Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Radial and Azimuthal Profiles of Two-Qubit/Rebit Hilbert-Schmidt Separability Probabilities

Paul B. Slater

Published Oct 25, 2010• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Generalized two-qubit whole and half Hilbert–Schmidt separability probabilities

Paul B. Slater, Charles F. Dunkl

arXiv:1404.1860•Journal of Geometry and Physics•Jan 20, 2015•8 citations

Whole and Half Generalized Two-Qubit Hilbert-Schmidt Separability Probabilities

Paul B. Slater, Charles F. Dunkl

•Apr 7, 2014•1 citation

Lovas-Andai and Slater Two-Rebit and Two-Qubit Separability Functions

Paul B. Slater

•Jan 8, 2017•0 citations

Radial and Azimuthal Profiles of Two-Qubit/Rebit Hilbert-Schmidt Separability Probabilities and Related 3-D Visualization Analyses

Paul B. Slater

Firstly, we reduce the long-standing problem of ascertaining the Hilbert-Schmidt probability that a generic pair of qubits is separable to that of determining the specific nature of a one-dimensional (separability) function of the radial coordinate (r) of the unit ball in 15-dimensional Euclidean space, and similarly for a generic pair of rebits, using the 9-dimensional unit ball. Separability probabilities, could, then, be directly obtained by integrating the products of these functions (which we numerically estimate and plot) with jacobian factors of r^m over r in [0,1], with m=17 for the two-rebit case, and m=29 in the two-qubit instance. Secondly, we repeat the analyses, but for the replacement of r as the free variable, by the azimuthal angle phi \in [0,2 pi]--with the associated jacobian factors now being, trivially, unity. So, the separability probabilities, then, become simply the areas under the curves generated. For our analyses, we employ an interesting Cholesky-decomposition parameterization of the 4 x 4 density matrices. Thirdly, in an exploratory investigation, we examine the Hilbert-Schmidt separability probability question using the three-dimensional visualization (cube/tetrahedron/octahedron) of two qubits associated with Avron, Bisker and Kenneth, and Leinaas, Myrheim and Ovrum, among others.

arXiv:1010.5180•Oct 25, 2010•1 citation

Qubit-qudit separability/PPT-probability investigations, including Lovas-Andai formula advancements

Paul B. Slater

We begin by advancing conjectures, closely fitting numerical estimates, for the Hilbert-Schmidt separability/PPT probabilities of the 35- and 63-dimensional convex sets of ($2 \times 3$) qubit-qutrit and ($2 \times 4$) qubit-qudit states, as well as certain related scenarios. We reason that the underlying volume formulas might closely parallel those now well-established--via a Lovas-Andai formula--in their lower (15)-dimensional two-qubit analogue. The qubit-qutrit conjecture we obtain is $(\frac{3}{10})^3 =\frac{3^3}{2^3 \cdot 5^3} = \frac{27}{1000} =0.027$, with the counterpart two-qubit separability probablity being $\frac{8}{33}=\frac{2^3}{3 \cdot 11} \approx 0.242424$. In the ($2 \times 4$) qubit-qudit case, we advance $\frac{16}{12375} =\frac{4^2}{3^2 \cdot 5^3 \cdot 11} \approx 0.001292929$ as the PPT-probability. The numerators of the probabilities for $2 \times m$ scenarios are, thus, possibly simply powers of $m$. We also search for the rebit-retrit counterpart to the established two-rebit result of $\frac{29}{64} =\frac{29}{2^6} \approx 0.453125$. Additionally, we find that the Hilbert-Schmidt separability/PPT-probabilities for the two-rebit, rebit-retrit and two-retrit $X$-states all equal $\frac{16}{3 \pi^2} \approx 0.54038$, as well as more generally, that the probabilities based on induced measures are equal across these three sets of $X$-states. Then, we extend the Lovas-Andai two-qubit framework from Hilbert-Schmidt measures to induced ones, raising the possibility of a still more general master formula.

