With the exception of Chapter 1, up to this point we have considered cavityless optical systems. With this chapter, instead, we start focussing on the case that the atomic medium is located in an optical cavity. We describe in detail the case of a unidirectional ring resonator, the boundary condition which characterizes it and the relations between its output fields and the intracavity field (Sections 8.1–8.3). We discuss the transmission of an empty cavity (Section 8.4) and of a cavity that contains a linear medium (Section 8.5). Optical cavities An optical cavity or optical resonator is formed by at least two mirrors, appropriately arranged in such a way that the radiation beam follows a closed path. The beam splitters allow the radiation to escape from the cavity (output) and allow one to inject radiation into the cavity (input). In order to confine the radiation transversally with respect to the direction of propagation, the mirrors are usually spherical (see Fig. 1.2). The case of cavities with spherical mirrors will be described in Part III of this volume. On the other hand, an analytical treatment of the problems is possible only within the plane-wave approximation which we will use in the remainder of Part I and in Part II. In accord with this, we assume here that the mirrors are planar. The two most common types of optical resonator are the Fabry–Perot cavity and the ring cavity . The planar Fabry–Perot cavity consists in two beam splitters in a parallel configuration as shown in Fig. 8.1. Within the cavity there are two counterpropagating fields, E F propagating in the forward direction and E B propagating in the backward direction with respect to the input field E I . Because we have derived the Maxwell–Bloch equations for the unidirectional configuration, in this and the following chapters we focus on the case of a ring cavity, which allows unidirectionality. The Fabry–Perot case will be considered in Chapter 14.
With the exception of Chapter 1, up to this point we have considered cavityless optical systems. With this chapter, instead, we start focussing on the case that the atomic medium is located in an optical cavity. We describe in detail the case of a unidirectional ring resonator, the boundary condition which characterizes it and the relations between its output fields and the intracavity field (Sections 8.1–8.3). We discuss the transmission of an empty cavity (Section 8.4) and of a cavity that contains a linear medium (Section 8.5). Optical cavities An optical cavity or optical resonator is formed by at least two mirrors, appropriately arranged in such a way that the radiation beam follows a closed path. The beam splitters allow the radiation to escape from the cavity (output) and allow one to inject radiation into the cavity (input). In order to confine the radiation transversally with respect to the direction of propagation, the mirrors are usually spherical (see Fig. 1.2). The case of cavities with spherical mirrors will be described in Part III of this volume. On the other hand, an analytical treatment of the problems is possible only within the plane-wave approximation which we will use in the remainder of Part I and in Part II. In accord with this, we assume here that the mirrors are planar. The two most common types of optical resonator are the Fabry–Perot cavity and the ring cavity . The planar Fabry–Perot cavity consists in two beam splitters in a parallel configuration as shown in Fig. 8.1. Within the cavity there are two counterpropagating fields, E F propagating in the forward direction and E B propagating in the backward direction with respect to the input field E I . Because we have derived the Maxwell–Bloch equations for the unidirectional configuration, in this and the following chapters we focus on the case of a ring cavity, which allows unidirectionality. The Fabry–Perot case will be considered in Chapter 14.
In Chapters 8–13 we always assumed that the nonlinear medium is contained in a unidirectional ring cavity. The case of a Fabry–Perot cavity (Fig. 8.1) is substantially more complex because the interference of the two counterpropagating fields gives rise to a standing-wave pattern that modulates the population difference and the atomic polarization to form gratings with a spatial frequency equal to the inverse of the half-wavelength and its harmonics. Therefore the atomic variables exhibit, in addition to the slow spatial variation which characterizes the envelopes, also a fast spatial variation on the wavelength scale, and the coexistence of these two spatial scales poses a highly nontrivial problem that must be treated with care. In Chapters 9 and 11 we solved exactly the Maxwell–Bloch equations with the ring-cavity boundary conditions for both the active and the passive configuration. Exact solutions of this kind have been obtained also for the equations and boundary conditions of a Fabry–Perot cavity [117–119]. However, for the sake of simplicity we will pass directly to models that are valid in the low-transmission approximation. Again for the sake of simplicity, in this chapter we assume that n B = 1, so that the light velocity in the empty part of the cavity is the same as that in the atomic sample. By following the same line of reasoning as that which we pursued in Chapter 12, in Section 14.1 we introduce a spatial transformation of the electric-field envelopes, which leads to boundary conditions without parameters, while the parameters present in the boundary conditions of the original variables appear in the envelope equations. As in the ring-cavity case, this approach allows one to introduce the cavity modes in a natural way, and to derive a set of modal equations coupled to the equations for the atomic variables. Sets of equations of this kind are common in the laser literature, but are not derived from the true boundary conditions for the cavity.
