Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Science Advances

Verifying Heisenberg’s error-disturbance relation using a single trapped ion

Fei Zhou, L.-L. Yan, Shijie Gong, Zhihao Ma, Jiu-Zhou He, Tian‐Jian Xiong, Liang Chen, Wanli Yang, Mang Feng, Vlatko Vedral

Published Oct 7, 2016• 37 citations
Publisher

Abstract

ion trapped in a harmonic potential. By performing unitary operations under carrier transitions, we verify the uncertainty relation proposed by Busch, Lahti, and Werner (BLW) based on a general error-trade-off relation for joint measurements on two compatible observables. The positive operator-valued measure, required by the compatible observables, is constructed by single-qubit operations, and the lower bound of the uncertainty, as observed, is satisfied in a state-independent manner. Our results provide the first evidence confirming the BLW-formulated uncertainty at a single-spin level and will stimulate broad interests in various fields associated with quantum mechanics.

DOI
10.1126/sciadv.1600578

Related papers

Optimal joint measurements of complementary observables by a single trapped ion

Tian‐Jian Xiong, L.-L. Yan, Zhihao Ma +5 more

The uncertainty relations, pioneered by Werner Heisenberg nearly 90 years ago, set a fundamental limitation on the joint measurability of complementary observables. This limitation has long been a subject of debate, which has been reignited recently due to new proposed forms of measurement uncertainty relations. The present work is associated with a new error trade-off relation for compatible observables approximating two incompatible observables, in keeping with the spirit of Heisenberg's original ideas of 1927. We report the first direct test and confirmation of the tight bounds prescribed by such an error trade-off relation, based on an experimental realisation of optimal joint measurements of complementary observables using a single ultracold ion trapped in a harmonic potential. Our work provides a prototypical determination of ultimate joint measurement error bounds with potential applications in quantum information science for high-precision measurement and information security.

arXiv:1705.01385•New Journal of Physics•May 3, 2017•9 citations

Experimental investigation of joint measurement uncertainty relations for three incompatible observables at a single-spin level

K. Rehan, Tian‐Jian Xiong, L.-L. Yan +6 more

In the light of the Busch, Lathi and Werner proposal, we explore, for the first time, the joint measurements and confirmation of uncertainty relations for three incompatible observables that reflect the original spirit proposed by Heisenberg in 1927. We first develop the error trade-off relations theoretically and then demonstrate the first experimental witness of joint measurements using a single ultracold 40Ca+ ion trapped in a harmonic potential. In addition, we report, that in contrast to the case of two observables, scarifying accuracy of any one of the three observables the rest of two can be measured with ultimate accuracy.

Optics Express•Aug 8, 2020•3 citations

Single-qubit measurement of Heisenberg uncertainty lower bounds for three incompatible observables

Rehan, K., Tian‐Jian Xiong, L.-L. Yan +6 more

Being one of the centroidal concepts in quantum theory, the fundamental constraint imposed by Heisenberg uncertainty relations has always been a subject of immense attention and challenging in the context of joint measurements of general quantum mechanical observables. In particular, the recent extension of the original uncertainty relations has grabbed a distinct research focus and set a new ascendent target in quantum mechanics and quantum information processing. In the present work we explore the joint measurements of three incompatible observables, following the basic idea of a newly proposed error trade-off relation. In comparison to the counterpart of two incompatible observables, the joint measurements of three incompatible observables are more complex and of more primal interest in understanding quantum mechanical measurements. Attributed to the pristine idea proposed by Heisenberg in 1927, we develop the error trade-off relations for compatible observables to categorically approximate the three incompatible observables. Implementing these relations we demonstrate the first experimental witness of the joint measurements for three incompatible observables using a single ultracold $^{40}Ca^{+}$ ion in a harmonic potential. We anticipate that our inquisition would be of vital importance for quantum precision measurement and other allied quantum information technologies.

arXiv:1909.09337•Sep 20, 2019•0 citations

Heisenberg's error-disturbance relations: A joint measurement-based experimental test

