Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Elsevier eBooks

Collective Energies from Momentum– and Angular Momentum–Projected Determinantal Wavefunctions**This work is supported in part through funds provided by the Atomic Energy Commission under Contract At(30−1) 2098.

Felix M. H. Villars, Nancy Schmeing-Rogerson

Published Jan 1, 1972• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/b978-0-12-508201-3.50025-9

Related papers

Collective energies from momentum- and angular momentum-projected determinantal wavefunctions

Felix M. H. Villars, Nancy Schmeing-Rogerson

Annals of Physics•Apr 1, 1971•48 citations

The Relation Between Classical and Quantum Mechanical Rigid Motion**Work supported in part by the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission and the Higgins Scientific Trust Fund.

G. F. Bertsch

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1972•0 citations

CHAPTER 2. ANGULAR-MOMENTUM PROPERTIES OF WAVEFUNCTIONS

Robert D. Cowan

University of California Press eBooks•Dec 31, 1981•0 citations

Angular Momentum Wavefunctions Constructed by Projector Operators

Per‐Olov Löwdin

Reviews of Modern Physics•Oct 1, 1964•283 citations

On the Power of Entangled Provers: Immunizing games against entanglement

Julia Kempe, Hirotada Kobayashi, Keiji Matsumoto +2 more

We describe two generic ways to make multi-prover classical games resistant against entangled provers. The first uses quantum communication and a quantum verifier, the second adds an additional prover. This leads to several new results on the power of proof systems with entangled provers. We show that NEXP ⊆ QMIP1,s(2, 1) and NEXP ⊆ MIP1,s(3, 1) with soundness s = 1− 2− poly(n) and PSPACE ⊆ MIP1,s(2, 1) with soundness s = 1 − 1/ poly(n), providing the first non-trivial bounds in this setting. Moreover, our results imply that, unless P = NP, the value of entangled prover games cannot be computed by semi-definite programs that are polynomial in the size of the verifier’s system, a method that has been successful for more restricted quantum games. ∗also at CNRS & LRI, Univerite de Paris-Sud, Orsay, France †Partially supported by the European Commission under the Integrated Project Qubit Applications (QAP) funded by the IST directorate as Contract Number 015848 and by an Alon Fellowship of the Israeli Higher Council of Academic Research. ‡Part of this work was completed at Caltech. Supported by the National Science Foundation under Grants PHY-0456720 and CCF-0524828, by EU project QAP, and by NWO VICI project 639-023-302. Part of this research has been funded by the Dutch BSIK/BRICKS project. §Work partly done while at LRI, Univ. de Paris-Sud, Orsay.

•Apr 23, 2007•10 citations

Quantum Simulation of the Agassi Model in Trapped Ions

Pedro Pérez Fernández, José Miguel Arias Carrasco, J. E. García Ramos +1 more

This work was partially supported by the Consejeria de Economia, Conocimiento, Empresas y Universidad de la Junta de Andalucia (Spain) under Groups FQM-160, FQM-177, and FQM-370, by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, FIS2017-88410-P, PGC2018-095113-B-I00, PID2019-104002GB-C21 and PID2019-104002GB-C22, as well as by the European Commission, H2020-INFRAIA-2014-2015 (ENSAR2) and by European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), ref. SOMM17/6105/UGR. Resources supporting this work were provided by the CEAFMC and Universidad de Huelva High Performance Computer (HPC@UHU) funded by ERDF/MINECO project UNHU-15CE-2848

•May 6, 2021•0 citations
We describe two generic ways to make multi-prover classical games resistant against entangled provers. The first uses quantum communication and a quantum verifier, the second adds an additional prover. This leads to several new results on the power of proof systems with entangled provers. We show that NEXP ⊆ QMIP1,s(2, 1) and NEXP ⊆ MIP1,s(3, 1) with soundness s = 1− 2− poly(n) and PSPACE ⊆ MIP1,s(2, 1) with soundness s = 1 − 1/ poly(n), providing the first non-trivial bounds in this setting. Moreover, our results imply that, unless P = NP, the value of entangled prover games cannot be computed by semi-definite programs that are polynomial in the size of the verifier’s system, a method that has been successful for more restricted quantum games. ∗also at CNRS & LRI, Univerite de Paris-Sud, Orsay, France †Partially supported by the European Commission under the Integrated Project Qubit Applications (QAP) funded by the IST directorate as Contract Number 015848 and by an Alon Fellowship of the Israeli Higher Council of Academic Research. ‡Part of this work was completed at Caltech. Supported by the National Science Foundation under Grants PHY-0456720 and CCF-0524828, by EU project QAP, and by NWO VICI project 639-023-302. Part of this research has been funded by the Dutch BSIK/BRICKS project. §Work partly done while at LRI, Univ. de Paris-Sud, Orsay.
This work was partially supported by the Consejeria de Economia, Conocimiento, Empresas y Universidad de la Junta de Andalucia (Spain) under Groups FQM-160, FQM-177, and FQM-370, by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, FIS2017-88410-P, PGC2018-095113-B-I00, PID2019-104002GB-C21 and PID2019-104002GB-C22, as well as by the European Commission, H2020-INFRAIA-2014-2015 (ENSAR2) and by European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), ref. SOMM17/6105/UGR. Resources supporting this work were provided by the CEAFMC and Universidad de Huelva High Performance Computer (HPC@UHU) funded by ERDF/MINECO project UNHU-15CE-2848