The dynamical critical exponent is introduced. The phase diagram and the phase transitions in the Bose–Hubbard model of interacting bosons on a lattice are determined. The concept of quantum fluctuations is introduced on the example of an interacting superfluid, and finally the special scaling of conductivity is discussed. Dynamical critical exponent The finite temperature phase transitions studied in previous chapters are the result of the competition between the entropy and the energy terms in the free energy: the weight of entropy increases with temperature, and ultimately destroys the order that may be existing in the system. A sharp phase transition between two phases exhibiting qualitatively different correlations may, however, occur even at zero temperature, by varying a coupling constant in the Hamiltonian. The transition then corresponds to a non-analyticity of the energy of the ground state. A simple example is provided by the interacting bosons, where the superfluid transition may be brought about by tuning the chemical potential at T = 0. Such T = 0 phase transitions are called quantum phase transitions , and will be the subject of the present chapter. In general, a quantum phase transition may lie at the end of a line of thermal phase transitions, as in the bosonic example mentioned above. It is possible, however, that the system may not even have an ordered state at finite temperatures, but still exhibits a quantum critical point. Two different situations are depicted in Fig. 8.1. Examples of such phase diagrams are provided by the system of interacting bosons which will be discussed in Sections 8.2 and 8.3.
The dynamical critical exponent is introduced. The phase diagram and the phase transitions in the Bose–Hubbard model of interacting bosons on a lattice are determined. The concept of quantum fluctuations is introduced on the example of an interacting superfluid, and finally the special scaling of conductivity is discussed. Dynamical critical exponent The finite temperature phase transitions studied in previous chapters are the result of the competition between the entropy and the energy terms in the free energy: the weight of entropy increases with temperature, and ultimately destroys the order that may be existing in the system. A sharp phase transition between two phases exhibiting qualitatively different correlations may, however, occur even at zero temperature, by varying a coupling constant in the Hamiltonian. The transition then corresponds to a non-analyticity of the energy of the ground state. A simple example is provided by the interacting bosons, where the superfluid transition may be brought about by tuning the chemical potential at T = 0. Such T = 0 phase transitions are called quantum phase transitions , and will be the subject of the present chapter. In general, a quantum phase transition may lie at the end of a line of thermal phase transitions, as in the bosonic example mentioned above. It is possible, however, that the system may not even have an ordered state at finite temperatures, but still exhibits a quantum critical point. Two different situations are depicted in Fig. 8.1. Examples of such phase diagrams are provided by the system of interacting bosons which will be discussed in Sections 8.2 and 8.3.
Quantum Phase Transitions Quantum phase transitions, in contrast to temperature-driven critical phenomena, occur due to a competition between different parameters describing the basic interactions of the system. Their specific feature is the quantum character of the critical fluctuations. This implies, through the uncertainty principle, that energy fluctuations and time are coupled. Then at zero temperature time plays a crucial and fundamental role, the static properties being entangled with the dynamics (Continentino, 1994a; Sondhi et al ., 1997; Sachdev, 1999). In this book we are mainly interested in quantum phase transitions that occur in electronic many-body systems and how scaling concepts can be useful to understand their properties close to these transitions (Continentino, 1994a). Even though a similar approach has been used in the case of interacting bosons (Fisher et al ., 1989) the fermionic problem has its own idiosyncrasies and difficulties. For example, there is no natural order parameter associated with the localisation transition in the electronic case, while bosons at zero temperature are either localised or superfluid so that the superfluid order parameter can be used to distinguish between both phases. If the results of the study of quantum phase transitions were restricted to zero temperature, this would be an interesting but purely academic area of research. What is really exciting about this subject is the effect of quantum critical points (QCP) in the finite temperature phase diagram of actual physical systems, even far away from the QCP (Freitas, 2015). As we will show, there is a special line in this phase diagram, the quantum critical trajectory , where the temperature dependence of the thermodynamic and transport properties is governed by the quantum critical exponents, i.e. those associated with the QCP. This and the observed crossover effects induced by temperature in the non-critical side of the phase diagram of a material with a QCP are sufficient to make the study of quantum phase transitions an inevitable subject. We start this chapter by introducing the scaling theory of quantum critical phenomena, since scaling concepts are used throughout this book.