•Mar 28, 2018•0 citations

Qubit-Qudit Separability/PPT-Probability Analyses and Lovas-Andai Formula Extensions to Induced Measures

Paul B. Slater

We begin by seeking the qubit-qutrit and rebit-retrit counterparts to the now well-established Hilbert-Schmidt separability probabilities for (the 15-dimensional convex set of) two-qubits of $\frac{8}{33} = \frac{2^3}{3 \cdot 11} \approx 0.242424$ and (the 9-dimensional) two-rebits of $\frac{29}{64} =\frac{29}{2^6} \approx 0.453125$. Based in part on extensive numerical computations, we advance the possibilities of a qubit-qutrit value of $\frac{27}{1000} = (\frac{3}{10})^3 =\frac{3^3}{2^3 \cdot 5^3} = 0.027$ and a rebit-retrit one of $\frac{860}{6561} =\frac{2^2 \cdot 5 \cdot 43}{3^8} \approx 0.131078$. These four values for $2 \times m$ systems ($m=2,3$) suggest certain numerator/denominator sequences involving powers of $m$, which we further investigate for $m>3$. Additionally, we find that the Hilbert-Schmidt separability/PPT-probabilities for the two-rebit, rebit-retrit and two-retrit $X$-states all equal $\frac{16}{3 π^2} \approx 0.54038$, as well as more generally, that the probabilities based on induced measures are equal across these three sets of $X$-states. Then, we extend the generalized two-qubit framework introduced by Lovas and Andai from Hilbert-Schmidt measures to induced ones. For instance, while the Lovas-Andai two-qubit function is $\frac{1}{3} \varepsilon^2 (4 -\varepsilon^2)$, yielding $\frac{8}{33}$, its $k=1$ induced measure counterpart is $\frac{1}{4} \varepsilon ^2 \left(3-\varepsilon ^2\right)^2$, yielding $\frac{61}{143} =\frac{61}{11 \cdot 13} \approx 0.426573$, where $\varepsilon$ is a singular-value ratio. We investigate, in these regards, the possibility of extending the previously-obtained "Lovas-Andai master formula".

