Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Methods for constructing and decoding block error-correcting codes

Abdullah A. Hashim

Published Jan 1, 1974• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Sequential Decoding Algorithms for Block Error-Correcting Codes

Yibin Ng, Wai Ho Mow

•Jan 1, 1998•0 citations

An improvement of insertion/deletion/substitution error correction capabilities of LDPC codes using slide decoding

Tooru Shigehiro, Hirohisa Yabe, Keiichi Iwamura

This study investigates insertion, deletion, and substitution error correcting codes constructed with low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes. The studies for insertion/deletion/substitution error correcting codes are few comparing with substitution error correcting codes. We improve insertion/deletion/substitution error correction capabilities of LDPC codes using slide decoding for modified check matrix. Our evaluation shows that the block error rate of the proposed method is lower than that of the conventional method using marker codes.

International Symposium on Information Theory and its Applications•Dec 1, 2012•0 citations

New decoding algorithm for a class of simple iterated codes–its application to decoding algorithm for reed‐muller codes

Kin‐ichiroh Tokiwa, Nasao Kasahara, Toshihiko Namekawa

Abstract Recently, for the improvement of reliability of digital communication systems, various kinds of error‐correcting codes are being used. to improve system reliability through the use of more capable error‐correcting codes it is extremely important to simplify the decoder construction and to reduce the decoding delay. This paper studies a decoding algorithm for a class of simple iterated codes (SI codes) constructed by simply repeating I times a codeword (called block) in a given code (called subcode). Moreover, this paper discusses the decoding delay when this decoding algorithm is applied to decoding the Reed‐Muller codes constructed by the superimposing method.

Electronics and Communications in Japan (Part I Communications)•Jan 1, 1984•0 citations

Introduction to the theory of error-correcting codes

Ian F. Blake

Proceedings of the IEEE•Jul 1, 1984•30 citations

Decoding and synchronization of error correcting codes

S. A. Madkour

•Jan 1, 1983•0 citations

LDPC Codes Based on Combinatorial Designs, Graphs, and Superposition

W.E. Ryan, Shu Hwa Lin

Combinatorial designs [1–8] form an important branch in combinatorial mathematics. In the late 1950s and during the 1960s, special classes of combinatorial designs, such as balanced incomplete block designs , were used to construct error correcting codes, especial majority-logic-decodable codes. More recently, combinatorial designs were successfully used to construct structured LDPC codes [9–12]. LDPC codes of practical lengths constructed from several classes of combinatorial designs were shown to perform very well over the binary-input AWGN channel with iterative decoding. Graphs form another important branch in combinatorial mathematics. They were also used to construct error-correcting codes in the early 1960s, but not very successfully. Only a few small classes of majority-logic-decodable codes were constructed. However, since the rediscovery of LDPC codes in the middle of the 1990s, graphs have become an important tool for constructing LDPC codes. One example is to use protographs for constructing iteratively decodable codes as described in Chapters 6 and 8. This chapter presents several methods for constructing LDPC codes based on special types of combinatorial designs and graphs. Balanced Incomplete Block Designs and LDPC Codes Balanced incomplete block designs (BIBDs) form an important class of combinatorial designs. A special subclass of BIBDs can be used to construct RC-constrained matrices or arrays of CPMs from which LDPC codes can be constructed. This section gives a brief description of BIBDs. For an in-depth understanding of this subject, readers are referred to [1–8].

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 17, 2009•1 citation
This study investigates insertion, deletion, and substitution error correcting codes constructed with low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes. The studies for insertion/deletion/substitution error correcting codes are few comparing with substitution error correcting codes. We improve insertion/deletion/substitution error correction capabilities of LDPC codes using slide decoding for modified check matrix. Our evaluation shows that the block error rate of the proposed method is lower than that of the conventional method using marker codes.
Abstract Recently, for the improvement of reliability of digital communication systems, various kinds of error‐correcting codes are being used. to improve system reliability through the use of more capable error‐correcting codes it is extremely important to simplify the decoder construction and to reduce the decoding delay. This paper studies a decoding algorithm for a class of simple iterated codes (SI codes) constructed by simply repeating I times a codeword (called block) in a given code (called subcode). Moreover, this paper discusses the decoding delay when this decoding algorithm is applied to decoding the Reed‐Muller codes constructed by the superimposing method.
Combinatorial designs [1–8] form an important branch in combinatorial mathematics. In the late 1950s and during the 1960s, special classes of combinatorial designs, such as balanced incomplete block designs , were used to construct error correcting codes, especial majority-logic-decodable codes. More recently, combinatorial designs were successfully used to construct structured LDPC codes [9–12]. LDPC codes of practical lengths constructed from several classes of combinatorial designs were shown to perform very well over the binary-input AWGN channel with iterative decoding. Graphs form another important branch in combinatorial mathematics. They were also used to construct error-correcting codes in the early 1960s, but not very successfully. Only a few small classes of majority-logic-decodable codes were constructed. However, since the rediscovery of LDPC codes in the middle of the 1990s, graphs have become an important tool for constructing LDPC codes. One example is to use protographs for constructing iteratively decodable codes as described in Chapters 6 and 8. This chapter presents several methods for constructing LDPC codes based on special types of combinatorial designs and graphs. Balanced Incomplete Block Designs and LDPC Codes Balanced incomplete block designs (BIBDs) form an important class of combinatorial designs. A special subclass of BIBDs can be used to construct RC-constrained matrices or arrays of CPMs from which LDPC codes can be constructed. This section gives a brief description of BIBDs. For an in-depth understanding of this subject, readers are referred to [1–8].