Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Classical and Quantum Interference and Coherence

Published Sep 12, 2005• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/0-387-25835-3_1

Related papers

Classical and Quantum Interference

Z. Ficek, Mohamed Ridza Wahiddin

Optical interference is regarded as a classical phenomenon and is usually completely described in classical terms, in which optical fields are represented by classical waves. Does it mean that optical interference, which is fundamentally ascribable to the phenomenon of a superposition of wave amplitudes, cannot be applied to test quantum phenomena? The superposition principle is at the heart of quantum physics and one could expect that it should distinguish the quantum nature of light from thewave nature. Our experience based on extensive theoretical analysis and experimental observations shows that classical and quantum theories of optical interference readily explain the presence of an interference pattern resulting from the first-order coherence. However, there are interference effects involving the higher order (second-order) coherence that distinguish the quantum (photon) nature of light from the wave nature. Quantum interference has recently returned to prominence because of its utility in manipulating spontaneous emission and other radiative properties of atomic systems. In this chapter, we present elementary concepts and definitions of both the classical and quantum theory of optical interference and discuss similarities and differences between these two approaches [80].

•Apr 19, 2016•0 citations

Quantum Interference and Coherence

Z. Ficek, S. Swain, William T. Rhodes +9 more

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2005•107 citations

Quantum interference and coherence: Theory and experiments

Z. Ficek, S. Swain

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2005•263 citations

Interplay between coherent and incoherent decay processes in chaotic systems: The role of quantum interference

Camilo Moreno, Juan Diego Urbina

The population decay due to a small opening in an otherwise closed cavity supporting chaotic classical dynamics displays a quantum correction on top of the classical exponential form, a pure manifestation of quantum coherence that acquires a universal form and can be explained by path interference. Being coherent, such enhancement is prone to decoherence effects due to the coupling of the system to an external environment. We study this interplay between incoherent and coherent quantum corrections to decay by evaluating, within a Caldeira-Leggett scenario, off-diagonal contributions to the decoherence functional coming from pairs of correlated classical paths in the time regime where dissipative effects are neglected and decoherence does not affect the classical dynamics, but quantum interference must be accounted for. We find that the competing effects of interference and decoherence lead to a universal nonmonotonic form for the survival probability depending only on the coupling strength and macroscopic parameters of the cavity.

arXiv:2010.03945•Physical review. E•May 3, 2021•0 citations

Quantum superposition, coherence, and interference

Garay, Linda Bertel

•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

Classical and nonclassical interference

Krzysztof Wódkiewicz, G. H. Herling

The relation between quantum interference and classical interference is discussed in terms of the Wigner function and an analogous classical expression. For two displaced coherent states and two displaced electric-field Gaussian pulses, both the quantum-mechanical and classical Wigner functions exhibit oscillatory behavior. Classical analogs of squeezing, photon-number oscillation, and the $Q$ function are presented.

Physical Review A•Feb 1, 1998•21 citations
Optical interference is regarded as a classical phenomenon and is usually completely described in classical terms, in which optical fields are represented by classical waves. Does it mean that optical interference, which is fundamentally ascribable to the phenomenon of a superposition of wave amplitudes, cannot be applied to test quantum phenomena? The superposition principle is at the heart of quantum physics and one could expect that it should distinguish the quantum nature of light from thewave nature. Our experience based on extensive theoretical analysis and experimental observations shows that classical and quantum theories of optical interference readily explain the presence of an interference pattern resulting from the first-order coherence. However, there are interference effects involving the higher order (second-order) coherence that distinguish the quantum (photon) nature of light from the wave nature. Quantum interference has recently returned to prominence because of its utility in manipulating spontaneous emission and other radiative properties of atomic systems. In this chapter, we present elementary concepts and definitions of both the classical and quantum theory of optical interference and discuss similarities and differences between these two approaches [80].
The population decay due to a small opening in an otherwise closed cavity supporting chaotic classical dynamics displays a quantum correction on top of the classical exponential form, a pure manifestation of quantum coherence that acquires a universal form and can be explained by path interference. Being coherent, such enhancement is prone to decoherence effects due to the coupling of the system to an external environment. We study this interplay between incoherent and coherent quantum corrections to decay by evaluating, within a Caldeira-Leggett scenario, off-diagonal contributions to the decoherence functional coming from pairs of correlated classical paths in the time regime where dissipative effects are neglected and decoherence does not affect the classical dynamics, but quantum interference must be accounted for. We find that the competing effects of interference and decoherence lead to a universal nonmonotonic form for the survival probability depending only on the coupling strength and macroscopic parameters of the cavity.
The relation between quantum interference and classical interference is discussed in terms of the Wigner function and an analogous classical expression. For two displaced coherent states and two displaced electric-field Gaussian pulses, both the quantum-mechanical and classical Wigner functions exhibit oscillatory behavior. Classical analogs of squeezing, photon-number oscillation, and the QQQ function are presented.