Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

春の分科会予稿集

9a-A-11 RbI:Tlの励起子吸収帯刺激による螢光

暁彦 服部, 正夫 戸村, 仁 西村

Published Apr 6, 1971• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

27a-A-13 RbI中の自己捕獲励起子に対する共鳴ラマン散乱分光

智雄 鈴木, 克己 谷村, 憲昭 伊藤

年会講演予稿集•Sep 12, 1991•0 citations

Comparisons Between Reliability-Based Iterative Min-Sum and Majority-Logic Decoding Algorithms for LDPC Codes

Haiqiang Chen, Kai Zhang, Xiao Ma +1 more

A modified reliability-based iterative majority-logic decoding (MRBI-MLGD) algorithm for two classes of structured LDPC codes is presented based on a recent work by Huang et al. Compared with the original one, the modified algorithm has better performance with slightly increased complexity. Then a reliability-based iterative min-sum decoding (RBI-MSD) algorithm is presented. For the presented RBI-MSD algorithm, reliability-based integer messages are processed and exchanged between variable nodes and check nodes. The main computations include only binary logical operations and integer additions. Different from the conventional min-sum algorithm, the variable nodes pass full messages rather than extrinsic messages to check nodes. This can reduce the memory loads and the computational complexity but with a little (or negligible) performance degradation. Simulation results show that, compared with the (M)RBI-MLGD algorithms, the presented RBI-MSD algorithm achieves better error performance, faster decoding convergence rate and fewer quantization bits with moderate increased computational complexity. Furthermore, the RBI-MSD algorithm is also applicable to decoding random LDPC codes, a distinct difference from the (M)RBI-MLGD algorithms. Finally, we point out that the scaling factors employed in the MRBI-MLGD algorithm and the RBI-MSD algorithm can be optimized using discretized density evolution.

IEEE Transactions on Communications•Jun 28, 2011•23 citations

9a-A-1 2次グリーン関数法によるXYモデル

健 川部

年会予稿集•Sep 20, 1977•0 citations

3a-Z-5 RbIの2光子共鳴励起下における励起子の超高速自己捕獲過程II

智啓 守屋, 英樹 大村, Shinichiro Iwai +1 more

日本物理学会講演概要集. 年会•Mar 15, 1996•0 citations

31a-Pα-15 KI,RbIに於ける1S励起子の自己捕獲過程のピコ秒分光

泰章 舛本, 豊 鵜沼, 繁雄 塩谷

春の分科会予稿集•Mar 15, 1982•0 citations

9a-K-7 確率過程量子化法による遷移確率振幅の計算

一哉 湯浅, Hiromichi Nakazato

日本物理学会講演概要集. 秋の分科会•Sep 13, 1996•0 citations
A modified reliability-based iterative majority-logic decoding (MRBI-MLGD) algorithm for two classes of structured LDPC codes is presented based on a recent work by Huang et al. Compared with the original one, the modified algorithm has better performance with slightly increased complexity. Then a reliability-based iterative min-sum decoding (RBI-MSD) algorithm is presented. For the presented RBI-MSD algorithm, reliability-based integer messages are processed and exchanged between variable nodes and check nodes. The main computations include only binary logical operations and integer additions. Different from the conventional min-sum algorithm, the variable nodes pass full messages rather than extrinsic messages to check nodes. This can reduce the memory loads and the computational complexity but with a little (or negligible) performance degradation. Simulation results show that, compared with the (M)RBI-MLGD algorithms, the presented RBI-MSD algorithm achieves better error performance, faster decoding convergence rate and fewer quantization bits with moderate increased computational complexity. Furthermore, the RBI-MSD algorithm is also applicable to decoding random LDPC codes, a distinct difference from the (M)RBI-MLGD algorithms. Finally, we point out that the scaling factors employed in the MRBI-MLGD algorithm and the RBI-MSD algorithm can be optimized using discretized density evolution.