Deutsch's algorithm and Grover's quantum search are theoretically interesting, but it is not obvious that these two algorithms are actually useful for anything important. We next consider a selection of more advanced algorithms, several of which may have real-life applications. Some of these will be too complicated to explain fully, and their properties will only be sketched briefly. The Deutsch–Jozsa algorithm Deutsch's algorithm is simple, but important, as it shows that a quantum algorithm can find a property of an unknown function (its parity) with a smaller number of queries than any possible classical algorithm (one rather than two). For this reason we can say that quantum computing is more efficient than classical computing within the oracle model of function evaluation. (It is widely believed that quantum computing is more efficient than classical computing in general, but this is a surprisingly hard thing to prove.) The simplicity of the algorithm is also an advantage, as it can be implemented on very primitive quantum computers. Beyond this, however, Deutsch's algorithm is also important as the simplest member of a large family of quantum algorithms, including most notably Shor's quantum factoring algorithm. The second simplest algorithm in the family is the Deutsch–Jozsa algorithm, which solves a very closely related problem. Consider an unknown binary function with n input bits, giving N = 2 n possible inputs, and a single output bit.
Deutsch's algorithm and Grover's quantum search are theoretically interesting, but it is not obvious that these two algorithms are actually useful for anything important. We next consider a selection of more advanced algorithms, several of which may have real-life applications. Some of these will be too complicated to explain fully, and their properties will only be sketched briefly. The Deutsch–Jozsa algorithm Deutsch's algorithm is simple, but important, as it shows that a quantum algorithm can find a property of an unknown function (its parity) with a smaller number of queries than any possible classical algorithm (one rather than two). For this reason we can say that quantum computing is more efficient than classical computing within the oracle model of function evaluation. (It is widely believed that quantum computing is more efficient than classical computing in general, but this is a surprisingly hard thing to prove.) The simplicity of the algorithm is also an advantage, as it can be implemented on very primitive quantum computers. Beyond this, however, Deutsch's algorithm is also important as the simplest member of a large family of quantum algorithms, including most notably Shor's quantum factoring algorithm. The second simplest algorithm in the family is the Deutsch–Jozsa algorithm, which solves a very closely related problem. Consider an unknown binary function with n input bits, giving N = 2 n possible inputs, and a single output bit.
Although the basic ideas of quantum computation are fairly straightforward, the detailed manipulations required to extract a useful result from an entangled superposition of answers can be rather complicated. There are, however, a small number of algorithms which are simple enough to explain using only elementary methods. The best example is Deutsch's algorithm: as this only requires two qubits its properties are amenable to brute-force matrix calculations, and these calculations can be simplified using a variety of short cuts, which also give some insight into how and why the algorithm works. We will also explore the simplest case of Grover's quantum search algorithm, which is once again simple enough to be tacked by brute force. Finally we will look briefly at two methods used to stabilize quantum computers against errors. Deutsch's algorithm The invention of Deutsch's algorithm can be taken as defining the start of modern quantum computation, and it remains a key example, exhibiting many of the key properties of quantum algorithms in a particularly simple form. (Note, however, that the version of Deutsch's algorithm described here is not in fact the original but a later modification which is both more powerful and easier to understand.) Consider a binary function f from one bit to one bit, that is a function which takes in either 0 or 1 as its input and returns either 0 or 1 as its output. There are four such functions which may be conveniently labeled by their outputs as shown in Table 8.1.
