Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Local equivalence of stabilizer states

Maarten Van den Nest, Jeroen Dehaene, Bart De Moor

Published Jan 1, 2004• 3 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Local equivalence of stabilizer states: a graphical characterisation

Simon Perdrix, Nathan Claudet

•Feb 1, 2025•0 citations

Local unitary versus local Clifford equivalence of stabilizer states

Maarten Van den Nest, Jeroen Dehaene, Bart De Moor

We study the relation between local unitary (LU) equivalence and local Clifford (LC) equivalence of stabilizer states. We introduce a large subclass of stabilizer states, such that every two LU equivalent states in this class are necessarily LC equivalent. Together with earlier results, this shows that LC, LU, and stochastic local operation with classical communication equivalence are the same notions for this class of stabilizer states. Moreover, recognizing whether two given stabilizer states in the present subclass are locally equivalent only requires a polynomial number of operations in the number of qubits.

arXiv:quant-ph/0411115•Physical Review A•Jun 1, 2005•58 citations

Local unitary versus local Clifford equivalence of stabilizer and graph states

Bei Zeng, Hyeyoun Chung, Andrew W. Cross +1 more

The equivalence of stabilizer states under local transformations is of fundamental interest in understanding properties and uses of entanglement. Two stabilizer states are equivalent under the usual stochastic local operations and classical communication criterion if and only if they are equivalent under local unitary (LU) operations. More surprisingly, under certain conditions, two LU-equivalent stabilizer states are also equivalent under local Clifford (LC) operations, as was shown by Van den Nest et al. [Phys. Rev. A 71, 062323 (2005)]. Here, we broaden the class of stabilizer states for which LU equivalence implies LC equivalence $(\mathrm{LU}\ensuremath{\Leftrightarrow}\mathrm{LC})$ to include all stabilizer states represented by graphs with cycles of length neither 3 nor 4. To compare our result with Van den Nest et al.'s, we show that any stabilizer state of distance $\ensuremath{\delta}=2$ is beyond their criterion. We then further prove that $\mathrm{LU}\ensuremath{\Leftrightarrow}\mathrm{LC}$ holds for a more general class of stabilizer states of $\ensuremath{\delta}=2$. We also explicitly construct graphs representing $\ensuremath{\delta}>2$ stabilizer states which are beyond their criterion: we identify all 58 graphs with up to 11 vertices and construct graphs with ${2}^{m}\ensuremath{-}1$ $(m\ensuremath{\geqslant}4)$ vertices using quantum error-correcting codes which have non-Clifford transversal gates.

arXiv:quant-ph/0611214•Physical Review A•Mar 19, 2007•39 citations

Stabilizer Formalism and Its Applications

Keisuke Fujii

SpringerBriefs in mathematical physics•Jan 1, 2015•3 citations

Finite set of invariants to characterize local Clifford equivalence of stabilizer states

Maarten Van den Nest, Jeroen Dehaene, Bart De Moor

The classification of stabilizer states under local Clifford (LC) equivalence is of particular importance in quantum error-correction and measurement-based quantum computation. Two stabilizer states are called LC equivalent if there exists a local Clifford operation which maps the first state to the second. We present a finite set of invariants which completely characterizes the LC equivalence class of any stabilizer state. Our invariants have simple descriptions within the binary framework in which stabilizer states are usually described.

arXiv:quant-ph/0410165•Physical Review A•Jul 20, 2005•19 citations

Local Hamiltonians and Ground States

Bei Zeng, Xie Chen, D. L. Zhou +1 more

Quantum science and technology•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations
We study the relation between local unitary (LU) equivalence and local Clifford (LC) equivalence of stabilizer states. We introduce a large subclass of stabilizer states, such that every two LU equivalent states in this class are necessarily LC equivalent. Together with earlier results, this shows that LC, LU, and stochastic local operation with classical communication equivalence are the same notions for this class of stabilizer states. Moreover, recognizing whether two given stabilizer states in the present subclass are locally equivalent only requires a polynomial number of operations in the number of qubits.
The equivalence of stabilizer states under local transformations is of fundamental interest in understanding properties and uses of entanglement. Two stabilizer states are equivalent under the usual stochastic local operations and classical communication criterion if and only if they are equivalent under local unitary (LU) operations. More surprisingly, under certain conditions, two LU-equivalent stabilizer states are also equivalent under local Clifford (LC) operations, as was shown by Van den Nest et al. [Phys. Rev. A 71, 062323 (2005)]. Here, we broaden the class of stabilizer states for which LU equivalence implies LC equivalence $(\mathrm{LU}\ensuremath{\Leftrightarrow}\mathrm{LC})$ to include all stabilizer states represented by graphs with cycles of length neither 3 nor 4. To compare our result with Van den Nest et al.'s, we show that any stabilizer state of distance $\ensuremath{\delta}=2$ is beyond their criterion. We then further prove that $\mathrm{LU}\ensuremath{\Leftrightarrow}\mathrm{LC}$ holds for a more general class of stabilizer states of $\ensuremath{\delta}=2$. We also explicitly construct graphs representing $\ensuremath{\delta}>2$ stabilizer states which are beyond their criterion: we identify all 58 graphs with up to 11 vertices and construct graphs with ${2}^{m}\ensuremath{-}1$ $(m\ensuremath{\geqslant}4)$ vertices using quantum error-correcting codes which have non-Clifford transversal gates.
The classification of stabilizer states under local Clifford (LC) equivalence is of particular importance in quantum error-correction and measurement-based quantum computation. Two stabilizer states are called LC equivalent if there exists a local Clifford operation which maps the first state to the second. We present a finite set of invariants which completely characterizes the LC equivalence class of any stabilizer state. Our invariants have simple descriptions within the binary framework in which stabilizer states are usually described.