In the previous chapters we considered the Maxwell–Bloch equations with the boundary condition appropriate for a unidirectional ring cavity and calculated the stationary solutions for laser and optical bistability, respectively. Next, we showed that the exact stationary solutions simplify appreciably in the low-transmission limit. In this chapter we want, first of all, to apply the low-transmission approximation on the dynamical equations directly, beyond the stationary case. We start from the Maxwell–Bloch equations (4.35)–(4.37) and the boundary condition (8.36). The latter is complex and includes the retardation Δ t and some parameters such as the transmissivity and reflectivity coefficients T and R , the input field y and the cavity detuning δ 0 . We introduce a transformation of the coordinates z and t and a transformation of the variables F and P [121–123]. As a result, the boundary condition reduces to a simple periodic boundary condition, and the electric-field equation incorporates the parameters which previously appeared in the boundary condition. The virtue of the periodic boundary condition is that it allows one to expand the electric field in terms of modal amplitudes and to recast the field equation in the form of a set of time-evolution equations for the modal amplitudes. All of this is shown in Section 12.1. In Section 12.2 we apply the low-transmission approximation and the Maxwell–Bloch equations assume a form that is a generalization of a set of equations commonly used in the literature to describe the ring laser [124]. Together with the Bloch equations for the atomic variables, the modal equations provide a model that lends itself ideally to a numerical resolution of the equations. In Section 12.3 we show that, if we assume that only the resonant cavity mode is active, this model reduces to a simple single-mode model consisting in three coupled ordinary differential equations, which will be analyzed in Part II of this book. Next, in the same section we derive the single-mode model in a more direct way, without passing through the multimodal equations.
In Chapter 9 we discussed the case of a nonlinear cavity containing an active medium. In this framework, the outstanding phenomenon which arises is laser emission, and we calculated the stationary solutions for the ring laser. In this chapter, instead, we turn our attention to the passive nonlinear cavity and in this framework the outstanding phenomenon is optical bistability , i.e. the existence of two distinct stable stationary states that coexist for the same fixed values of the parameters in play. This phenomenon can arise also in the case of an active system contained in a cavity, as we have already noted in Section 9.1 and as we will discuss further in connection with the laser with injected signal, but it became popular from the studies of nonlinear passive optical cavities in the 1970s and 1980s. In contrast to the laser case, in the passive configuration we use an input coherent field, which is injected into the cavity. We discussed this case in Chapter 8 and derived a general equation for the transmission of the cavity (Eq. (8.23)), which we used for an empty cavity and for a linear cavity in Sections 8.4 and 8.5, respectively. In this chapter we will discuss the full nonlinear configuration. It is customary to identify two extreme cases of optical bistability called absorptive optical bistability and dispersive or refractive optical bistability . In both cases an essential ingredient to obtain the bistable behavior is the feedback action exerted by the mirrors of the cavity. In the purely absorptive configuration, in which there is exact resonance among the frequencies of the input field, of the atoms and of the cavity, the other essential ingredient is the saturable nonlinearity of the absorption. In the dispersive case, instead, the main feature is the nonlinearity of the refractive index. These two cases will be illustrated in Sections 11.1 and 11.2, respectively, both “exactly” and in the low-transmission limit.
