Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security

On Simultaneously Generating Multiple Keys in a Joint Source-Channel Model

Wenwen Tu, Mario Goldenbaum, Lifeng Lai, H. Vincent Poor

Published Sep 21, 2016• 11 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In this paper, the problem of simultaneously generating multiple keys over a cascade of a noiseless channel and a wiretap channel is considered. The problem consists of three legitimate parties (i.e., Alice, Bob, and Carol) and an eavesdropper (Eve), where Alice and Bob wish to agree with Carol on independent secret keys, both of which should be kept secret from Eve. Alice and Bob are connected via a noiseless channel, and Bob is connected with Carol via a wiretap channel, while there is no direct connection between Alice and Carol. To Alice and Carol, Bob acts as a relay. Under this model, a full characterization of the secret-key capacity region is provided for the case in which Eve has no side information. This result shows that there exists a tradeoff between the individual secret-key rates. Then, this result is generalized to the case in which Eve has side information, and the corresponding secret-key capacity region is fully characterized.

DOI
10.1109/tifs.2016.2612172

Related papers

Simultaneously generating multiple keys over a cascade of a noiseless channel and a wiretap channel

Wenwen Tu, Mario Goldenbaum, Lifeng Lai +1 more

In this paper, the problem of simultaneously generating multiple keys over a cascade of a noiseless channel and a wiretap channel is considered. The problem consists of three legitimate parties, i.e., Alice, Bob and Carol, where Alice and Bob wish to agree with Carol on independent secret keys. Alice and Bob are connected via a noiseless channel, and Bob is connected with Carol via a wiretap channel, while there is no direct connection between Alice and Carol. To Alice and Carol, Bob acts as a relay. Under this model, a single-letter characterization of the secret-key capacity region is provided. The result shows that there exists a trade-off between the individual secret-key rates.

IEEE Information Theory Workshop (ITW)•Sep 1, 2016•2 citations

Multiple key generation with restricted public discussion structure

Wenwen Tu, Mario Goldenbaum, Lifeng Lai +1 more

In this paper, the problem of simultaneously generating multiple keys in a model where the key generating parties have restricted access to public discussions is considered. The model consists of four terminals, i.e., Alice, Bob, Carol and Eve. Alice and Bob are connected via a noiseless channel while Bob connects with Carol and Eve via a wiretap channel. There is no direct link connecting Alice with Carol or Eve, and hence Carol and Eve cannot directly access the discussion between Alice and Bob. Alice wishes to share a secret key with Carol while Bob wishes to share another independent secret key with Carol. Under this model, inner and outer bounds on the secret-key capacity region are provided. It is shown that the two bounds match when a certain Markov chain relationship holds.

IEEE Conference on Communications and Network Security•Oct 1, 2016•0 citations

Secrecy via Sources and Channels 1

Vinod M. Prabhakaran, Krishnan Eswaran, Kannan Ramch

Alice and Bob want to share a secret key and to communicate an independent message, both of which they desire to be kept secret from an eavesdropper Eve. We study this problem of secret communication and secret key generation when two resources are available – correlated sources at Alice, Bob, and Eve, and a noisy broadcast channel from Alice to Bob and Eve which is independent of the sources. We are interested in characterizing the fundamental trade-off between the rates of the secret message and secret key. We present an achievable solution and prove its optimality for the parallel channels and sources case when each sub-channel and source component satisfies a degradation order (either in favor of the legitimate receiver or the eavesdropper). This includes the case of jointly Gaussian sources and an additive Gaussian channel, for which the secrecy region is evaluated. I.

•Mar 17, 2011•41 citations

Secrecy via sources and channels — A secret key - Secret message rate tradeoff region

Vinod M. Prabhakaran, Krishnan Eswaran, Kannan Ramchandran

Alice and Bob want to share a secret key and to communicate an independent message, both of which they desire to be kept secret from an eavesdropper Eve. We study this problem of secret communication and secret key generation when two resources are available — correlated sources at Alice, Bob, and Eve, and a noisy broadcast channel from Alice to Bob and Eve. No other resource, in particular, no other channel is available. We are interested in characterizing the fundamental trade-off between the rates of the secret message and secret key. We present an achievable solution based on a separation architecture and prove its optimality under three settings: when Eve’s source and channel are degraded versions of Bob’s, and either Bob’s source or channel is by itself useless in generating a secret key.

IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)•Jul 1, 2008•41 citations

Capacity Region for Covert Secret Key Generation Over Multiple Access Channels

Yingxin Zhang, Lin Zhou, Qiaosheng Eric Zhang

We study covert secret key generation over a two-user multiple access channel with one-way public discussion and derive bounds on the capacity region. Specifically, in this problem, there are three legitimate parties: Alice, Bob and Charlie. The goal is to allow Charlie to generate a secret key with Alice and another secret key with Bob, reliably, secretly and covertly. Reliability ensures that the key generated by Alice and Charlie is the same and the key generated by Bob and Charlie is the same. Secrecy ensures that the secret keys generated are only known to specific legitimate parties. Covertness ensures that the key generation process is undetectable by a warden Willie. As a corollary of our result, we establish bounds on the capacity region of wiretap secret key generation without the covertness constraint and discuss the impact of covertness. Our results generalize the point-to-point result of Tahmasbi and Bloch (TIFS 2020) to the setting of multiterminal communication.

IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Nov 17, 2025•0 citations

Simultaneously generating multiple keys in a four-terminal network

Parisa Babaheidarian, Somayeh Salimi, Mohammad Reza Aref

A source model including four terminals is considered, where three simultaneously generating three types of keys are intended. Terminals 1, 2 and 3 wish to share a common key, the secret key, which should be kept secret from terminal 4 and simultaneously terminals 1 and 2 intend to share a private key with terminal 3, which should be kept secret from each other. Also, all the keys should be concealed from terminal 4 (the external wiretapper). The authors assume that all terminals including the external wiretapper have access to distinct correlated i.i.d. sources; there is also a noiseless public channel with unlimited capacity among the terminals. The authors have investigated the model on two scenarios of key sharing depending on the direction of the public channel. Rate regions of the keys are derived. It is shown that in some special cases the inner and outer bounds of the capacity regions coincide and the capacity regions are derived.

IET Information Security•Sep 10, 2012•3 citations
In this paper, the problem of simultaneously generating multiple keys over a cascade of a noiseless channel and a wiretap channel is considered. The problem consists of three legitimate parties (i.e., Alice, Bob, and Carol) and an eavesdropper (Eve), where Alice and Bob wish to agree with Carol on independent secret keys, both of which should be kept secret from Eve. Alice and Bob are connected via a noiseless channel, and Bob is connected with Carol via a wiretap channel, while there is no direct connection between Alice and Carol. To Alice and Carol, Bob acts as a relay. Under this model, a full characterization of the secret-key capacity region is provided for the case in which Eve has no side information. This result shows that there exists a tradeoff between the individual secret-key rates. Then, this result is generalized to the case in which Eve has side information, and the corresponding secret-key capacity region is fully characterized.
In this paper, the problem of simultaneously generating multiple keys over a cascade of a noiseless channel and a wiretap channel is considered. The problem consists of three legitimate parties, i.e., Alice, Bob and Carol, where Alice and Bob wish to agree with Carol on independent secret keys. Alice and Bob are connected via a noiseless channel, and Bob is connected with Carol via a wiretap channel, while there is no direct connection between Alice and Carol. To Alice and Carol, Bob acts as a relay. Under this model, a single-letter characterization of the secret-key capacity region is provided. The result shows that there exists a trade-off between the individual secret-key rates.
In this paper, the problem of simultaneously generating multiple keys in a model where the key generating parties have restricted access to public discussions is considered. The model consists of four terminals, i.e., Alice, Bob, Carol and Eve. Alice and Bob are connected via a noiseless channel while Bob connects with Carol and Eve via a wiretap channel. There is no direct link connecting Alice with Carol or Eve, and hence Carol and Eve cannot directly access the discussion between Alice and Bob. Alice wishes to share a secret key with Carol while Bob wishes to share another independent secret key with Carol. Under this model, inner and outer bounds on the secret-key capacity region are provided. It is shown that the two bounds match when a certain Markov chain relationship holds.
Alice and Bob want to share a secret key and to communicate an independent message, both of which they desire to be kept secret from an eavesdropper Eve. We study this problem of secret communication and secret key generation when two resources are available – correlated sources at Alice, Bob, and Eve, and a noisy broadcast channel from Alice to Bob and Eve which is independent of the sources. We are interested in characterizing the fundamental trade-off between the rates of the secret message and secret key. We present an achievable solution and prove its optimality for the parallel channels and sources case when each sub-channel and source component satisfies a degradation order (either in favor of the legitimate receiver or the eavesdropper). This includes the case of jointly Gaussian sources and an additive Gaussian channel, for which the secrecy region is evaluated. I.
Alice and Bob want to share a secret key and to communicate an independent message, both of which they desire to be kept secret from an eavesdropper Eve. We study this problem of secret communication and secret key generation when two resources are available — correlated sources at Alice, Bob, and Eve, and a noisy broadcast channel from Alice to Bob and Eve. No other resource, in particular, no other channel is available. We are interested in characterizing the fundamental trade-off between the rates of the secret message and secret key. We present an achievable solution based on a separation architecture and prove its optimality under three settings: when Eve’s source and channel are degraded versions of Bob’s, and either Bob’s source or channel is by itself useless in generating a secret key.
We study covert secret key generation over a two-user multiple access channel with one-way public discussion and derive bounds on the capacity region. Specifically, in this problem, there are three legitimate parties: Alice, Bob and Charlie. The goal is to allow Charlie to generate a secret key with Alice and another secret key with Bob, reliably, secretly and covertly. Reliability ensures that the key generated by Alice and Charlie is the same and the key generated by Bob and Charlie is the same. Secrecy ensures that the secret keys generated are only known to specific legitimate parties. Covertness ensures that the key generation process is undetectable by a warden Willie. As a corollary of our result, we establish bounds on the capacity region of wiretap secret key generation without the covertness constraint and discuss the impact of covertness. Our results generalize the point-to-point result of Tahmasbi and Bloch (TIFS 2020) to the setting of multiterminal communication.
A source model including four terminals is considered, where three simultaneously generating three types of keys are intended. Terminals 1, 2 and 3 wish to share a common key, the secret key, which should be kept secret from terminal 4 and simultaneously terminals 1 and 2 intend to share a private key with terminal 3, which should be kept secret from each other. Also, all the keys should be concealed from terminal 4 (the external wiretapper). The authors assume that all terminals including the external wiretapper have access to distinct correlated i.i.d. sources; there is also a noiseless public channel with unlimited capacity among the terminals. The authors have investigated the model on two scenarios of key sharing depending on the direction of the public channel. Rate regions of the keys are derived. It is shown that in some special cases the inner and outer bounds of the capacity regions coincide and the capacity regions are derived.