We study a variant of quantum hypothesis testing wherein an additional ‘inconclusive’ measurement outcome is added, allowing one to abstain from attempting to discriminate the hypotheses. The error probabilities are then conditioned on a successful attempt, with inconclusive trials disregarded. We completely characterise this task in both the single-shot and asymptotic regimes, providing exact formulas for the optimal error probabilities. In particular, we prove that the asymptotic error exponent of discriminating any two quantum states$\rho $and$ \sigma $is given by the Hilbert projective metric$ D_{\max }(\rho \|\sigma ) + D_{\max }(\sigma \| \rho ) $in asymmetric hypothesis testing, and by the Thompson metric$ \max \! \big \{ D_{\max }(\rho \|\sigma ),\, D_{\max }(\sigma \| \rho ) \big \}$in symmetric hypothesis testing. This endows these two quantities with fundamental operational interpretations in quantum state discrimination. Our findings extend to composite hypothesis testing, where we show that the asymmetric error exponent with respect to any convex set of density matrices is given by a regularisation of the Hilbert projective metric. We apply our results also to quantum channels, showing that no advantage is gained by employing adaptive or even more general discrimination schemes over parallel ones, in both the asymmetric and symmetric settings. Our state discrimination results make use of no properties specific to quantum mechanics and are also valid in general probabilistic theories.We study a variant of quantum hypothesis testing wherein an additional ‘inconclusive’ measurement outcome is added, allowing one to abstain from attempting to discriminate the hypotheses. The error probabilities are then conditioned on a successful attempt, with inconclusive trials disregarded. We completely characterise this task in both the single-shot and asymptotic regimes, providing exact formulas for the optimal error probabilities. In particular, we prove that the asymptotic error exponent of discriminating any two quantum states$\rho $and$\sigma $is given by the Hilbert projective metric$D_{\max }(\rho \|\sigma ) + D_{\max }(\sigma \| \rho )$in asymmetric hypothesis testing, and by the Thompson metric$\max \! \big \{ D_{\max }(\rho \|\sigma ),\, D_{\max }(\sigma \| \rho ) \big \}$in symmetric hypothesis testing. This endows these two quantities with fundamental operational interpretations in quantum state discrimination. Our findings extend to composite hypothesis testing, where we show that the asymmetric error exponent with respect to any convex set of density matrices is given by a regularisation of the Hilbert projective metric. We apply our results also to quantum channels, showing that no advantage is gained by employing adaptive or even more general discrimination schemes over parallel ones, in both the asymmetric and symmetric settings. Our state discrimination results make use of no properties specific to quantum mechanics and are also valid in general probabilistic theories.

arXiv:2209.10550IEEE Transactions on Information TheoryJul 28, 202311 citations

Quantum hypothesis testing and state discrimination

J. Prabhu Tej, Syed Raunaq Ahmed, A. R. Usha Devi +1 more

This expository article gives an overview of the theory of hypothesis testing of quantum states in finite dimensional Hilbert spaces. Optimal measurement strategy for testing binary quantum hypotheses, which result in minimum error probability, is discussed. Collective and individual adaptive measurement strategies in testing hypotheses in the multiple copy scenario, with various upper and lower bounds on error probability, are outlined. A brief account on quantum channel discrimination and the role of entangled states in achieving enhanced precision in the task of channel discrimination is given.This expository article gives an overview of the theory of hypothesis testing of quantum states in finite dimensional Hilbert spaces. Optimal measurement strategy for testing binary quantum hypotheses, which result in minimum error probability, is discussed. Collective and individual adaptive measurement strategies in testing hypotheses in the multiple copy scenario, with various upper and lower bounds on error probability, are outlined. A brief account on quantum channel discrimination and the role of entangled states in achieving enhanced precision in the task of channel discrimination is given.

arXiv:1803.04944Mar 13, 20185 citations

Discrimination Among Quantum States

Masashi Ban

International Journal of Theoretical PhysicsJan 1, 20044 citations

Discrimination and identification of quantum states

Ulrike Futschik

Jan 1, 20100 citations

Quantum Hypothesis Testing and State Discrimination

Prabhu Tej, Syed Raunaq Ahmed, I. Reena +2 more

This lecture notes gives a basic survey of the theory of hypothesis testing of quantum states in finite dimensional Hilbert spaces. Optimal measurement strategy for testing binary quantum hypotheses, which result in minimum error probability, is discussed. Collective and individual adaptive measurement strategies in testing hypotheses in the multiple copy scenario, with various upper and lower bounds on error probability, are outlined. A brief account on quantum channel discrimination and the role of entangled states in achieving enhanced precision in the task of channel discrimination is given.This lecture notes gives a basic survey of the theory of hypothesis testing of quantum states in finite dimensional Hilbert spaces. Optimal measurement strategy for testing binary quantum hypotheses, which result in minimum error probability, is discussed. Collective and individual adaptive measurement strategies in testing hypotheses in the multiple copy scenario, with various upper and lower bounds on error probability, are outlined. A brief account on quantum channel discrimination and the role of entangled states in achieving enhanced precision in the task of channel discrimination is given.

International Journal of Research and Analysis in Science and EngineeringSep 28, 20210 citations

and

\sigma

is given by the Hilbert projective metric

D_{\max }(\rho \|\sigma ) + D_{\max }(\sigma \| \rho )

in asymmetric hypothesis testing, and by the Thompson metric

\max \! \big \{ D_{\max }(\rho \|\sigma ),\, D_{\max }(\sigma \| \rho ) \big \}$in symmetric hypothesis testing. This endows these two quantities with fundamental operational interpretations in quantum state discrimination. Our findings extend to composite hypothesis testing, where we show that the asymmetric error exponent with respect to any convex set of density matrices is given by a regularisation of the Hilbert projective metric. We apply our results also to quantum channels, showing that no advantage is gained by employing adaptive or even more general discrimination schemes over parallel ones, in both the asymmetric and symmetric settings. Our state discrimination results make use of no properties specific to quantum mechanics and are also valid in general probabilistic theories.