Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks

QUANTUM INTERFEROMETERS, EULER ANGLES, UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS OF SU(2)

Claudio Parmeggiani

Published Aug 14, 2013• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9789814518550_0092

Related papers

UNITARY OPERATORS IN QUANTUM THEORY

IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS eBooks•Sep 1, 1995•0 citations

SU(2) and SU(1,1) interferometers

Bernard Yurke, S. L. McCall, John R. Klauder

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1988•35 citations

SU(2) COHERENT STATE PATH INTEGRALS LABELED BY A FULL SET OF EULER ANGLES: BASIC FORMULATION

MASAO MATSUMOTO

We develop a basic formulation of the spin (SU(2)) coherent state path integrals based not on the conventional highest or lowest weight vectors but on arbitrary fiducial vectors. The coherent states, being defined on a 3-sphere, are specified by a full set of Euler angles. They are generally considered as states without classical analogues. The overcompleteness relation holds for the states, by which we obtain the time evolution of general systems in terms of the path integral representation; the resultant Lagrangian in the action has a monopole-type term à la Balachandran et al. as well as some additional terms, both of which depend on fiducial vectors in a simple way. The process of the discrete path integrals to the continuous ones is clarified. Complex variable forms of the states and path integrals are also obtained. During the course of all steps, we emphasize the analogies and correspondences to the general canonical coherent states and path integrals that we proposed some time ago. In this paper we concentrate on the basic formulation. The physical applications as well as criteria in choosing fiducial vectors for real Lagrangians, in relation to fictitious monopoles and geometric phases, will be treated in subsequent papers separately.

arXiv:1201.5258•International Journal of Modern Physics B•Sep 27, 2012•5 citations

ATOMIC MULTIPLE BEAM INTERFEROMETERS AND ATOMIC POLARIZED BEAM INTERFEROMETERS AMONG TWO EXCITED STATES

Atsuo Morinaga, Shinya Yanagimachi, T. Aoki

Symposium on Frequency Standards and Metrology•May 1, 2002•0 citations

Interferometry Concept Within the SU(1,1) Framework

Daniel Linnemann

Springer theses•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations

Quantum mechanics on space with SU(2) fuzziness

Amir H. Fatollahi, Ahmad Shariati, Mohammad Khorrami

Quantum mechanics of models is considered which are constructed in spaces with Lie algebra type commutation relations between spatial coordinates. The case is specialized to that of the group SU(2), for which the formulation of the problem via the Euler parameterization is also presented. SU(2)-invariant systems are discussed, and the corresponding eigenvalue problem for the Hamiltonian is reduced to an ordinary differential equation, as it is the case with such models on commutative spaces.

•Nov 26, 2012•9 citations
We develop a basic formulation of the spin (SU(2)) coherent state path integrals based not on the conventional highest or lowest weight vectors but on arbitrary fiducial vectors. The coherent states, being defined on a 3-sphere, are specified by a full set of Euler angles. They are generally considered as states without classical analogues. The overcompleteness relation holds for the states, by which we obtain the time evolution of general systems in terms of the path integral representation; the resultant Lagrangian in the action has a monopole-type term à la Balachandran et al. as well as some additional terms, both of which depend on fiducial vectors in a simple way. The process of the discrete path integrals to the continuous ones is clarified. Complex variable forms of the states and path integrals are also obtained. During the course of all steps, we emphasize the analogies and correspondences to the general canonical coherent states and path integrals that we proposed some time ago. In this paper we concentrate on the basic formulation. The physical applications as well as criteria in choosing fiducial vectors for real Lagrangians, in relation to fictitious monopoles and geometric phases, will be treated in subsequent papers separately.