Chapter One. Clifford and Heisenberg algebras

Hicham Banouh, Anouar Ben Mabrouk

In the present work, we are concerned with the development of a new uncertainty principle based on the wavelet transform in the Clifford analysis/algebra framework. We precisely derive a sharp Heisenberg-type uncertainty principle for the continuous Clifford wavelet transform.

David Finkelstein

M.C.B. Fernandes, Basil J. Hiley

In this paper we discuss a simplified approach to the symplectic Clifford algebra, the symplectic Clifford group and the symplectic spinor by first extending the Heisenberg algebra. We do this by adding a new idempotent element to the algebra. It turns out that this element is the projection operator onto the Dirac standard ket. When this algebra is transformed into the Fock algebra, the corresponding idempotent is the projector onto the vacuum. These additional elements give a very simple way to write down expressions for symplectic spinors as elements of the symplectic Clifford algebra. When this algebra structure is applied to an optical system we find a new way to understand the Gouy effect. It is seen to arise from the covering group, which in this case is the symplectic Clifford group, also known as the metaplectic group. We relate our approach to that of Simon and Mukunda who have shown the relation of the Gouy phase to the Berry phase.

A. K. Kwaśniewski, W. Bajguz, I. Jaroszewski

Thalanayar S. Santhanam

William Michael Kallfelz

I summarize Silberstein, et. al’s (2006) discussion of the derivation of the Heisenberg commutators, whose work is based on Kaiser (1981, 1990) and Bohr, et. al. (1995, 2004a,b). I argue that Bohr and Kaiser’s treatment is not geometric enough, as it still relies on some unexplained residual notions concerning the unitary representation of transformations in a Hilbert space. This calls for a more consistent characterization of the role of i than standard QM can offer. I summarize David Hestenes’ (1985,1986) major claims concerning the essential role Clifford algebras play in such a fundamental characterization of i, and I present a Clifford- algebraic derivation of the Heisenberg commutation relations (taken from Finkelstein, et. al. (2001)). I argue that their derivation exhibits a more fundamentally geometrical approach, which unifies geometric and ontological content. I also point out how some of Finkelstein’s ontological notions of “chronon dynamics” can give a plausible explanatory account of RBW’s “geometric relations.”