Motivated by the importance of contextuality and a work on the robustness of the entanglement of mixed quantum states, the robustness of contextuality (RoC) R C ( e ) of an empirical model e against non-contextual noises was introduced and discussed in Science China Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy (59(4) and 59(9), 2016). Because noises are not always non-contextual, this paper introduces and discusses the generalized robustness of contextuality (GRoC) R g ( e ) of an empirical model e against general noises. It is proven that R g ( e ) = 0 if and only if e is non-contextual. This means that the quantity R g can be used to distinguish contextual empirical models from non-contextual ones. It is also shown that the function R g is convex on the set of all empirical models and continuous on the set of all no-signaling empirical models. For any two empirical models e and f such that the generalized relative robustness of e with respect to f is finite, a fascinating relationship between the GRoCs of e and f is proven, which reads R g ( e ) R g ( f ) ≤ 1 . Lastly, for any n-cycle contextual box e, a relationship between the GRoC R g ( e ) and the extent Δ e of violating the non-contextual inequalities is established.
Motivated by the importance of contextuality and a work on the robustness of the entanglement of mixed quantum states, the robustness of contextuality (RoC) R C ( e ) of an empirical model e against non-contextual noises was introduced and discussed in Science China Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy (59(4) and 59(9), 2016). Because noises are not always non-contextual, this paper introduces and discusses the generalized robustness of contextuality (GRoC) R g ( e ) of an empirical model e against general noises. It is proven that R g ( e ) = 0 if and only if e is non-contextual. This means that the quantity R g can be used to distinguish contextual empirical models from non-contextual ones. It is also shown that the function R g is convex on the set of all empirical models and continuous on the set of all no-signaling empirical models. For any two empirical models e and f such that the generalized relative robustness of e with respect to f is finite, a fascinating relationship between the GRoCs of e and f is proven, which reads R g ( e ) R g ( f ) ≤ 1 . Lastly, for any n-cycle contextual box e, a relationship between the GRoC R g ( e ) and the extent Δ e of violating the non-contextual inequalities is established.
Contextuality is a feature of quantum correlations. It is crucial from a foundational perspective as a non-classical phenomenon, and from an applied perspective as a resource for quantum advantage. It is commonly defined in terms of hidden variables, for which it forces a contradiction with the assumptions of parameter-independence and determinism. The former can be justified by the empirical property of non-signalling or non-disturbance, and the latter by the empirical property of measurement sharpness. However, in realistic experiments neither empirical property holds exactly, which leads to possible objections to contextuality as a form of non-classicality, and potential vulnerabilities for supposed quantum advantages. We introduce measures to quantify both properties, and introduce quantified relaxations of the corresponding assumptions. We prove the continuity of a known measure of contextuality, the contextual fraction, which ensures its robustness to noise. We then bound the extent to which these relaxations can account for contextuality, via corrections terms to the contextual fraction (or to any non-contextuality inequality), culminating in a notion of genuine contextuality, which is robust to experimental imperfections. We then show that our result is general enough to apply or relate to a variety of established results and experimental set-ups. This article is part of the theme issue 'Quantum contextuality, causality and freedom of choice'.
The operational characterization of contextuality is the cornerstone in the development of resource theory of contextuality. Here, we introduce contextual robustness as an operational measure of contextuality on empirical models. We first show that it satisfies all the properties a proper contextual measure should satisfy. Besides, we derive the linear programing of contextual robustness and prove that contextual robustness exactly characterizes the maximal violation of certain types of Bell inequalities. Moreover, we show that contextual robustness quantifies the accessible advantage of empiric models in measurement-based quantum computation, and provide a tighter upper bound on accessible advantage in certain cases.
Classical probabilistic models of (noisy) quantum systems are not only relevant for understanding the non-classical features of quantum mechanics, but they are also useful for determining the possible advantage of using quantum resources for information processing tasks. A common feature of these models is the presence of inaccessible information, as captured by the concept of preparation contextuality: There are ensembles of quantum states described by the same density operator, and hence operationally indistinguishable, and yet in any probabilistic (ontological) model, they should be described by distinct probability distributions. In this work, we quantify the inaccessible information of a model in terms of the maximum distinguishability of probability distributions associated to any pair of ensembles with identical density operators, as quantified by the total variation distance of the distributions. We obtain a family of lower bounds on this maximum distinguishability in terms of experimentally measurable quantities. In the case of an ideal qubit this leads to a lower bound of, approximately, 0.07. These bounds can also be interpreted as a new class of robust preparation non-contextuality inequalities. Our non-contextuality inequalities are phrased in terms of generalizations of max-relative entropy and trace distance for general operational theories, which could be of independent interest. Under sufficiently strong noise any quantum system becomes preparation non-contextual, i.e., can be described by models with zero inaccessible information. Using our non-contextuality inequalities, we show that this can happen only if the noise channel has the average gate fidelity less than or equal to 1/D(1+1/2+...+1/D), where D is the dimension of the Hilbert space.
Contextuality is a non-classical behaviour that can be exhibited by quantum systems. It is increasingly studied for its relationship to quantum-over-classical advantages in informatic tasks. To date, it has largely been studied in discrete variable scenarios, where observables take values in discrete and usually finite sets. Practically, on the other hand, continuous-variable scenarios offer some of the most promising candidates for implementing quantum computations and informatic protocols. Here we set out a framework for treating contextuality in continuous-variable scenarios. It is shown that the Fine--Abramsky--Brandenburger theorem extends to this setting, an important consequence of which is that nonlocality can be viewed as a special case of contextuality, as in the discrete case. The contextual fraction, a quantifiable measure of contextuality that bears a precise relationship to Bell inequality violations and quantum advantages, can also be defined in this setting. It is shown to be a non-increasing monotone with respect to classical operations that include binning to dis cretise data. Finally, we consider how the contextual fraction can be formulated as an infinite linear program, and calculated with increasing accuracy using semi-definite programming approximations.
Given that contextuality and coherence are significant resources in quantum physics, exploring the intricate interplay between these two factors presents a compelling avenue for research. Here, an experiment is presented to investigate the nuanced relationship between contextual robustness and coherence in a scenario of state discrimination. Specifically, two types of noises---depolarizing and dephasing---are introduced in the measurement procedure to assess the robustness of contextuality. By varying the overlap between the states to be discriminated, we explore the variations in contextual robustness across different levels of coherence. Importantly, our findings demonstrate that contextuality can persist under any degree of coherence. Notably, when coherence approaches zero (while remaining nonzero), contextuality can still endure under arbitrary amounts of partial dephasing. These results underscore the pivotal role of coherence in contextual phenomena, offering significant insights into the intricate interplay between coherence and contextuality.
We consider the contextual fraction as a quantitative measure of contextuality of empirical models, i.e., tables of probabilities of measurement outcomes in an experimental scenario. It provides a general way to compare the degree of contextuality across measurement scenarios; it bears a precise relationship to violations of Bell inequalities; its value, and a witnessing inequality, can be computed using linear programing; it is monotonic with respect to the "free" operations of a resource theory for contextuality; and it measures quantifiable advantages in informatic tasks, such as games and a form of measurement-based quantum computing.