In Chapters 27 and 28 we discussed the topic of optical spatial pattern formation in planar cavities. In this chapter, instead, we consider the case of ring cavities with spherical mirrors, on the basis of the discussion of transverse modes in Chapter 26. In the first section we derive, first of all, a set of modal equations to be coupled with the atomic equations, with a configuration similar to that of the modal equations of Chapter 12, with the difference that now transverse modes are included in addition to longitudinal modes. This provides an extremely complex context, and therefore in the following we focus on the case of quasi-planar cavities, in which it is possible, by introducing the low-transmission and single-longitudinal-mode approximations, to derive a single-longitudinal-mode model that represents, in the framework of cavities with spherical mirrors, the counterpart of the single-longitudinal-mode model for planar cavities discussed in Chapter 27. In Section 29.2 we consider the simplest configuration, in which only the fundamental Gaussian transverse mode is assumed to have negligible losses, so that it is possible to consider a single-mode model that includes only the Gaussian mode. This is precisely the model considered in Section 24.3.1 for the comparison with experimental data concerning the single-mode instability of optical bistability. We calculate the stationary curve, and in the laser case we demonstrate the validity of the mode-pulling formula also in this configuration. In the following section we consider, instead, the general case in which several transverse modes of a laser are involved and demonstrate that the modal equations admit multimodal stationary intensity states, a configuration that is not possible in the case of longitudinal modes, at least in the low-transmission approximation. In this phenomenon, which we call cooperative frequency locking , the modes agree a common oscillation frequency that is given by the average of the (mode-pulled) modal frequencies, with weights given by the modal intensities. Numerical and experimental evidence of cooperative frequency locking is provided.
In this chapter we outline the general scenario for optical temporal instabilities, starting from the standard Maxwell–Bloch equations. With the exception of Section 22.7, in Part II we will always consider the ring-cavity configuration because only in the case of the ultrathin-medium case considered in Section 22.7 is the treatment of instabilities in Fabry–Perot cavities not substantially more complicated than that in the ring-cavity configuration. Some authors have introduced special approaches in order to study temporal optical instabilities, exploiting the concepts of gain and of dispersion, which are natural in optical systems and therefore help our intuition. In particular, a hint of the mechanism that produces instabilities in optical systems is offered by the so-called “weak-sideband” approach or “gain-feedback approach” [245–249], whose validity can be justified rigorously with the help of the linear-stability analysis [250]. The central point of this method is the response of the system to a weak probe passing through a collection of two-level atoms driven by a strong field [251–253]. If the strong signal with carrier frequency ω 0 saturates the medium, we can find regions of the frequency axis, which are far removed from the carrier frequency of the signal, where the weak probe can experience gain instead of absorption even if the medium has no population inversion. In this book we follow the approach of [250], which is rigorously rooted in the linear- stability analysis and, in addition, establishes a general, useful and, in a sense, surprising connection between single-mode and multimode instabilities. We classify as single-mode a temporal instability that involves the resonant mode only, and classify as multimode a temporal instability that involves only off-resonance cavity modes. The discussion in this chapter is mainly focussed on this connection. In Section 20.1 the multimodal equations derived in Section 12.2 are reformulated by introducing a modal expansion also for the atomic variables. In this way one obtains a complex hierarchy of equations that couple the modal amplitudes for the field and for the atomic variables.
Abstract We formulate the dynamics of nonlinear optical Fabry–Perot (FB) cavities in terms of a model in which only one of the two counter-propagating electric field envelopes appear. Thus, the model is simpler than the standard ones but still exact. The field envelope which propagates in the opposite direction is expressed in a very simple way in terms of the envelope that appears in the model. Thus we generalize in the simplest way to the FB case the set of Maxwell–Bloch equations for the ring cavity. The boundary condition for the field envelope that appears in the model is a simple periodicity condition. This feature allows for expanding the variables of the model in terms of traveling waves instead of standing waves as it is customary, which implies noteworthy simplifications in the calculations. On the basis of the modal equations which arise from the model, we discuss the adiabatic elimination of the atomic variables and of the atomic polarization only.