Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics World

Free will observations

Alan M Calverd

Published Feb 1, 1990• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Arthur Charlesby opened an interesting debating topic (Letters, January p15). I wonder if I may go some way to closing it?
DOI
10.1088/2058-7058/3/2/21

Related papers

Comment on “The Free Will Theorem”

Roderich Tumulka

arXiv:quant-ph/0611283•Foundations of Physics•Jan 13, 2007•59 citations

Duty versus free will

G. Thompson

A number of matters arise in reply to Arthur Charlesby's letter (January, pl5). Of most importance to physicists: the uncertainties involved in the decay of 60Co can directly and very successfully be ascribed to the uncertainties introduced by the quantum theory. The apparent discrepancy with the scale of Planck's constant, which has the physical dimensions of energy multiplied by time, is completely understandable within the Heisenberg uncertainty principle as being due to the very lack of uncertainty in the mass, and hence energy, of the parent cobalt nucleus.

Physics World•Mar 1, 1990•0 citations

The Free Will Theorem

John Conway, Simon Kochen

arXiv:quant-ph/0604079•Foundations of Physics•Jul 10, 2006•383 citations

Arthur Charlesby—Philosophy and quantum theory

John Little

Radiation Physics and Chemistry•Jan 1, 1998•0 citations

John Bell’s scientific correspondence in the early 1970s

Angela Laurora, Augusto Garuccio

It’s well known the role of John Bell’s article On the Einstein- Podolsky-Rosen paradox, published in 1964, for having aroused a renewed interest toward the research about Quantum Mechanics foundations, though only after some years it was observed the consequences in stimulating and orienting the reflection and the research work of physicists concerned with the topic. In fact, the interest and the participation in the debate expanded following the article by Clauser, Horne, Holt and Shimony in 1969 on the proposal of experimental tests on Bell’s inequality verify, as well as after contributions and discussion at Varenna Conference in 1970 and the out- comes publication of first generation experimental tests conducted between 1972 and 1976. From John Bell’s scientific correspondence 10 unpublished letters are selected and, from November 1970 to January 1980, these docu- ments testify and confirm an increased involvement in the research on Quantum Mechanics foundations and involve, as interlocutors of the corre- spondence, authors such as Max Jammer, Daniel Evrard, Francois Bonsack Chabat, Louis de Broglie, David Bohm and Basil Hiley.

•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations

On the notion of free will in the Free Will Theorem

Klaas Landsman

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics•Nov 24, 2016•7 citations
A number of matters arise in reply to Arthur Charlesby's letter (January, pl5). Of most importance to physicists: the uncertainties involved in the decay of 60Co can directly and very successfully be ascribed to the uncertainties introduced by the quantum theory. The apparent discrepancy with the scale of Planck's constant, which has the physical dimensions of energy multiplied by time, is completely understandable within the Heisenberg uncertainty principle as being due to the very lack of uncertainty in the mass, and hence energy, of the parent cobalt nucleus.
It’s well known the role of John Bell’s article On the Einstein- Podolsky-Rosen paradox, published in 1964, for having aroused a renewed interest toward the research about Quantum Mechanics foundations, though only after some years it was observed the consequences in stimulating and orienting the reflection and the research work of physicists concerned with the topic. In fact, the interest and the participation in the debate expanded following the article by Clauser, Horne, Holt and Shimony in 1969 on the proposal of experimental tests on Bell’s inequality verify, as well as after contributions and discussion at Varenna Conference in 1970 and the out- comes publication of first generation experimental tests conducted between 1972 and 1976. From John Bell’s scientific correspondence 10 unpublished letters are selected and, from November 1970 to January 1980, these docu- ments testify and confirm an increased involvement in the research on Quantum Mechanics foundations and involve, as interlocutors of the corre- spondence, authors such as Max Jammer, Daniel Evrard, Francois Bonsack Chabat, Louis de Broglie, David Bohm and Basil Hiley.