Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Annals of Physics

Checkerboard-supersolidity in a two-dimensional Bose–Holstein model

Satyaki Kar, Sudhakar Yarlagadda

Published Oct 9, 2016• 5 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.aop.2016.10.001

Related papers

Study of supersolidity in the two-dimensional Hubbard–Holstein model

Amrita Ghosh, Satyaki Kar, Sudhakar Yarlagadda

arXiv:1803.03174•The European Physical Journal B•Sep 1, 2018•6 citations

Fermionic supersolid in the Hubbard model on the checkerboard lattice

Didier Poilblanc, Karlo Penc, Nic Shannon

arXiv:cond-mat/0702367•Feb 15, 2007•0 citations

Supersolidity in the one-dimensional Bose-Hubbard Model

B. Tanatar, Balázs Hetényi

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 15, 2016•0 citations

Supersolid phases in two-dimensional dipolar Bose liquids

Chris R. Laumann, David A. Huse, Roderich Moessner +2 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 15, 2010•0 citations

Dipolar Interactions in a Two-Dimensional Bose Gas: From Superfluid to Supersolid

Haoting Zhen

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Coexistence of long-range orders in a Bose-Holstein model

Satyaki Kar, Sudhakar Yarlagadda

Exploring supersolidity in naturally occurring and artificially designed systems has been and will continue to be an area of immense interest. Here, we study how superfluid and charge-density-wave (CDW) states cooperate or compete in a minimal model for hard-core-bosons (HCBs) coupled locally to optical phonons: a two-dimensional Bose-Holstein model. Our study is restricted to the parameter regimes of strong HCB-phonon coupling and non-adiabaticity. We use Quantum Monte Carlo simulation (involving stochastic-series-expansion technique) to study phase transitions and to investigate whether we have homogeneous or phase-separated coexistence. The effective Hamiltonian involves, besides a nearest-neighbor hopping and a nearest-neighbor repulsion, sizeable double-hopping terms (obtained from second-order perturbation). At densities not far from half-filling, in the parameter regime where the double-hopping terms are non-negligible (negligible) compared to the nearest-neighbor hopping, we get checkerboard-supersolidity (phase separation) with CDW being characterized by ordering wavevector $\vec{Q}=(π,π)$.

arXiv:1501.04528•Jan 19, 2015•0 citations
Exploring supersolidity in naturally occurring and artificially designed systems has been and will continue to be an area of immense interest. Here, we study how superfluid and charge-density-wave (CDW) states cooperate or compete in a minimal model for hard-core-bosons (HCBs) coupled locally to optical phonons: a two-dimensional Bose-Holstein model. Our study is restricted to the parameter regimes of strong HCB-phonon coupling and non-adiabaticity. We use Quantum Monte Carlo simulation (involving stochastic-series-expansion technique) to study phase transitions and to investigate whether we have homogeneous or phase-separated coexistence. The effective Hamiltonian involves, besides a nearest-neighbor hopping and a nearest-neighbor repulsion, sizeable double-hopping terms (obtained from second-order perturbation). At densities not far from half-filling, in the parameter regime where the double-hopping terms are non-negligible (negligible) compared to the nearest-neighbor hopping, we get checkerboard-supersolidity (phase separation) with CDW being characterized by ordering wavevector Q⃗=(π,π)\vec{Q}=(π,π)Q​=(π,π).