Single-Gate Error for Superconducting Qubits Imposed by Sideband Products of IQ Mixing

High-fidelity control of superconducting qubits requires carefully shaped microwave pulses to avoid several different kinds of error at once. This article is a pedagogical bridging text aimed at upper-level undergraduate and early graduate students who have completed an introductory quantum mechanics course and a first course in quantum computing or quantum information, but who have not yet encountered the physical implementation of qubit gates. We integrate physical intuition for pulse design, analytical gate-level descriptions, and practical hardware considerations into a single, derivation-driven narrative, with explicit learning objectives. We begin with simple pulse envelopes and their spectral properties, showing how finite bandwidth produces leakage outside the computational subspace. This motivates the derivative removal by adiabatic gate (DRAG) technique, which we derive explicitly using the Magnus expansion, obtaining a clear, order-by-order account of which physical error channel appears at which order and why DRAG's cancellation is necessarily incomplete. We discuss the practical hardware realities of control pulse generation, focusing on arbitrary waveform generators (AWG), local oscillators (LO), and IQ mixing. Finally, we extend the discussion to two-qubit operation via the cross-resonance gate, and interpret how driving the control qubit at the target qubit's transition frequency necessarily produces several unwanted interaction terms alongside the desired one, and how successive generations of pulse-engineering strategies have been designed to suppress them.High-fidelity control of superconducting qubits requires carefully shaped microwave pulses to avoid several different kinds of error at once. This article is a pedagogical bridging text aimed at upper-level undergraduate and early graduate students who have completed an introductory quantum mechanics course and a first course in quantum computing or quantum information, but who have not yet encountered the physical implementation of qubit gates. We integrate physical intuition for pulse design, analytical gate-level descriptions, and practical hardware considerations into a single, derivation-driven narrative, with explicit learning objectives. We begin with simple pulse envelopes and their spectral properties, showing how finite bandwidth produces leakage outside the computational subspace. This motivates the derivative removal by adiabatic gate (DRAG) technique, which we derive explicitly using the Magnus expansion, obtaining a clear, order-by-order account of which physical error channel appears at which order and why DRAG's cancellation is necessarily incomplete. We discuss the practical hardware realities of control pulse generation, focusing on arbitrary waveform generators (AWG), local oscillators (LO), and IQ mixing. Finally, we extend the discussion to two-qubit operation via the cross-resonance gate, and interpret how driving the control qubit at the target qubit's transition frequency necessarily produces several unwanted interaction terms alongside the desired one, and how successive generations of pulse-engineering strategies have been designed to suppress them.

quant-pharXiv:2604.21565Apr 24, 20260 citations

Frequency Up-Conversion Schemes for Controlling Superconducting Qubits

J. Herrmann, Christoph Hellings, Stefania Lazar +8 more

High-fidelity control of superconducting qubits requires the generation of microwave-frequency pulses precisely tailored on nanosecond timescales. These pulses are most commonly synthesized by up-converting and superimposing two narrow-band intermediate-frequency signals referred to as the in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) components. While the calibration of their DC-offsets, relative amplitude and phase allows one to cancel unwanted sideband and carrier leakage, this IQ mixing approach suffers from the presence of additional spurious frequency components. Here, we experimentally study an alternative approach based on double frequency conversion, which overcomes this challenge and circumvents the need for IQ-calibration. We find a spurious-free dynamic range of more than 70 $\,$ dB and compare the quality of pulse generation against a state-of-the-art IQ mixing scheme by performing repeated single-qubit randomized benchmarking on a superconducting qubit.High-fidelity control of superconducting qubits requires the generation of microwave-frequency pulses precisely tailored on nanosecond timescales. These pulses are most commonly synthesized by up-converting and superimposing two narrow-band intermediate-frequency signals referred to as the in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) components. While the calibration of their DC-offsets, relative amplitude and phase allows one to cancel unwanted sideband and carrier leakage, this IQ mixing approach suffers from the presence of additional spurious frequency components. Here, we experimentally study an alternative approach based on double frequency conversion, which overcomes this challenge and circumvents the need for IQ-calibration. We find a spurious-free dynamic range of more than 70$\,$dB and compare the quality of pulse generation against a state-of-the-art IQ mixing scheme by performing repeated single-qubit randomized benchmarking on a superconducting qubit.

arXiv:2210.02513Oct 5, 20226 citations

\,

dB and compare the quality of pulse generation against a state-of-the-art IQ mixing scheme by performing repeated single-qubit randomized benchmarking on a superconducting qubit.