Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

QP-PQ, quantum probability and white noise analysis

COUNTER-FACTUAL PHENOMENON IN QUANTUM MECHANICS

Yutaka Shikano

Published Mar 1, 2013• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9789814460026_0039

Related papers

Counterfactuals in Quantum Mechanics

Lev Vaidman A

arXiv:0709.0340•Compendium of Quantum Physics•Jan 1, 2009•15 citations

Counter-factual carving exponentially improves entangled-state fidelity

Joshua Ramette, Josiah Sinclair, Vladan Vuletić

We propose a new method, "counter-factual" carving, that uses the "no-jump" evolution of a probe to generate entangled many-body states of high fidelity. The probe is coupled to a target ensemble of qubits and engineered to exponentially decay at a rate depending on the target collective spin, such that post-selecting on observing no probe decay precisely removes select faster-decaying spin components. When probe and $N$-qubit target interact via a cavity mode of cooperativity $C$, counter-factual carving generates entangled states with infidelities of $e^{-C/N}$, an exponential improvement over previous carving schemes. Counter-factual carving can generate complex entangled states for applications in quantum metrology and quantum computing.

arXiv:2401.11407•Jan 21, 2024•0 citations

Paradoxes in Quantum Mechanics

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations

Counter-Factual Meaningfulness and the Bell and CHSH Inequalities

Travis Norsen

We discuss the role of counter-factual meaningfulness (a weaker cousin of "counter-factual definiteness") as a premise in the derivation of the Bell and CHSH inequalities. The basic question motivating the discussion is this: can the CHSH inequality, unlike the original Bell inequality, be derived without making a hidden-variables (or equivalent counter-factual definiteness) assumption? We answer, somewhat tentatively, in the negative, and suggest that an appropriately-modified version of the EPR argument is needed to rigorously establish that the empirical violation of Bell-type inequalities can only be blamed on the failure, in nature, of local causality.

arXiv:quant-ph/0606084•Jun 9, 2006•2 citations

On a paradox in quantum mechanics

Allen Ginsberg

Synthese•Dec 1, 1984•3 citations

Time series and the meaning of quantum non-locality

Alejandro Andrés Hnilo

Quantum non-locality has become a popular term. Yet, its precise meaning, and even its mere existence, is the subject of controversies. The main cause of the controversies is the never ending discussion on the appropriate definitions of Locality and Realism in the derivation of Bell's inequalities. On the other hand, Louis Sica derived Bell's inequalities from the hypothesis that time series of outcomes observed in one station do not change if the setting in the other (distant) station is changed. The derivation is based on arithmetical properties of time series only; it does not involve the definitions of Locality, Realism and probabilities, and is valid for series of any length. An important consequence is that violation of Bell's inequalities implies the series recorded (at the same time) in one station to be different if the setting in the other station is changed. This result gives precise meaning to the idea of quantum non-locality, and also makes evident why using it for faster than light signaling is impossible (because the difference is between factual and counter-factual series). Finally, it is demonstrated that series of outcomes, even if they violate Bell's inequalities, can be always embedded in a set of factual and counter-factual data that does hold to Bell's inequalities. Loosely speaking, the factual world may be quantum or not, but the union of factual and counter-factual worlds is always classical.

arXiv:2411.02420•Oct 21, 2024•0 citations
We propose a new method, "counter-factual" carving, that uses the "no-jump" evolution of a probe to generate entangled many-body states of high fidelity. The probe is coupled to a target ensemble of qubits and engineered to exponentially decay at a rate depending on the target collective spin, such that post-selecting on observing no probe decay precisely removes select faster-decaying spin components. When probe and NNN-qubit target interact via a cavity mode of cooperativity CCC, counter-factual carving generates entangled states with infidelities of e−C/Ne^{-C/N}e−C/N, an exponential improvement over previous carving schemes. Counter-factual carving can generate complex entangled states for applications in quantum metrology and quantum computing.
We discuss the role of counter-factual meaningfulness (a weaker cousin of "counter-factual definiteness") as a premise in the derivation of the Bell and CHSH inequalities. The basic question motivating the discussion is this: can the CHSH inequality, unlike the original Bell inequality, be derived without making a hidden-variables (or equivalent counter-factual definiteness) assumption? We answer, somewhat tentatively, in the negative, and suggest that an appropriately-modified version of the EPR argument is needed to rigorously establish that the empirical violation of Bell-type inequalities can only be blamed on the failure, in nature, of local causality.
Quantum non-locality has become a popular term. Yet, its precise meaning, and even its mere existence, is the subject of controversies. The main cause of the controversies is the never ending discussion on the appropriate definitions of Locality and Realism in the derivation of Bell's inequalities. On the other hand, Louis Sica derived Bell's inequalities from the hypothesis that time series of outcomes observed in one station do not change if the setting in the other (distant) station is changed. The derivation is based on arithmetical properties of time series only; it does not involve the definitions of Locality, Realism and probabilities, and is valid for series of any length. An important consequence is that violation of Bell's inequalities implies the series recorded (at the same time) in one station to be different if the setting in the other station is changed. This result gives precise meaning to the idea of quantum non-locality, and also makes evident why using it for faster than light signaling is impossible (because the difference is between factual and counter-factual series). Finally, it is demonstrated that series of outcomes, even if they violate Bell's inequalities, can be always embedded in a set of factual and counter-factual data that does hold to Bell's inequalities. Loosely speaking, the factual world may be quantum or not, but the union of factual and counter-factual worlds is always classical.