Yuanyuan Zhao, Paweł Kurzyński, Guo‐Yong Xiang +2 more

The original Heisenberg error-disturbance relation was recently shown to be not universally valid and two different approaches to reformulate it were proposed. The first one focuses on how the error and disturbance of two observables $A$ and $B$ depend on a particular quantum state. The second one asks how a joint measurement of $A$ and $B$ affects their eigenstates. Previous experiments focused on the first approach. Here we focus on the second one. First, we propose and implement an extendible method of quantum-walk-based joint measurements of noisy Pauli operators to test the error-disturbance relation for qubits introduced in the work of Busch et al. [Phys. Rev. A 89, 012129 (2014)], where the polarization of the single photon, corresponding to a walker's auxiliary degree of freedom that is commonly known as a coin, undergoes a position- and time-dependent evolution. Then we formulate and experimentally test a universally valid state-dependent relation for three mutually unbiased observables. We therefore establish a method of testing error-disturbance relations.

arXiv:1512.07050•Physical Review A•Apr 7, 2017•8 citations

Heisenberg uncertainty for qubit measurements

Paul Busch, PEKKA J. LAHTI, Reinhard F. Werner

Reports on experiments recently performed in Vienna [Erhard et al., Nature Phys. 8, 185 (2012)] and Toronto [Rozema et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 100404 (2012)] include claims of a violation of Heisenberg's error-disturbance relation. In contrast, we have presented and proven a Heisenberg-type relation for joint measurements of position and momentum [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 160405 (2013)]. To resolve the apparent conflict, we formulate here a general trade-off relation for errors in qubit measurements, using the same concepts as we did in the position-momentum case. We show that the combined errors in an approximate joint measurement of a pair of $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1$-valued observables $A,B$ are tightly bounded from below by a quantity that measures the degree of incompatibility of $A$ and $B$. The claim of a violation of Heisenberg is shown to fail because it is based on unsuitable measures of error and disturbance. Finally we show how the experiments mentioned may directly be used to test our error inequality.

arXiv:1311.0837•Physical Review A•Jan 31, 2014•119 citations

Proof of Heisenberg's Error-Disturbance Relation for Individual Measurements

Seiji Kosugi

Heisenberg originally envisioned the error-disturbance relation under the premise that the state after measurement must remain consistent with the Kennard-Robertson uncertainty relation. This implies that the measurement error must be formulated via a posterior observable $\hat{x}_t$, rather than a prior observable $\hat{x}_0$, because the posterior measurement error determines the post-measurement uncertainty of the electron. Building upon the preliminary conceptual foundation reported in arXiv:1504.03779, this paper presents a rigorous derivation of the error-disturbance principle formulated from the unitary transformation equations of observables. Each readout $X$ of a posterior probe observable $\hat{X}_t$ completes a single measurement event, producing a specific conditional object state. The Kennard-Robertson uncertainty relation must hold for these states. Specifically, we show that the uncertainty relation between the error $ε_{X}(\hat{x}_t)$ and the disturbance $η_{X}(\hat{p}_0)$ holds strictly at the level of individual measurements, characterized by the specific readout $X$. We also verify that conventional error-disturbance relations, where the errors are evaluated by averaging over the unconditioned state, hold true. Our results provide a refined theoretical basis for understanding the fundamental trade-off in individual measurement outcomes.