The phase diagrams and phase transitions of bosons with short-ranged repulsive interactions moving in periodic and/or random external potentials at zero temperature are investigated with emphasis on the superfluid-insulator transition induced by varying a parameter such as the density. Bosons in periodic potentials (e.g., on a lattice) at T=0 exhibit two types of phases: a superfluid phase and Mott insulating phases characterized by integer (or commensurate) boson densities, by the existence of a gap for particle-hole excitations, and by zero compressibility. Generically, the superfluid onset transition in d dimensions from a Mott insulator to superfluidity is ``ideal,'' or mean field in character, but at special multicritical points with particle-hole symmetry it is in the universality class of the (d+1)-dimensional XY model. In the presence of disorder, a third, ``Bose glass'' phase exists. This phase is insulating because of the localization effects of the randomness and analogous to the Fermi glass phase of interacting fermions in a strongly disordered potential.The Bose glass phase is characterized by a finite compressibility, no gap, but an infinite superfluid susceptibility. In the presence of disorder the transition to superfluidity is argued to occur only from the Bose glass phase, and never directly from the Mott insulator. This zero-temperature superfluid-insulator transition is studied via generalizations of the Josephson scaling relation for the superfluid density at the ordinary \ensuremath{\lambda} transition, highlighting the crucial role of quantum fluctuations. The transition is found to have a dynamic critical exponent z exactly equal to d and correlation length and order-parameter correlation exponents \ensuremath{\nu} and \ensuremath{\eta} which satisfy the bounds \ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{\ge}2/d and \ensuremath{\eta}\ensuremath{\le}2-d, respectively. It is argued that the superfluid-insulator transition in the presence of disorder may have an upper critical dimension dc which is infinite, but a perturbative renormalization-group calculation wherein the critical exponents have mean-field values for weak disorder above d=4 is also discussed. Many of these conclusions are verified by explicit calculations on a model of one-dimensional bosons in the presence of both random and periodic potentials. The general results are applied to experiments on 4He absorbed in porous media such as Vycor. Some measurable properties of the superfluid onset are predicted exactly [e.g., the exponent x relating the \ensuremath{\lambda} transition temperature to the zero-temperature superfluid density is found to be d/2(d-1)], while stringent bounds are placed on others. Analysis of preliminary data is consistent with these predictions.
Introduction The quantum phase transitions considered so far in this book are mostly continuous, second order. They are associated with the divergence of a correlation length and of a characteristic time that renders the quantum critical point scale invariant. However, there are many important phase transitions at which the order parameter goes abruptly to zero and, more important, at which the characteristics of length and critical time do not diverge. In general there is also a latent heat , or work required, to transform one phase into another. In this and the next chapter we study these discontinuous quantum phase transitions. We proceed by considering initially some important cases of what is known as fluctuation induced quantum phase transitions to next treat a more general case of a first-order quantum phase transition. We will show through the study of these problems that the concepts of critical exponents and scaling remain useful, even though these systems do not exhibit scale invariance at their critical point. In Chapter 15 we present the scaling theory of first-order quantum phase transitions and use its results to treat some general problems. One of the most interesting cases of fluctuation-induced transitions occurs in superconductors due to the coupling of the charged carriers to the electromagnetic field. We consider initially a wider class of systems with macroscopic wave functions, the superfluids, of which superconductors are the charged version. We adopt a macroscopic approach to this problem and describe the superfluid by a complex order parameter φ , such that | φ | 2 is proportional to the density of condensed particles. The zero temperature phase diagram is expressed in terms of a control parameter, m 2 , such that, at m 2 = 0, the system presents a quantum phase transition from a superfluid state, for m 2 < 0, φ ≠ 0, to a normal state for m 2 > 0 where φ = 0. In the case of the superconductor with particles of charge q = 2 e , we will include the coupling of these particles to the electromagnetic field and study its effect in the phase diagram of these systems. We show that in the neutral superfluid, the zero temperature transition to the normal state is continuous and occurs at a quantum critical point.