arXiv:1803.10680•Mar 28, 2018•1 citation
Firstly, we reduce the long-standing problem of ascertaining the Hilbert-Schmidt probability that a generic pair of qubits is separable to that of determining the specific nature of a one-dimensional (separability) function of the radial coordinate (r) of the unit ball in 15-dimensional Euclidean space, and similarly for a generic pair of rebits, using the 9-dimensional unit ball. Separability probabilities, could, then, be directly obtained by integrating the products of these functions (which we numerically estimate and plot) with jacobian factors of r^m over r in [0,1], with m=17 for the two-rebit case, and m=29 in the two-qubit instance. Secondly, we repeat the analyses, but for the replacement of r as the free variable, by the azimuthal angle phi \in [0,2 pi]--with the associated jacobian factors now being, trivially, unity. So, the separability probabilities, then, become simply the areas under the curves generated. For our analyses, we employ an interesting Cholesky-decomposition parameterization of the 4 x 4 density matrices. Thirdly, in an exploratory investigation, we examine the Hilbert-Schmidt separability probability question using the three-dimensional visualization (cube/tetrahedron/octahedron) of two qubits associated with Avron, Bisker and Kenneth, and Leinaas, Myrheim and Ovrum, among others.
We begin by advancing conjectures, closely fitting numerical estimates, for the Hilbert-Schmidt separability/PPT probabilities of the 35- and 63-dimensional convex sets of (2×32 \times 32×3) qubit-qutrit and (2×42 \times 42×4) qubit-qudit states, as well as certain related scenarios. We reason that the underlying volume formulas might closely parallel those now well-established--via a Lovas-Andai formula--in their lower (15)-dimensional two-qubit analogue. The qubit-qutrit conjecture we obtain is (310)3=3323⋅53=271000=0.027(\frac{3}{10})^3 =\frac{3^3}{2^3 \cdot 5^3} = \frac{27}{1000} =0.027(103​)3=23⋅5333​=100027​=0.027, with the counterpart two-qubit separability probablity being 833=233⋅11≈0.242424\frac{8}{33}=\frac{2^3}{3 \cdot 11} \approx 0.242424338​=3⋅1123​≈0.242424. In the (2×42 \times 42×4) qubit-qudit case, we advance 1612375=4232⋅53⋅11≈0.001292929\frac{16}{12375} =\frac{4^2}{3^2 \cdot 5^3 \cdot 11} \approx 0.0012929291237516​=32⋅53⋅1142​≈0.001292929 as the PPT-probability. The numerators of the probabilities for 2×m2 \times m2×m scenarios are, thus, possibly simply powers of mmm. We also search for the rebit-retrit counterpart to the established two-rebit result of 2964=2926≈0.453125\frac{29}{64} =\frac{29}{2^6} \approx 0.4531256429​=2629​≈0.453125. Additionally, we find that the Hilbert-Schmidt separability/PPT-probabilities for the two-rebit, rebit-retrit and two-retrit XXX-states all equal 163π2≈0.54038\frac{16}{3 \pi^2} \approx 0.540383π216​≈0.54038, as well as more generally, that the probabilities based on induced measures are equal across these three sets of XXX-states. Then, we extend the Lovas-Andai two-qubit framework from Hilbert-Schmidt measures to induced ones, raising the possibility of a still more general master formula.
We begin by seeking the qubit-qutrit and rebit-retrit counterparts to the now well-established Hilbert-Schmidt separability probabilities for (the 15-dimensional convex set of) two-qubits of 833=233⋅11≈0.242424\frac{8}{33} = \frac{2^3}{3 \cdot 11} \approx 0.242424338​=3⋅1123​≈0.242424 and (the 9-dimensional) two-rebits of 2964=2926≈0.453125\frac{29}{64} =\frac{29}{2^6} \approx 0.4531256429​=2629​≈0.453125. Based in part on extensive numerical computations, we advance the possibilities of a qubit-qutrit value of 271000=(310)3=3323⋅53=0.027\frac{27}{1000} = (\frac{3}{10})^3 =\frac{3^3}{2^3 \cdot 5^3} = 0.027100027​=(103​)3=23⋅5333​=0.027 and a rebit-retrit one of 8606561=22⋅5⋅4338≈0.131078\frac{860}{6561} =\frac{2^2 \cdot 5 \cdot 43}{3^8} \approx 0.1310786561860​=3822⋅5⋅43​≈0.131078. These four values for 2×m2 \times m2×m systems (m=2,3m=2,3m=2,3) suggest certain numerator/denominator sequences involving powers of mmm, which we further investigate for m>3m>3m>3. Additionally, we find that the Hilbert-Schmidt separability/PPT-probabilities for the two-rebit, rebit-retrit and two-retrit XXX-states all equal 163π2≈0.54038\frac{16}{3 π^2} \approx 0.540383π216​≈0.54038, as well as more generally, that the probabilities based on induced measures are equal across these three sets of XXX-states. Then, we extend the generalized two-qubit framework introduced by Lovas and Andai from Hilbert-Schmidt measures to induced ones. For instance, while the Lovas-Andai two-qubit function is 13ε2(4−ε2)\frac{1}{3} \varepsilon^2 (4 -\varepsilon^2)31​ε2(4−ε2), yielding 833\frac{8}{33}338​, its k=1k=1k=1 induced measure counterpart is 14ε2(3−ε2)2\frac{1}{4} \varepsilon ^2 \left(3-\varepsilon ^2\right)^241​ε2(3−ε2)2, yielding 61143=6111⋅13≈0.426573\frac{61}{143} =\frac{61}{11 \cdot 13} \approx 0.42657314361​=11⋅1361​≈0.426573, where ε\varepsilonε is a singular-value ratio. We investigate, in these regards, the possibility of extending the previously-obtained "Lovas-Andai master formula".