quant-pharXiv:2609.18211•Sep 17, 2026•0 citations
ion trapped in a harmonic potential. By performing unitary operations under carrier transitions, we verify the uncertainty relation proposed by Busch, Lahti, and Werner (BLW) based on a general error-trade-off relation for joint measurements on two compatible observables. The positive operator-valued measure, required by the compatible observables, is constructed by single-qubit operations, and the lower bound of the uncertainty, as observed, is satisfied in a state-independent manner. Our results provide the first evidence confirming the BLW-formulated uncertainty at a single-spin level and will stimulate broad interests in various fields associated with quantum mechanics.
The uncertainty relations, pioneered by Werner Heisenberg nearly 90 years ago, set a fundamental limitation on the joint measurability of complementary observables. This limitation has long been a subject of debate, which has been reignited recently due to new proposed forms of measurement uncertainty relations. The present work is associated with a new error trade-off relation for compatible observables approximating two incompatible observables, in keeping with the spirit of Heisenberg's original ideas of 1927. We report the first direct test and confirmation of the tight bounds prescribed by such an error trade-off relation, based on an experimental realisation of optimal joint measurements of complementary observables using a single ultracold ion trapped in a harmonic potential. Our work provides a prototypical determination of ultimate joint measurement error bounds with potential applications in quantum information science for high-precision measurement and information security.
In the light of the Busch, Lathi and Werner proposal, we explore, for the first time, the joint measurements and confirmation of uncertainty relations for three incompatible observables that reflect the original spirit proposed by Heisenberg in 1927. We first develop the error trade-off relations theoretically and then demonstrate the first experimental witness of joint measurements using a single ultracold 40Ca+ ion trapped in a harmonic potential. In addition, we report, that in contrast to the case of two observables, scarifying accuracy of any one of the three observables the rest of two can be measured with ultimate accuracy.
Being one of the centroidal concepts in quantum theory, the fundamental constraint imposed by Heisenberg uncertainty relations has always been a subject of immense attention and challenging in the context of joint measurements of general quantum mechanical observables. In particular, the recent extension of the original uncertainty relations has grabbed a distinct research focus and set a new ascendent target in quantum mechanics and quantum information processing. In the present work we explore the joint measurements of three incompatible observables, following the basic idea of a newly proposed error trade-off relation. In comparison to the counterpart of two incompatible observables, the joint measurements of three incompatible observables are more complex and of more primal interest in understanding quantum mechanical measurements. Attributed to the pristine idea proposed by Heisenberg in 1927, we develop the error trade-off relations for compatible observables to categorically approximate the three incompatible observables. Implementing these relations we demonstrate the first experimental witness of the joint measurements for three incompatible observables using a single ultracold 40Ca+^{40}Ca^{+}40Ca+ ion in a harmonic potential. We anticipate that our inquisition would be of vital importance for quantum precision measurement and other allied quantum information technologies.
The original Heisenberg error-disturbance relation was recently shown to be not universally valid and two different approaches to reformulate it were proposed. The first one focuses on how the error and disturbance of two observables AAA and BBB depend on a particular quantum state. The second one asks how a joint measurement of AAA and BBB affects their eigenstates. Previous experiments focused on the first approach. Here we focus on the second one. First, we propose and implement an extendible method of quantum-walk-based joint measurements of noisy Pauli operators to test the error-disturbance relation for qubits introduced in the work of Busch et al. [Phys. Rev. A 89, 012129 (2014)], where the polarization of the single photon, corresponding to a walker's auxiliary degree of freedom that is commonly known as a coin, undergoes a position- and time-dependent evolution. Then we formulate and experimentally test a universally valid state-dependent relation for three mutually unbiased observables. We therefore establish a method of testing error-disturbance relations.
Reports on experiments recently performed in Vienna [Erhard et al., Nature Phys. 8, 185 (2012)] and Toronto [Rozema et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 100404 (2012)] include claims of a violation of Heisenberg's error-disturbance relation. In contrast, we have presented and proven a Heisenberg-type relation for joint measurements of position and momentum [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 160405 (2013)]. To resolve the apparent conflict, we formulate here a general trade-off relation for errors in qubit measurements, using the same concepts as we did in the position-momentum case. We show that the combined errors in an approximate joint measurement of a pair of $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1$-valued observables A,BA,BA,B are tightly bounded from below by a quantity that measures the degree of incompatibility of AAA and BBB. The claim of a violation of Heisenberg is shown to fail because it is based on unsuitable measures of error and disturbance. Finally we show how the experiments mentioned may directly be used to test our error inequality.
Heisenberg originally envisioned the error-disturbance relation under the premise that the state after measurement must remain consistent with the Kennard-Robertson uncertainty relation. This implies that the measurement error must be formulated via a posterior observable x^t\hat{x}_tx^t​, rather than a prior observable x^0\hat{x}_0x^0​, because the posterior measurement error determines the post-measurement uncertainty of the electron. Building upon the preliminary conceptual foundation reported in arXiv:1504.03779, this paper presents a rigorous derivation of the error-disturbance principle formulated from the unitary transformation equations of observables. Each readout XXX of a posterior probe observable X^t\hat{X}_tX^t​ completes a single measurement event, producing a specific conditional object state. The Kennard-Robertson uncertainty relation must hold for these states. Specifically, we show that the uncertainty relation between the error εX(x^t)ε_{X}(\hat{x}_t)εX​(x^t​) and the disturbance ηX(p^0)η_{X}(\hat{p}_0)ηX​(p^​0​) holds strictly at the level of individual measurements, characterized by the specific readout XXX. We also verify that conventional error-disturbance relations, where the errors are evaluated by averaging over the unconditioned state, hold true. Our results provide a refined theoretical basis for understanding the fundamental trade-off in individual measurement outcomes.