This chapter addresses phase transitions and dynamic scaling occurring in systems comprised of interacting indistinguishable quantum particles, for which entanglement correlations are crucial. It first describes how the dynamics (in real time) and thermodynamics (in imaginary time) of quantum many-particle Hamiltonians can be mapped onto field theories based on coherent-state path integrals. While bosons are described by complex-valued fields, fermions are represented by anticommuting Grassmann variables. Since quantum-mechanical systems are of inherently dynamical nature, the corresponding field theory action entails d + 1 dimensions, with time playing a special role. For Hamiltonians that incorporate only two-particle interactions, we can make contact with the previously studied Langevin equations, yet with effectively multiplicative rather than additive noise. As an illustration, this formalism is applied to deduce fundamental properties of weakly interacting boson superfluids. Whereas Landau–Ginzburg theory already provides a basic hydrodynamic description, the Gaussian approximation allows the computation of density correlations, the Bose condensate fraction, and the normal- and superfluid densities from the particle current correlations. We next establish that quantum fluctuations are typically irrelevant for thermodynamic critical phenomena, provided that T c > 0, and readily extend finite-size scaling theory to the imaginary time axis to arrive at general scaling forms for the free energy. Intriguing novel phenomena emerge in the realm of genuine quantum phase transitions at zero temperature, governed by other control parameters such as particle density, interaction or disorder strengths.
Aim and Scope of this Book A plethora of systems exhibit phase transitions as the temperature or some other parameter is changed. Examples range from the ice-water phase transition observed in our daily life to the loss of ferromagnetism in iron or to the more sophisticated Mott insulator-superfluid phase transition observed in optical lattices [343]. The last five decades have witnessed a tremendous upsurge in the studies of phase transitions at finite temperature [727, 149, 333, 136, 494, 541, 556]. The success of Landau-Ginzburg theories and the concepts of spontaneous symmetry breaking and the renormalization group [27, 410, 821, 578] in explaining many of the finite temperature phase transitions occurring in nature has been spectacular. In this book, we will consider only a subclass of phase transitions called quantum phase transitions (QPTs) [154, 658, 725, 799, 185, 63, 62, 66, 141, 744] and we will discuss these mainly from the view point of recent studies of information and dynamics. QPTs are zero temperature phase transitions which are driven by quantum fluctuations and are usually associated with a non-analyticity in the ground state energy density of a quantum many-body Hamiltonian. We will focus on continuous QPTs where the order parameter vanishes continuously at the quantum critical point (QCP) at some value of the parameters which characterize the Hamiltonian. We will not discuss first order quantum phase transitions associated with an abrupt change in the order parameter. Usually, a first order phase transition is characterized by a finite discontinuity in the first derivative of the ground state energy density. A continuous QPT is similarly characterized by a finite discontinuity, or divergence, in the second derivative of the ground state energy density, assuming that the first derivative is continuous. This is of course the classical definition; we will later mention some QPTs where the ground state energy density is not necessarily singular.
We study the zero-temperature phase transition of a two-dimensional disordered boson Hubbard model. The phase diagram is constructed in terms of the disorder strength and the chemical potential. Via Monte Carlo simulations, we find a multicritical line separating the weak-disorder regime, where the Mott-insulator-to-superfluid transition occurs, from the strong-disorder regime, where the Bose-glass-to-superfluid transition occurs. On the multicritical line, the insulator-to-superfluid transition has the dynamical critical exponent $z\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}1.35\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.05$ and the correlation length critical exponent $\ensuremath{\nu}\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}0.67\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.03$. We suggest that the proliferation of the particle-hole pairs screens out the weak-disorder effects.