Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

World Scientific series in 20th century physics

Paper 1.1: J.A. Armstrong, N. Bloembergen, J. Ducuing and P.S. Pershan , “Interactions between light waves in a nonlinear dielectric,” Phys. Rev. 127, 1918–1939, 1962.

Published Sep 1, 1996• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9789812795793_0001

Related papers

Paper 1.7: N. Bloembergen, “Nonlinear optics and spectroscopy,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 685–695, 1982.

World Scientific series in 20th century physics•Sep 1, 1996•0 citations

Classical nonlinear optics

P. D. Drummond, Mark S. Hillery

Before discussing nonlinear optics with quantized fields, it is useful to have a look at what happens with classical electromagnetic fields in nonlinear dielectric media. The theory of nonlinear optics was originally developed using classical fields by Armstrong, Bloembergen, Ducuing and Pershan in 1962, stimulated by an experiment by Franken, Hill, Peters and Weinreich in which a second harmonic of a laser field was produced by shining the laser into a crystal. This classical theory is sufficient for many applications. For the most part, quantized fields were introduced later, although a quantum theory for the parametric amplifier, a nonlinear device in which three modes are coupled, was developed by Louisell, Yariv and Siegman as early as 1961. In any case, a study of the classical theory will give us an idea of some of the effects to look for when we formulate the more complicated quantum theory. What we will present here is a very short introduction to the subject. Our intent is to use the classical theory to present some of the basic concepts and methods of nonlinear optics. Further information can be found in the list of additional reading at the end of the chapter. The discussion here is based primarily on the presentations in the books by N. Bloembergen and by R. W. Boyd. Linear polarizability We wish to survey some of the effects caused by the linear polarizability of a dielectric medium. When an electric field E ( r , t ) is applied to a dielectric medium, a polarization, that is, a dipole moment per unit volume, is created in the medium.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 27, 2014•0 citations

Paper 2.3: R.K. Chang, J. Ducuing and N. Bloembergen, “Relative phase measurement, between fundamental and second harmonic light,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 6–8, (1965).

World Scientific series in 20th century physics•Sep 1, 1996•1 citation

Study of some coherent processes involving nonlinear interactions of light with matter

Aurangzeb Khurram Hafiz

•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations

Selected papers on photon statistics and coherence in nonlinear optics

Jan Peřina, Brian J. Thompson

SPIE Optical Engineering Press eBooks•Jan 1, 1991•0 citations

Spectra of second harmonic generation and sum frequency generation for multimode fields

Jerzy S. Krasiński, Donald F. Heller, Jay R. Ackerhalt +1 more

The theory of three wave mixing was formulated in a classic paper by Armstrong, Bloembergen, Ducuing, and Pershan over 25 years ago.1 A theoretical description of three wave mixing for multimode time-dependent input fields (as opposed to cw single frequency time independent input fields) has recently been presented.2 Analytic solutions were developed for die time-dependent intensities of the output fields. These solutions differ dramatically from those for single-mode fields. New frequencies in the sum-frequency output spectrum and in the input-field output spectrum are created and grow in magnitude as the input intensities are increased. The output spectrum broadens under conditions of strong nonlinear coupling, ultimately reaching the phasematched bandwidth limit. Here, we review the results presented in Ref. 2 for sum frequency generation (SFG) and explicidy compare these results with those for second harmonic generation (SHG). We show that SHG cannot be described as a limit of the SFG formalism for multimode fields. The SFG formulation for the interaction of photons close to frequency ω1 with photons close to frequency ω2 producing photons close to frequency ω 3= ω 1+ ω 2 does not allow ω1(ω2) photons to interact with each other to produce photons close to frequency 2ω1(2ω2). This self interaction is crucial for SHG and must be incorporated. Therefore, a separate formulation is used to describe SHG with multimode input fields.

Nonlinear Dynamics in Optical Systems•Jan 1, 1990•0 citations
Before discussing nonlinear optics with quantized fields, it is useful to have a look at what happens with classical electromagnetic fields in nonlinear dielectric media. The theory of nonlinear optics was originally developed using classical fields by Armstrong, Bloembergen, Ducuing and Pershan in 1962, stimulated by an experiment by Franken, Hill, Peters and Weinreich in which a second harmonic of a laser field was produced by shining the laser into a crystal. This classical theory is sufficient for many applications. For the most part, quantized fields were introduced later, although a quantum theory for the parametric amplifier, a nonlinear device in which three modes are coupled, was developed by Louisell, Yariv and Siegman as early as 1961. In any case, a study of the classical theory will give us an idea of some of the effects to look for when we formulate the more complicated quantum theory. What we will present here is a very short introduction to the subject. Our intent is to use the classical theory to present some of the basic concepts and methods of nonlinear optics. Further information can be found in the list of additional reading at the end of the chapter. The discussion here is based primarily on the presentations in the books by N. Bloembergen and by R. W. Boyd. Linear polarizability We wish to survey some of the effects caused by the linear polarizability of a dielectric medium. When an electric field E ( r , t ) is applied to a dielectric medium, a polarization, that is, a dipole moment per unit volume, is created in the medium.
The theory of three wave mixing was formulated in a classic paper by Armstrong, Bloembergen, Ducuing, and Pershan over 25 years ago.1 A theoretical description of three wave mixing for multimode time-dependent input fields (as opposed to cw single frequency time independent input fields) has recently been presented.2 Analytic solutions were developed for die time-dependent intensities of the output fields. These solutions differ dramatically from those for single-mode fields. New frequencies in the sum-frequency output spectrum and in the input-field output spectrum are created and grow in magnitude as the input intensities are increased. The output spectrum broadens under conditions of strong nonlinear coupling, ultimately reaching the phasematched bandwidth limit. Here, we review the results presented in Ref. 2 for sum frequency generation (SFG) and explicidy compare these results with those for second harmonic generation (SHG). We show that SHG cannot be described as a limit of the SFG formalism for multimode fields. The SFG formulation for the interaction of photons close to frequency ω1 with photons close to frequency ω2 producing photons close to frequency ω 3= ω 1+ ω 2 does not allow ω1(ω2) photons to interact with each other to produce photons close to frequency 2ω1(2ω2). This self interaction is crucial for SHG and must be incorporated. Therefore, a separate formulation is used to describe SHG with multimode input fields.