Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

A lower bound on expected communication cost of quantum state merging

Anurag Anshu

Published Jun 21, 2015• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

A lower bound on expected communication cost of quantum state redistribution

Anurag Anshu

We show a lower bound on expected communication cost of interactive entanglement assisted quantum state redistribution protocols and a slightly better lower bound for its special case, quantum state transfer. Our bound implies that the expected communication cost of interactive protocols is not significantly better than worst case communication cost, in terms of scaling of error. Furthermore, the bound is independent of the number of rounds. This is in contrast with the classical case, where protocols with expected communication cost significantly better than worst case communication cost are known.

arXiv:1506.06380•Jun 21, 2015•0 citations

A Lower Bound on Entanglement-Assisted Quantum Communication Complexity

Ashley Montanaro, Andreas Winter

Lecture notes in computer science•Aug 25, 2007•6 citations

Asymptotic Compressibility of Entanglement and Classical Communication in Distributed Quantum Computation

Eyuri Wakakuwa, Mio Murao

We consider implementations of a bipartite unitary on many pairs of unknown input states by local operation and classical communication assisted by shared entanglement. We investigate to what extent the entanglement cost and the classical communication cost can be compressed by allowing nonzero but vanishing error in the asymptotic limit of infinite pairs. We show that a lower bound on the minimal entanglement cost, the forward classical communication cost, and the backward classical communication cost per pair is given by the Schmidt strength of the unitary. We also prove that an upper bound on these three kinds of the cost is given by the amount of randomness that is required to partially decouple a tripartite quantum state associated with the unitary. In the proof, we construct a protocol in which quantum state merging is used. For generalized Clifford operators, we show that the lower bound and the upper bound coincide. We then apply our result to the problem of distributed compression of tripartite quantum states, and derive a lower and an upper bound on the optimal quantum communication rate required therein.

arXiv:1310.3991•Oct 15, 2013•3 citations

Computing the Communication Complexity of Quantum Channels

A. Montina, Marcel Pfaffhauser, Stefan Wolf

•Jan 18, 2013•0 citations

Universal quantum state merging

I. Bjelaković, H. Boche, G. Janßen

We determine the optimal entanglement rate of quantum state merging when assuming that the state is unknown except for its membership in a certain set of states. We find that merging is possible at the lowest rate allowed by the individual states. Additionally, we establish a lower bound for the classical cost of state merging under state uncertainty. To this end we give an elementary proof for the cost in case of a perfectly known state which makes no use of the “resource framework.” As applications of our main result, we determine the capacity for one-way entanglement distillation if the source is not perfectly known. Moreover, we give another achievability proof for the entanglement generation capacity over compound quantum channels.

arXiv:1106.2850•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Mar 1, 2013•11 citations

On the Power of Lower Bound Methods for One-Way Quantum Communication Complexity

Shengyu Zhang

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2011•2 citations
We show a lower bound on expected communication cost of interactive entanglement assisted quantum state redistribution protocols and a slightly better lower bound for its special case, quantum state transfer. Our bound implies that the expected communication cost of interactive protocols is not significantly better than worst case communication cost, in terms of scaling of error. Furthermore, the bound is independent of the number of rounds. This is in contrast with the classical case, where protocols with expected communication cost significantly better than worst case communication cost are known.
We consider implementations of a bipartite unitary on many pairs of unknown input states by local operation and classical communication assisted by shared entanglement. We investigate to what extent the entanglement cost and the classical communication cost can be compressed by allowing nonzero but vanishing error in the asymptotic limit of infinite pairs. We show that a lower bound on the minimal entanglement cost, the forward classical communication cost, and the backward classical communication cost per pair is given by the Schmidt strength of the unitary. We also prove that an upper bound on these three kinds of the cost is given by the amount of randomness that is required to partially decouple a tripartite quantum state associated with the unitary. In the proof, we construct a protocol in which quantum state merging is used. For generalized Clifford operators, we show that the lower bound and the upper bound coincide. We then apply our result to the problem of distributed compression of tripartite quantum states, and derive a lower and an upper bound on the optimal quantum communication rate required therein.
We determine the optimal entanglement rate of quantum state merging when assuming that the state is unknown except for its membership in a certain set of states. We find that merging is possible at the lowest rate allowed by the individual states. Additionally, we establish a lower bound for the classical cost of state merging under state uncertainty. To this end we give an elementary proof for the cost in case of a perfectly known state which makes no use of the “resource framework.” As applications of our main result, we determine the capacity for one-way entanglement distillation if the source is not perfectly known. Moreover, we give another achievability proof for the entanglement generation capacity over compound quantum channels.