A lifting is a continious map from a system to a compound system introduced by Ohya and Accardi [1], and we can represent several dynam- ical processes by using it.Liftings show the relation between two systems in the compound system clearly, and it is useful to discuss not only the communication process, but also an entanglement of it.In this study we define a quantum mutual entropy using liftings and investigate the property.We show that there exist some cases where the quantum mutual entropy violates the Shannon inequality.
A lifting is a continious map from a system to a compound system introduced by Ohya and Accardi [1], and we can represent several dynam- ical processes by using it.Liftings show the relation between two systems in the compound system clearly, and it is useful to discuss not only the communication process, but also an entanglement of it.In this study we define a quantum mutual entropy using liftings and investigate the property.We show that there exist some cases where the quantum mutual entropy violates the Shannon inequality.
The quantum entropy was introduced by von Neumann around 1932, which describes the amont of information of the quantum state itself. It was extended by Ohya for C*‐systems. The quantum relative entropy was first defined by Umegaki for σ ‐finite von Neumann algebras, which denotes a certain difference between two states. It was extended by Araki and Uhlmann for general von Neumann algebras and *‐algebras, respectively. The development of communication theory is closely connected with study of entropy theory. In order to discuss the commuinication processes, we need at least two systems, such as input and output systems. The signal of the input system is carried through a physical device, which is called a channel. The mathematical representation of the channel is a mapping from the input state space to the output state space. The mutual entropy (information) defined by using the relative entropy between the product state consist of the input state and the output state and the compound state given by the communication process, expresses the amount of information correctly transmitted through the channel from the input system to the output system. In classical communication theory, the mutual entropy was formulated by using the joint probability distribution between the input system and the output system. The (semi‐classical) mutual entropies for classical input and quantum output were defined by several researchers. In fully quantum system, there does not exist the joint probability distribution in general. Instead of the joint probability distribution, Ohya invented the quantum (Ohya) compound state, and he introduced the fully quantum mutual entropy (information), which is called Ohya mutual entropy, for quantum input and output systems, describes the amount of information correctly sent from the quantum input system to the quantum output system through the quantum channel. It was extended by Ohya for general quantum systems. Recently Shor and Bennet et al took the coherent entropy and defined the mutual type entropy to discuss a sort of coding theorem for communication processes.In this paper, we concretely calculate these mutual entropy‐type measures for the attenuation channel in order to assay these abilities.
In classical information theory, the most important theorems are the coding theorems, which were discussed by calculating the mean entropy and the mean mutual entropy defined by the classical dynamical entropy (Kolmogorov–Sinai). The quantum dynamical entropy was first studied by Emch [13] and Connes–Stormer [11]. After that, several approaches for introducing the quantum dynamical entropy were proposed [10,[Formula: see text]3,[Formula: see text]8,[Formula: see text]39,[Formula: see text]15,[Formula: see text]44,[Formula: see text]9,[Formula: see text]27,[Formula: see text]28,[Formula: see text]2,[Formula: see text]19,[Formula: see text]45]. The efficiency of information transmission for the quantum processes is investigated by using the von Neumann entropy [22] and the Ohya mutual entropy [24]. These entropies were extended to S-mixing entropy by Ohya [26,[Formula: see text]27] in general quantum systems. The mean entropy and the mean mutual entropy for the quantum dynamical systems were introduced based on the S-mixing entropy. In this paper, based on research into the dynamical entropy and mean mutual entropy of quantum systems, this study investigates the characteristics of quantum channels that exhibit entanglement, a property unique to quantum systems, and investigates the behaviour of quantum entropy for compound quantum channels by changing the perspective from information transmission between input and output to a new perspective of information transmission from the initial state to the final state.
The quantum entropy introduced by von Neumann around 1932 describes the amount of information of the quantum state itself. It was extended by Ohya for C*-systems before Conne-Narnhoffer-Thirring (CNT) entropy. The quantum relative entropy was first defined by Umegaki for σ-finite von Neumann algebras and it was subsequently extended by Araki and Uhlmann for general von Neumann algebras and *-algebras, respectively. By introducing a new notion, the so-called compound state, in 1983 Ohya succeeded to construct the mutual entropy in a complete quantum mechanical system (i.e., input state, output state and channel are all quantum mechanical) describing the amount of information correctly transmitted through the quantum channel. In this paper, we briefly review Ohya's S-mixing entropy and the quantum mutual entropy for general quantum systems. Based on a concept of structure equivalent, we apply the general framework of quantum communication to the Gaussian communication processes.
The mutual entropy (information) denotes an amount of information transmitted correctly from the input system to the output system through a channel.The (semi-classical) mutual entropies for classical input and quantum output were defined by several researchers.The fully quantum mutual entropy, which is called Ohya mutual entropy, for quantum input and output by using the relative entropy was defined by Ohya in 1983.In this paper, we co mpare with mutual entroΨ -type measures and show some resuls for quantum capacity.
In quantum compound systems, joint (or compound) states usually do not exist [26]. The so-called Ohya compound state was defined by using the von Neumann–Schatten decomposition [23] of an input state and a quantum communication channel. Quantum mutual entropy [10] was introduced by using quantum relative entropy [24] between the Ohya compound state and the trivial (product) compound state on the compound (input and output) system. One of the remarkable results related to state entanglement is the Jamiolkowski isomorphism [5]. In this paper, we use the Jamiolkowski isomorphism for the construction of Ohya compound state and we discuss the existence of a completely positive map between compound entangled states and the Ohya compound states. The efficiency of information transmission is investigated by using the mean entropy and the mean mutual entropy [12, 6] of a connected channel.
In this chapter, we discuss several information measures that are important for quantifying the amount of information and correlations that are present in quantum systems. The first fundamental measure that we introduce is the von Neumann entropy (or simply quantum entropy ). It is the quantum generalization of the Shannon entropy, but it captures both classical and quantum uncertainty in a quantum state.1 The quantum entropy gives meaning to the notion of an information qubit . This notion is different from that of the physical qubit, which is the description of a quantum state of an electron or a photon. The information qubit is the fundamental quantum informational unit of measure, determining how much quantum information is present in a quantum system. The initial definitions here are analogous to the classical definitions of entropy, but we soon discover a radical departure from the intuitive classical notions from the previous chapter: the conditional quantum entropy can be negative for certain quantum states. In the classical world, this negativity simply does not occur, but it takes on a special meaning in quantum information theory. Pure quantum states that are entangled have stronger-than-classical correlations and are examples of states that have negative conditional entropy. The negative of the conditional quantum entropy is so important in quantum information theory that we even have a special name for it: the coherent information. We discover that the coherent information obeys a quantum data-processing inequality, placing it on a firm footing as a particular informational measure of quantum correlations. We then define several other quantum information measures, such as quantum mutual information, that bear similar definitions as in the classical world, but with Shannon entropies replaced with quantum entropies. This replacement may seem to make quantum entropy somewhat trivial on the surface, but a simple calculation reveals that a maximally entangled state on two qubits registers two bits of quantum mutual information (recall that the largest the mutual information can be in the classical world is one bit for the case of two maximally correlated bits). We then discuss several entropy inequalities that play an important role in quantum information processing: the monotonicity of quantum relative entropy, strong subadditivity, the quantum data-processing inequalities, and continuity of quantum entropy.