We are now ready to assemble quantum subroutines into quantum algorithms. A reasonable first question is: Are there problems which can be solved efficiently on a quantum computer? In his analysis of a universal quantum computer [25], Deutsch illustrated quantum parallelism by constructing a procedure to compute the parity f (0) ⊕ f (1) of a function on one bit. In a generalization of this context, Deutsch and Jozsa [27] defined a quantum algorithm that could solve a problem more efficiently than is possible on a classical computer. This problem helped motivate the search for algorithms that could solve “real” problems, and Simon [67] provided an example that inspired Shor’s subsequent work on the factoring problem and on the discrete logarithm problem. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
The quantum algorithms covered in this chapter, i.e., the Deutsch, Deutsch-Jozsa and Bernstein-Vazirani algorithms, have been chosen for their relative simplicity and theoretical interest. They do not address problems of real practical value, their purpose being to demonstrate, using simple examples, the great potential power of quantum computation relative to the digital case. The most significant breakthrough in quantum computing is Shor's integer factorisation algorithm. Shor's algorithm is beyond the scope of this introductory text, but its significance lies in the fact that it demonstrates the potential to factor large integers efficiently. No efficient digital algorithms for factoring large integers exist, and many current encryption algorithms rely on this being the case. Shor's algorithm therefore threatens current encryption methods, and is responsible for much of the recent accelerated interest in quantum computation.
This mathematically intensive chapter takes us through our first steps in the domain of quantum computation (QC) algorithms . The simplest of them is the Deutsch algorithm , which makes it possible to determine whether or not a Boolean function is constant for any input. The key result is that this QC algorithm provides the answer at once, whereas in the classical case it would take two independent calculations. I describe next the generalization of the former algorithm to n qubits, referred to as the Deutsch–Jozsa algorithm . Although they have no specific or useful applications in quantum computing, both algorithms represent a most elegant means of introducing the concept of quantum computation parallelism . I then describe two most important QC algorithms, which nicely exploit quantum parallelism. The first is the quantum Fourier transform (QFT), for which a detailed analysis of QFT circuits and quantum-gate requirements is also provided. As will be shown in the next chapter, a key application of QFT concerns the famous Shor's algorithm , which makes it possible to factor numbers into primes in terms of polynomials. The second algorithm, no less famous than Shor's, is referred to as the Grover quantum database search , whose application is the identification of database items with a quadratic gain in speed. Deutsch algorithm Our exploration of quantum algorithms shall begin with the solution of a very basic problem: finding whether or not a Boolean function f ( x ) is a constant.
Abstract In 1985, David Deutsch proposed the original quantum algorithm, a simple yet remarkable demonstration of the enhanced computational power offered by quantum mechanics. Deutsch’s algorithm provides a reduction in the number of queries to an unknown function required to discern some property of that function, relative to the best possible classical counterpart. This is known as an advantage in query complexity, and whilst the attention of the quantum computing community has, by and large, moved on to quantum algorithms that provide an advantage in computational rather than query complexity, it is still instructive to study some of the most important quantum algorithms for query problems. Such algorithms are historically important and, moreover, reveal the source of the computational power of quantum mechanics in a clear and easy to understand manner. This chapter studies four algorithms for query problems: Deutsch’s algorithm, the Deutsch–Jozsa algorithm, the Bernstein–Vazirani algorithm, and Simon’s algorithm.
Quantum computing is evolving so rapidly that it forces us to revisit, rewrite, and update the foundations of the theory. \emph{Basic Quantum Algorithms} revisits the earliest quantum algorithms. The journey began in 1985 with Deutsch attempting to evaluate a function at two domain points simultaneously. Then, in 1992, Deutsch and Jozsa created a quantum algorithm that determines whether a Boolean function is constant or balanced. The following year, Bernstein and Vazirani realized that essentially the same algorithm could be used to identify a specific Boolean function within a set of linear Boolean functions. In 1994, Simon introduced a novel quantum algorithm that determines whether a function is one-to-one or two-to-one exponentially faster than any classical algorithm for the same problem. That same year, Shor developed two groundbreaking quantum algorithms for integer factoring and calculating discrete logarithms, posing a threat to widely used cryptographic methods. In 1995, Kitaev proposed an alternative formulation based on phase estimation that proved valuable in numerous applications. The following year, Grover devised a quantum search algorithm that is quadratically faster than its classical counterpart. More than a decade later, Harrow, Hassidim, and Lloyd proposed a quantum algorithm for solving systems of linear equations, now known as the HHL algorithm. With an emphasis on the circuit model, this work provides a detailed description of all these remarkable algorithms.