow is a preliminary account of how the misinterpretation of quantum theory originated.

•Jul 1, 2017•0 citations

Epilogue: No “Interpretation”

Sadri Hassani

Quantum mechanics has given scientists valuable lessons in how science works. Unfortunately, it has also been misinterpreted and misrepresented by pseudoscientists and portrayed as an antipode of classical physics. As a result, the majority of the educated public is confused about both the quantum theory and classical Newtonian physics and the relation between the two. We postpone the examination of the misrepresentation of the quantum theory in pseudoscience until Chapter 35. This chapter concentrates, in part, on the characteristics of the theory and how it is similar to (and different from) the classical theory.

CRC Press eBooks•May 7, 2010•0 citations

Interpretation of quantum theory

Benjamin Liebowitz

Il Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. B/Il Nuovo cimento B•Jun 1, 1975•5 citations
The traditional view is that a theory is a conceptual framework providing predictions, and the results of experiments or observations decide whether the theory is right or wrong. It will be contrasted with the modern view that one must incorporate the conditions of applicability of a concept into the very meaning of the concept (measurability analysis), and that only a series of theories (scientific research program) can be said to be scientific or unscientific. This modern view will be applied to a number of questions in quantum mechanics (what is quantization?, states vs processes, open vs closed systems) and quantum field theory (particles and field quanta, bosons vs fermions), and to the search for a theory of quantum gravity (background independent vs fixed background theories).
Quantum mechanics has given scientists valuable lessons in how science works. Unfortunately, it has also been misinterpreted and misrepresented by pseudoscientists and portrayed as an antipode of classical physics. As a result, the majority of the educated public is confused about both the quantum theory and classical Newtonian physics and the relation between the two. We postpone the examination of the misrepresentation of the quantum theory in pseudoscience until Chapter 35. This chapter concentrates, in part, on the characteristics of the theory and how it is similar to (and different from) the classical theory.